Paired-pulse behavior of visually evoked potentials recorded in human visual cortex using patterned paired-pulse stimulation

Paired-pulse stimulation techniques are used as common tools to investigate cortical excitability and cortical plastic changes. Similar to investigations in the somatosensory and motor system here we applied a new paired-pulse paradigm to study the paired-pulse behavior of visually evoked potentials (VEPs) in 25 healthy subjects. VEPs were recorded and the responses to the first and the second P100 peak were analyzed at different SOAs [stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) = interstimulus interval (ISI) + pulse duration (13 ms)]. Two measures describe the paired pulse interaction: the “amplitude ratio”, the ratio of the second to the first amplitude, and the “latency shift”, the difference of the inter-peak interval between the P100 peaks and the respective SOA. To separate alterations in the amplitude of the second VEP response due to changes in paired-pulse inhibition from those originating from superposition of the two waveforms, particularly at short SOAs, we created a waveform template from recordings made at SOAs of 1 s, where interaction can be assumed to be negligible. Superposed traces of VEP recordings were then created by adding two templates at delays corresponding to the SOAs used. The original recordings were then digitally subtracted from the traces obtained by superposition. Analysis of the subtracted traces revealed evidence that at short SOAs the second VEP response is substantially suppressed, a finding comparable to the paired-pulse inhibition described for motor and somatosensory cortex following paired-pulse stimulation. However, paired-pulse inhibition seen in V1 varied considerably from subject to subject, both in respect to amplitude, and to time of maximal inhibition. We found paired-pulse inhibition ranging from 12 to 76% (mean 34%) at SOAs between 80 (shortest discriminable SOA) and 320 ms (mean 128 ms). At intermediate SOAs between 80 and 720 ms (mean 215 ms) the amplitude ratios were between 94 and 145% (mean 116%) indicative of slight paired-pulse facilitation. Comparable to recovery studies by means of paired-pulse median nerve stimulation in somatosensory cortex, at shorter SOAs we found a delayed second VEP response. Combined together, our findings suggest that VEPs are characterized by significant paired-pulse inhibition at short SOAs, a phenomenon reminiscent of findings reported in other modalities. Possible mechanisms and pharmacological properties of the described paired-pulse behavior in visual cortex remain to be explored.

[1]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: their topographic relationship , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  M. Versino,et al.  Recovery functions of early cortical median nerve SSEP components: normative data. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  G Curio,et al.  Double‐pulse stimulation dissociates intrathalamic and cortical high‐frequency (>400 Hz) SEP components in man , 2000, Neuroreport.

[4]  M. Yuen,et al.  Visual field plasticity in a female with right occipital cortical dysplasia. , 2000, Pediatric neurology.

[5]  C. Stevens,et al.  Facilitation and depression at single central synapses , 1995, Neuron.

[6]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Changes in somatosensory evoked responses by repetition of the median nerve stimulation , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  T. Allison Recovery functions of somatosensory evoked responses in man. , 1962, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  Ryusuke Kakigi,et al.  Two evoked responses with different recovery functions in the primary somatosensory cortex in humans , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Bach,et al.  Raster-scan cathode-ray tubes for vision research--limits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  H. Diener,et al.  Visual Cortex Excitability in Migraine Evaluated by Single and Paired Magnetic Stimuli , 2005, Headache.

[12]  L. Cohen,et al.  Enhanced excitability of the human visual cortex induced by short-term light deprivation. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  J. Schoenen,et al.  Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials in migraine. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  Diane Ruge,et al.  Short‐interval paired‐pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by tactile coactivation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans correlates with perceptual gain , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Vaegan,et al.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004) , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[18]  W. Regehr,et al.  Short-term synaptic plasticity. , 2002, Annual review of physiology.

[19]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Visual evoked potentials to double-pulse pattern presentation , 1983, Vision Research.

[20]  鯨井 隆 Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex , 1994 .

[21]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  Goff Wr,et al.  Modification of median nerve somatic evoked potentials by prior median nerve, peroneal nerve, and auditory stimulation. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  R. Sparing,et al.  Investigation of the primary visual cortex using short-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  J. Odom VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIALS STANDARD , 2004 .

[25]  B. Walmsley,et al.  A Novel Presynaptic Inhibitory Mechanism Underlies Paired Pulse Depression at a Fast Central Synapse , 1999, Neuron.

[26]  L. Cohen,et al.  Modulation of Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex after Forearm Ischemic Nerve Block , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  M Hallett,et al.  Studies of neuroplasticity with transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[28]  K. Sakai,et al.  Paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex: differences among I waves , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  J Liepert Task-dependent changes of intracortical inhibition , 1997 .

[30]  C. Shagass,et al.  RECOVERY FUNCTIONS OF HUMAN SOMATOSENSORY AND VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIALS * , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.