Performance review of the joints for the ITER poloidal field coils

For large scale magnets wound with cable-in-conduit conductors, the safe operation of the joints is of paramount importance to guarantee adequate reliability and stability margin of the whole magnet. For this reason, during the R&D activities undertaken for the development of the ITER magnet system, several experimental campaigns were launched to study the AC and DC performance of the joint and limit the risk of thermal runaways at the joints during the tokamak operation. The joint electrical resistance must be limited below specified values to avoid excessive heating generated by the transport current. Moreover, in presence of time-varying fields, different types of losses arise at the joints, which can be associated to their superconducting and resistive parts. The relative importance of these losses depends on the joint manufacturing solution. The aim of this investigation is to analyze the performance at different working conditions of the joints for the connection of the conductors of the poloidal field (PF) coils of the ITER magnet system. This work presents, for the first time, a wide review of the test campaign performed from 2016 to 2021 on the PF joint samples during the three manufacturing phases, namely pre-qualification, qualification and production. The values of electrical resistances and losses under sinusoidal field variations are reported in the paper at different operating conditions, thus building a useful database to assess the joint performances during the machine operation. The data here collected show the impact of the manufacturing techniques on the joint performances and, furthermore, represent a useful tool for the validation of numerical and analytical models of joints.

[1]  H. Krooshoop,et al.  SELFIE: ITER superconducting joint test facility , 2023, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[2]  S. Sgobba,et al.  The Effect of Specific Manufacturing Characteristics on PF ITER Full-Size Joint Performance , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[3]  N. Mitchell,et al.  Qualification Program of Lap Joints for ITER Coils , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[4]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Test of PF1 Coil Electrical Joint , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[5]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Investigation of RF Nb-Ti PF 1&6 Coils Conductor Performances in the SULTAN Test Facility , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[6]  Arend Nijhuis,et al.  Analysis of ITER PF Coil Joint Design Under Reference Operating Scenario , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[7]  Arnaud Devred,et al.  Design and Qualification of Joints for ITER Magnet Busbar System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[8]  N. Mitchell,et al.  Approaching ITER PF Coil Manufacturing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[9]  Pierluigi Bruzzone,et al.  Twin-box ITER joints under electromagnetic transient loads , 2015 .

[10]  G. Shen,et al.  Design and Analysis of Full Size Joint Sample for ITER PF Coil , 2015 .

[11]  G. Rolando,et al.  Simulations of Twin-Box Joints for ITER PF Coils , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[12]  A. Nijhuis,et al.  Analysis of Heat Load, Current Margin and Current Nonuniformity in ITER PF Coil Joints , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[13]  P. Libeyre,et al.  The ITER Magnets: Design and Construction Status , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[14]  Byung Su Lim,et al.  Design of the ITER PF Coil Joints , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[15]  F. Simon,et al.  Development of the ITER PF Coils , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[16]  A. Vostner,et al.  Status of ITER Conductor Development and Production , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[17]  N Mitchell,et al.  Design of the ITER PF Coils , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[18]  Robert Herzog,et al.  Reliability Considerations for the ITER Poloidal Field Coils , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[19]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Methods, Accuracy and Reliability of ITER Conductor Tests in SULTAN , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[20]  N. Mitchell,et al.  The ITER Magnet System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[21]  F. Bellina,et al.  Modeling AC losses in the ITER NbTi poloidal field full size joint sample (PF-FSJS) using the THELMA code , 2005 .

[22]  L. Muzzi,et al.  Effect of cyclic loading and conductor layout on contact resistance of full-size ITER PFCI conductors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[23]  R. Zanino,et al.  Current distribution measurement on the ITER-type NbTi bus bar III , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[24]  F. Bellina,et al.  Electromagnetic analysis of superconducting cables and joints in transient regime , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[25]  D. Ciazynski,et al.  Design and manufacture of a prototype NbTi full-size joint sample for the ITER poloidal field coils , 2003 .

[26]  D. Ciazynski,et al.  Electrical and thermal designs and analyses of joints for the ITER PF coils , 2002 .

[27]  M. Huguet,et al.  Key engineering features of the ITER-FEAT magnet system and implications for the R&D programme , 2001 .

[28]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Large superconductors and joints for fusion magnets: From conceptual design to testing at full scale , 2001 .

[29]  G. Shen,et al.  Void fraction research and destructive examination of CFETR toroidal field coil protype joints , 2023, Annals of Nuclear Energy.

[30]  S. Ito,et al.  Bending and Twisting Characteristics of REBCO Lap Joint With Indium , 2023, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[31]  P. Ribani,et al.  Electrodynamic Losses of the ITER PF Joints During the Dynamic Plasma Scenario , 2023, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[32]  P. Ribani,et al.  Analysis of Electrodynamic Transients in the ITER PF Joints , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[33]  N. Mitchell,et al.  Impact of mechanical and thermal cycles at different operating conditions on the ITER toroidal field coil conductor performance , 2021, Superconductor Science and Technology.