Investigation of the Discontinuous Galerkin Method for First-Order PDE Approaches to CFD

To simulate accurately and efficiently aerospace-type flows using solely first-order PDE models, new numerical methods may be required to overcome difficulties introduced by the model. We consider a Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method that has been shown to possess an asymptotic preservation (AP) property for one-dimensional hyperbolic relaxation systems, in an effort to understand the source of this property and to determine if this property persists for problems in which we are interested. Comparison with traditional MUSCL schemes suggests that the source of the known AP property results from a coupling of the flux and source terms by the direct evolution of the solution slope. For a canonical model problem in a single spatial dimension, we use Von Neumann analysis to demonstrate that the limiting flux function of the DG scheme is of the Harten-Lax-Van Leer type. Further Von Neumann analysis of both a MUSCL scheme and the DG scheme show that near equilibrium, both methods have mesh size restrictions related to the resolution of physical dissipation. The DG scheme is less numerically dissipative than the HR scheme in this limit. Numerical simulations demonstrate these findings in one dimension. In one and two dimensions, our numerical results demonstrate that the convergence rate of the DG scheme eventually drops as the mesh is refined.

[1]  Mohit Arora,et al.  Explicit characteristic-based high-resolution algorithms for hyperbolic conservation laws with stiff source terms. , 1996 .

[2]  Jim E. Morel,et al.  Methods for hyperbolic systems with stiff relaxation , 2002 .

[3]  Jim E. Morel,et al.  Discontinuous Galerkin for Stiff Hyperbolic Systems , 1999 .

[4]  Bram Van Leer,et al.  Discontinuous Galerkin for Diffusion , 2005 .

[5]  E. Larsen,et al.  Asymptotic solutions of numerical transport problems in optically thick, diffusive regimes II , 1989 .

[6]  Richard B. Pember,et al.  Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws With Stiff Relaxation I. Spurious Solutions , 1993, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[7]  Tai-Ping Liu Hyperbolic conservation laws with relaxation , 1987 .

[8]  Jeffrey Hittinger Foundations for the generalization of the Godunov method to hyperbolic systems with stiff relaxation source terms , 2000 .

[9]  Lorenzo Pareschi Characteristic-Based Numerical Schemes for Hyperbolic Systems With Nonlinear Relaxation , 1997 .

[10]  Kenneth G. Powell,et al.  An accuracy assessment of cartesian-mesh approaches for the euler equations , 1993 .

[11]  Vittorio Romano,et al.  Central Schemes for Balance Laws of Relaxation Type , 2000, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[12]  Philip L. Roe,et al.  Asymptotic analysis of the Riemann problem for constant coefficient hyperbolic systems with relaxation , 2004 .

[13]  L. Sainsaulieu,et al.  A roe-type Riemann solver for hyperbolic systems with relaxation based on time-dependent wave decomposition , 1997 .

[14]  P. Lax,et al.  On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1983 .

[15]  Richard B. Pember,et al.  Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws with Stiff Relaxation II. Higher-Order Godunov Methods , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[16]  C. D. Levermore,et al.  Numerical Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws with Stiff Relaxation Terms , 1996 .

[17]  C. D. Levermore,et al.  Hyperbolic conservation laws with stiff relaxation terms and entropy , 1994 .

[18]  Lorenzo Pareschi,et al.  Numerical Schemes for Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws with Stiff Diffusive Relaxation , 2000, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[19]  Giovanni Russo,et al.  Uniformly Accurate Schemes for Hyperbolic Systems with Relaxation , 1997 .

[20]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection , 1977 .

[21]  Josef Stoer,et al.  Numerische Mathematik 1 , 1989 .