Rhythmic activity of a group of human motoneurones during voluntary contraction of a muscle.

Abstract MU potentials of m.rectus femoris were led off with the help of needle electrodes under isometric contraction (up to 50% of the maximal strength). As many as 10 MUs, could be identified simultaneously. The experiments showed that under conditions of a fixed posture and a stable movement task, the order of recruitment and switch-off of motoneurones was usually stable. “Group behaviour” was typical when the strength of contraction changed the frequencies of different motoneurones changing in one direction. Such a pattern of behaviour of motoneurones agrees with the ideas of diffuse distribution of excitation in a motoneurone pool and of the organization of its activity on the basis of the “size principle” described by Henneman and co-workers. However, occasional independent changes in frequency of individual motoneurones and sub-groups of motoneurones were observed even under stable conditions of muscle contraction. Independent behaviour of motoneurones was particularly frequent in the case of a subject in a free posture or when his movement task was changed. In such cases, the recruitment order of motoneurones was not stable, discharge frequencies quite often changing in opposite directions and substitution of motoneurones occurring. This pattern of motoneurone behaviour can be explained only by the use of independent inputs. The data obtained give us reason to believe that the organization of activity of a motoneurone pool on the basis of general diffuse input can provide only standard forms of motor activity. Under natural conditions of movement of higher animals and man, in addition to differences in thresholds another more flexible mechanism of selective activation of motoneurones is employed. This mechanism secures a more subtle regulation of mechanical effect and prevents fatigue during prolonged contraction of a muscle by causing substitution of MUs through changes in posture.

[1]  J. Hannerz,et al.  Differences in recruitment order of motor units in phasic and tonic flexion reflex in `spinal man' , 1970, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  O. A. Mortensen,et al.  Identification and voluntary control of single motor unit activity in the tibialis anterior muscle , 1962, The Anatomical record.

[3]  E Jankowska,et al.  A comparison of peripheral and rubrospinal synaptic input to slow and fast twitch motor units of triceps surae , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. Granit The basis of motor control , 1970 .

[5]  D. Kernell,et al.  Input Resistance, Electrical Excitability, and Size of Ventral Horn Cells in Cat Spinal Cord , 1966, Science.

[6]  J. Szentágothai PROPRIOSPINAL PATHWAYS AND THEIR SYNAPSES. , 1964, Progress in brain research.

[7]  H. Hufschmidt Zur funktionellen Organisation der motorischen Einheiten eines Muskels , 2004, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Nervenheilkunde.

[8]  G. Somjen,et al.  Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  W. H. Talbot,et al.  PATTERN OF DISCHARGE OF FLEXOR MOTONEURONS. , 1964, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Gurfinkel' Vs,et al.  Work of human motor units during rhythmic movements , 1970 .

[11]  B. Ashworth,et al.  Comparison of voluntary and reflex activation of motor units. Functional organization of motor neurones. , 1967, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  David P. C. Lloyd,et al.  TRANSMITTER POTENTIALITY OF HOMONYMOUS AND HETERONYMOUS MONOSYNAPTIC REFLEX CONNECTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL MOTONEURONS , 1955, The Journal of general physiology.

[13]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  The cortical representation of motor units. , 1952, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  E Henneman,et al.  Responses of motoneurons of different sizes to graded stimulation of supraspinal centers of the brain. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D Kosarov,et al.  Studying the alpha motoneurone activity by investigating motor units of various sizes. , 1972, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  E Henneman,et al.  Terminals of single Ia fibers: location, density, and distribution within a pool of 300 homonymous motoneurons. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. E. Burger,et al.  Proprioceptive Influence in Volitional Control of Individual Motor Units , 1965, Nature.

[18]  G. Somjen,et al.  FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Hannerz,et al.  Recruitment order of motor units on voluntary contraction: changes induced by proprioceptive afferent activity. , 1968, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[20]  E. Henneman,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE DESIGN OF SKELETAL MUSCLES. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.