An Empirical Model for Reliable Spiking Activity

Understanding a neuron’s transfer function, which relates a neuron’s inputs to its outputs, is essential for understanding the computational role of single neurons. Recently, statistical models, based on point processes and using generalized linear model (GLM) technology, have been widely applied to predict dynamic neuronal transfer functions. However, the standard version of these models fails to capture important features of neural activity, such as responses to stimuli that elicit highly reliable trial-to-trial spiking. Here, we consider a generalization of the usual GLM that incorporates nonlinearity by modeling reliable and nonreliable spikes as being generated by distinct stimulus features. We develop and apply these models to spike trains from olfactory bulb mitral cells recorded in vitro. We find that spike generation in these neurons is better modeled when reliable and unreliable spikes are considered separately and that this effect is most pronounced for neurons with a large number of both reliable and unreliable spikes.

[1]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting , 2006 .

[2]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Local field potentials indicate network state and account for neuronal response variability , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[3]  L. Paninski.  Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[4]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Computation in a Single Neuron: Hodgkin and Huxley Revisited , 2002, Neural Computation.

[5]  Troy W. Margrie,et al.  A biophysical signature of network affiliation and sensory processing in mitral cells , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Christof Koch,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons (Computational Neuroscience Series) , 1998 .

[7]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Regulation of spike timing in visual cortical circuits , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990 .

[9]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  From Spiking Neuron Models to Linear-Nonlinear Models , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  What Causes a Neuron to Spike? , 2003, Neural Computation.

[11]  G Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Optimal time scale for spike-time reliability: theory, simulations, and experiments. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[13]  Nathaniel N Urban,et al.  Greater excitability and firing irregularity of tufted cells underlies distinct afferent‐evoked activity of olfactory bulb mitral and tufted cells , 2014, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Sarah M. N. Woolley,et al.  A Generalized Linear Model for Estimating Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields from Responses to Natural Sounds , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Klaus Nordhausen,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Second Edition by Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, Jerome Friedman , 2009 .

[16]  Chun-I Yeh,et al.  Temporal precision in the neural code and the timescales of natural vision , 2007, Nature.

[17]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[18]  L. Paninski,et al.  Temporal Precision in the Visual Pathway through the Interplay of Excitation and Stimulus- Driven Suppression , 2022 .

[19]  Robert E. Kass,et al.  A Spike-Train Probability Model , 2001, Neural Computation.

[20]  N. Urban,et al.  Intrinsic biophysical diversity decorrelates neuronal firing while increasing information content , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Vivien A. Casagrande,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons , 1999 .

[22]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Stochastic Integrate-and-Fire Neural Encoding Model , 2004, Neural Computation.

[23]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Analysis of Neural Data , 2014 .

[24]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Timescale-dependent shaping of correlation by olfactory bulb lateral inhibition , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Shreejoy J Tripathy,et al.  Intermediate intrinsic diversity enhances neural population coding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Extracting non-linear integrate-and-fire models from experimental data using dynamic I–V curves , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  H. L. Bryant,et al.  Spike initiation by transmembrane current: a white‐noise analysis. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Nathaniel N Urban,et al.  Disrupting information coding via block of 4-AP-sensitive potassium channels. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[30]  Troy W. Margrie,et al.  Population diversity and function of hyperpolarization-activated current in olfactory bulb mitral cells , 2011, Scientific reports.

[31]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered neural characterization. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[32]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Parameter extraction and classification of three cortical neuron types reveals two distinct adaptation mechanisms. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for the Stimulus-Response Relationships of Multistate Neural Systems , 2011, Neural Computation.

[34]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Bayesian brain : probabilistic approaches to neural coding , 2006 .