Adopting open source software in public administration: The importance of boundary spanners and political commitment

Abstract Open source software (OSS) adoption in public administrations around the world has been uneven. Despite the substantive economic and efficiency-related implications of OSS adoption, there is surprisingly little research into the determinants of the diffusion of OSS across public sector jurisdictions. In this article we explore the variation in OSS adoption among Dutch local administrations. The Dutch central government adopted a policy to stimulate the use of OSS in the public sector, but the non-mandatory character of the policy resulted in great differences in the degree of adoption of OSS at the local level. Using data from a new survey of municipalities in the Netherlands and proportional odds statistical models to analyze the data, we show that the degree of OSS adoption crucially depends on the presence of boundary spanners and political commitment within the local government. On the other hand, oft-suspected factors like financial stress and jurisdiction size have no discernible effects. Our findings have implications for understanding the spread of OSS in the public sector and for public policies designed to encourage OSS diffusion.

[1]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Tae Ho Eom,et al.  Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital , 2009 .

[3]  J. A. Calvin Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[4]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States , 2008 .

[5]  Michael J. Ahn,et al.  Adoption of E-Communication Applications in U.S. Municipalities: The Role of Political Environment, Bureaucratic Structure, and the Nature of Applications , 2011 .

[6]  Kris Ven,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on the Organizational Adoption of Open Source Software , 2008, J. Database Manag..

[7]  D. Moynihan,et al.  Cognitive Biases in Governing: Technology Preferences in Election Administration , 2012 .

[8]  Kimberly L. Nelson,et al.  Form of Government Still Matters , 2012 .

[9]  Asmus Leth Olsen,et al.  ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS AND THE DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS: THE CASE OF CITIZEN SERVICE CENTRES , 2011 .

[10]  Kris Ven,et al.  The Organizational Adoption of Open Source Server Software: A Quantitative Study , 2008, ECIS.

[11]  Robin Gauld,et al.  What Public Servants Really Think of E-Government , 2012 .

[12]  Lorraine Morgan,et al.  How Perceptions of Open Source Software Influence Adoption: An Exploratory Study , 2007, ECIS.

[13]  Kris Ven,et al.  The Organizational Adoption of Open Source Server Software by Belgian Organizations , 2006, OSS.

[14]  Mark K. Cassell Why Governments Innovate: Adoption and Implementation of Open Source Software by Four European Cities , 2008 .

[15]  Sukumar Ganapati,et al.  Uses of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Applications in E‐Government , 2011 .

[16]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  E-Government and Bureaucracy: Toward a Better Understanding of Intranet Implementation and its Effect on Red Tape , 2006 .

[17]  Greta Nasi,et al.  ONLINE SERVICE PROVISION: ARE MUNICIPALITIES REALLY INNOVATIVE? THE CASE OF LARGER MUNICIPALITIES IN ITALY , 2011 .

[18]  S. Geertman,et al.  New Technologies Stuck in Old Hierarchies: The Diffusion of Geo‐Information Technologies in Dutch Public Organizations , 2007 .

[19]  D. Norris,et al.  Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change? , 2013 .

[20]  H. Wolman Innovation in Local Government and Fiscal Austerity , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[21]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  M. Allers,et al.  Bezuinigingen en crisisbeheersing: Financiële plannen van gemeenten 2010-2012 , 2010 .

[23]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers , 2009 .

[24]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[25]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[26]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  Organizational Decline and Innovation: A Contingency Framework , 1998 .

[27]  G. Albaum The Likert scale revisited: an alternate version , 1997 .

[28]  Kaiju Chang,et al.  Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective , 2011 .

[29]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local U.S. Governments , 2014 .

[30]  N. Schillewaert,et al.  Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research , 2002 .

[31]  Valentina Mele,et al.  Explaining programmes for change: Electronic government policy in Italy (1993 – 2003) , 2008 .

[32]  C. Weare,et al.  Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government , 2011 .