Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models

Research summary: This article uses Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) to advance strategic management research, focusing on an application to board interlock network tie formation. Networks form as the result of actor attributes as well as through the influence of existing ties. Conventional regression models require assumptions of independence between observations, and fail to incorporate endogenous structural effects of the observed network. ERGMs represent a methodological innovation for network formation research given their ability to model actor attributes along with endogenous structural processes. We illustrate these advantages by modeling board interlock formation among Fortune 100 firms. We also demonstrate how ERGMs offer significant opportunities to extend existing strategy research and open new pathways in multiparty alliances, microfoundations of interorganizational network formation, and multiplexity of ties among actors. Managerial summary: Social networks are increasingly important in the business world, not only between individuals but also between organizations. Firms can obtain information, resources, and status through their external network connections, and understanding how these outside ties form is an important goal of strategy research. Our paper helps advance this effort by introducing a new tool for social network analysis, Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) to the management and strategy fields. We provide an example of this method, demonstrating how social network ties form between companies when they hire common directors to their boards. Executives can benefit from this research through a greater understanding of how corporate relationships are built with allies as well as among competitors. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  IS in Interorganizational Networks , 2010 .

[2]  Javier Gimeno,et al.  Competition within and Between Networks: The Contingent Effect of Competitive Embeddedness on Alliance Formation , 2004 .

[3]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[4]  C. Wright Mills,et al.  The Power Elite , 1956 .

[5]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures , 2007 .

[6]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Evolution: The Origins of Structural Holes , 2009 .

[7]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: An Introduction to Random Graphs, Dependence Graphs, and p * , 2005 .

[8]  Peng Wang,et al.  MPNet Program for the Simulation and Estimation of (p*) Exponential Random Graph Models for , 2014 .

[9]  Ove Frank,et al.  http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained , 2007 .

[10]  Tasuku Igarashi Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Longitudinal Changes in Face-to-Face and Text Message–Mediated Friendship Networks , 2012 .

[11]  G. Davis Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network , 1991 .

[12]  David Krackhardt,et al.  WANTED: A Good Network Theory of Organization@@@Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. , 1995 .

[13]  T. Snijders The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[14]  Johan Koskinen,et al.  Exponential random graph model fundamentals , 2013 .

[15]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation , 2000 .

[16]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Pamela R. Haunschild How Much Is That Company Worth?: Interorganizational Relationships, Uncertainty and Acquisition Premiums , 1994 .

[18]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  Are all ‘sharks’ dangerous? new biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances , 2012 .

[19]  Kevin Lewis,et al.  Beyond and Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Performance Implications of Timing of Entry and Involvement in Multi-Partner Alliances , 2007 .

[21]  D. Strang,et al.  DIFFUSION IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills , 1998 .

[22]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[23]  Toby E. Stuart Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[24]  Pip Pattison,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Autologistic Actor Attribute Model Analysis of Unemployment: Dual Importance of Who You Know and Where You Live , 2012 .

[25]  Amy J. Hillman,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Review of the Director Selection Literature , 2012 .

[26]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[27]  STRATEGIC DETERRENCE AMONG MULTIPOINT COMPETITORS. , 1991 .

[28]  D. J. Strauss,et al.  Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks , 1990 .

[29]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms , 2009 .

[30]  D. Hunter,et al.  Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks , 2006 .

[31]  Yannick C. Atouba,et al.  Interorganizational Networking Patterns Among Development Organizations , 2010 .

[32]  Garry Robins,et al.  Structural Logic of Intraorganizational Networks , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Garry Robins,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Formation of Social Network Structure , 2012 .

[34]  P. Pattison,et al.  9. Neighborhood-Based Models for Social Networks , 2002 .

[35]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[36]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Two's Company, Three's a Crowd? Triads in Cooperative-Competitive Networks , 2007 .

[37]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[38]  M. Bauer Exchange And Power In Social Life , 2016 .

[39]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[40]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of Exponential Random Graph Models , 2002, J. Soc. Struct..

[41]  Peng Wang,et al.  Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[42]  Martina Morris,et al.  Specification of Exponential-Family Random Graph Models: Terms and Computational Aspects. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[43]  S. Klepper Employee Startups in High‐Tech Industries , 2001 .

[44]  Marijtje A. J. van Duijn,et al.  Simulation for Statistical Inference in Dynamic Network Models , 1997 .

[45]  C. Mills,et al.  Power Elite , 1956, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[46]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms , 2001 .

[47]  Garry Robins,et al.  An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[48]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[49]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[50]  Simon Rodan,et al.  Knowledge Networks, Collaboration Networks, and Exploratory Innovation , 2014 .

[51]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation , 2008 .

[52]  Bruce A. Desmarais,et al.  Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models , 2011, Political Analysis.

[53]  C. Geyer,et al.  Constrained Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood for Dependent Data , 1992 .

[54]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  What is network science? , 2013, Network Science.

[55]  D. Hunter,et al.  Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models , 2008 .

[56]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  When Do Interlocks Matter?: Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence , 1998 .

[57]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[59]  Jianfeng Wu,et al.  When Unconnected Others Connect: Does Degree of Brokerage Persist After the Formation of a Multipartner Alliance? , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Julien Brailly,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks , 2014 .

[61]  Joel Podolny A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[62]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. , 1999, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[63]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  The Significance of Board Interlocks for Corporate Governance , 1996 .

[64]  Garry Robins,et al.  Interdependencies between Working Relations: Multivariate ERGMs for Advice and Satisfaction , 2012 .

[65]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  Alliance Constellations: A Social Exchange Perspective , 2002 .

[67]  James R. Lincoln,et al.  Analyzing Relations in Dyads , 1984 .

[68]  J. Colquitt,et al.  TRENDS IN THEORY BUILDING AND THEORY TESTING: A FIVE-DECADE STUDY OF THE ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL , 2007 .

[69]  Garry Robins,et al.  Illustrations: simulation, estimation and goodness of fit , 2013 .

[70]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures , 1999 .

[71]  Janet M. Dukerich,et al.  Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation , 2014 .

[72]  P. Pattison,et al.  Network models for social influence processes , 2001 .

[73]  Xiaohui Lu,et al.  Unraveling the Mechanisms of Reputation and Alliance Formation: A Study of Venture Capital Syndication in China , 2013 .

[74]  Donald Palmer,et al.  Lost in Space: The Geography of Corporate Interlocking Directorates1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  Lori Qingyuan Yue,et al.  Organization Science , 2022 .

[76]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres Group versus group: How alliance networks compete , 1994 .

[77]  S. Goodreau,et al.  Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks* , 2009, Demography.

[78]  Peng Wang,et al.  Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[79]  Gerald R. Salancik,et al.  WANTED: A Good Network Theory of Organization , 2016 .

[80]  Dan Li,et al.  Governance in Multilateral R&D Alliances , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[81]  Garry Robins,et al.  The Focused Organization of Advice Relations: A Study in Boundary Crossing , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[82]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[83]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[84]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[85]  Martina Morris,et al.  6. Exponential Family Models for Sampled and Census Network Data , 2004 .

[86]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. , 1999 .

[87]  Balagopal Vissa,et al.  A Matching Theory of Entrepreneurs ’ Tie Formation Intentions and Initiation of Economic Exchange , 2010 .

[88]  P. Pattison,et al.  New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models , 2006 .

[89]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Testing Multitheoretical, Multilevel Hypotheses About Organizational Networks: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example , 2006 .

[90]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  DO TIES REALLY BIND? THE EFFECT OF KNOWLEDGE AND COMMERCIALIZATION NETWORKS ON OPPOSITION TO STANDARDS , 2014 .

[91]  Zhiang Lin,et al.  A multilevel framework of firm boundaries: Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes , 2010 .

[92]  WHO GETS AHEAD IN THE MARKET FOR CORPORATE DIRECTORS: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF MULTIPLE BOARD MEMBERSHIPS. , 1993 .

[93]  A. van de Rijt,et al.  The Matthew effect in science funding , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[94]  Martina Morris,et al.  statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[95]  D. R. White,et al.  Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups , 2003 .

[96]  R. Gulati Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[97]  Garry Robins,et al.  Understanding individual behaviors within covert networks: the interplay of individual qualities, psychological predispositions, and network effects , 2009 .

[98]  Tim Rowley,et al.  Inertia and Evaluation Mechanisms in Interorganizational Partner Selection: Syndicate Formation among U.S. Investment Banks , 2002 .

[99]  Andrew V. Shipilov,et al.  The Missing Link: The Effect of Customers on the Formation of Relationships Among Producers in the Multiplex Triads , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[100]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Organizational and Class Bases of Stability in a Corporate Interlock Network , 1986 .

[101]  Johan Koskinen,et al.  Dependence Graphs and Sufficient statistics , 2013 .

[102]  M. Mizruchi What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[103]  P. Pattison LOGIT MODELS AND LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS FOR SOCIAL NETWORKS: I. AN INTRODUCTION TO MARKOV GRAPHS AND p* STANLEY WASSERMAN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS , 1996 .

[104]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[105]  Peng Wang,et al.  Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[106]  M. Handcock Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology Assessing Degeneracy in Statistical Models of Social Networks , 2005 .

[107]  David R. Hunter,et al.  Curved exponential family models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[108]  P. Holland,et al.  A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometric Data , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[109]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[110]  Damon J. Phillips A Genealogical Approach to Organizational Life Chances: The Parent-Progeny Transfer among Silicon Valley Law Firms, 1946–1996 , 2002 .

[111]  S. Green Sarbanes-Oxley and the Board of Directors: Techniques and Best Practices for Corporate Governance , 2005 .

[112]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[113]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates , 1988 .

[114]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Investigating the Microstructure of Network Evolution: Alliance Formation in the Mobile Communications Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[115]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[116]  Martina Morris,et al.  ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[117]  Peng Wang,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Exponential Random Graph Model Extensions: Models for Multiple Networks and Bipartite Networks , 2012 .

[118]  James S. Linck,et al.  The Effects and Unintended Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the Supply and Demand for Directors , 2008 .

[119]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[120]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Relational Pluralism Within and Between Organizations , 2014 .