Coproduced urban water services: When technical and governance hybridisation go hand in hand

This study questions the processes of technical and governance hybridisation in the coproduction of water services in cities of the Global South. The existing literature addresses the compensatory role that water services coproduction plays in urban and peri-urban areas, where access to centralised and reliable water resources is often lacking. However, less research focuses on the evolution of coproduced practices in relation to wider transitions of urban spaces, water resources, centralised infrastructure, and service delivery strategies. Still, the resulting technical and governance configurations stemming from these situations are largely unexplored. This study considers four cities, namely, Hanoi (Vietnam), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Cochabamba (Bolivia), and Addis Ababa (Ethiopia). All our case studies are somewhat characterised by rapid land-use changes, juxtaposition of rural and urban activities, varying urban typologies, and increasing poverty, sociospatial inequality, and exclusionary service provision. We draw on data collected from field surveys and participatory workshops with inhabitants and institutional actors between 2017 and 2020 as part of a recent research project. We explore the evolution of water coproduction from technological and governance perspectives. The cases analysed in the research highlight that the time and social development of water coproduction do not follow a linear path. It is rather characterised by cycles of emergence, maturation, and decline. It may build upon pre-existing forms of community-based water management that were established in rural areas (for irrigation or water harvesting, for instance). The results show that water coproduction may have different evolutions, entailing different hybridisation processes. Water coproduction can be characterised by either complementary or concurrent service configurations, by blurring actor categories, and by different drivers in the hybridisation process. Ultimately, evolution in urban coproduced practices appears as a process of technical and governance hybridisation, rather than as final and fixed hybrid systems.

[1]  G. Faldi,et al.  Urban service co-production and technology: nine key issues , 2022, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development.

[2]  G. Faldi,et al.  Five Points for Conceptualising Place-Based Approaches to African Urban Planning: An Introduction , 2021, The Urban Book Series.

[3]  A. Abiko,et al.  Exploring appropriate socio-technical arrangements for the co-production of landslide risk management strategies in informal neighbourhoods in Colombia and Brazil , 2021, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development.

[4]  Ratoola Kundu,et al.  Co-Production or Contested Production? Complex Arrangements of Actors, Infrastructure, and Practices in Everyday Water Provisioning in a Small Town in India , 2020, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development.

[5]  J. Teller,et al.  A Multi-perspective Discourse on the Sustainability of Water and Sanitation Service Co-production in Global South Cities , 2020, Handbook of Quality of Life and Sustainability.

[6]  J. Teller,et al.  An incremental approach to service co-production: unfolding the co-evolution of the built environment and water and sanitation infrastructures , 2020, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development.

[7]  Sylvy Jaglin,et al.  Co-production of access and hybridisation of configurations: a socio-technical approach to urban electricity in Cotonou and Ibadan , 2020, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development.

[8]  S. Han Co-producing an urban mobility service? The role of actors, policies, and technology in the boom and bust of dockless bike-sharing programmes , 2020, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development.

[9]  H. Kyed Hybridity and boundary-making: exploring the politics of hybridisation , 2017, Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development.

[10]  J. Teller,et al.  A comprehensive framework for analyzing co-production of urban water and sanitation services in the Global South , 2019, Water International.

[11]  Yuzhen Yang,et al.  Urban planning historical review of master plans and the way towards a sustainable city: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania , 2019, Frontiers of Architectural Research.

[12]  Larissa Larsen,et al.  The Impact of Rapid Urbanization and Public Housing Development on Urban Form and Density in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia , 2019, Land.

[13]  P. Matczak,et al.  Typologies of citizen co-production in flood risk governance , 2018, Environmental Science & Policy.

[14]  J. Teller,et al.  Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the global South , 2018, Environment and Urbanization.

[15]  D. Mitlin,et al.  Editorial: Co-production – key ideas , 2018, Environment and Urbanization.

[16]  J. V. Kruijf,et al.  Stormwater management in transition: The influence of technical and governance attributes in the case of Brussels, Belgium , 2018, Environmental Science & Policy.

[17]  Bram Verschuere,et al.  The dark side of co-creation and co-production: seven evils , 2018 .

[18]  A. Allen,et al.  Water trajectories through non-networked infrastructure: insights from peri-urban Dar es Salaam, Cochabamba and Kolkata , 2017, Coproducing Water, Energy and Waste Services.

[19]  Luisa Moretto,et al.  A socio-natural standpoint to understand coproduction of water, energy and waste services , 2017, Coproducing Water, Energy and Waste Services.

[20]  Tina Nabatchi,et al.  Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction , 2017 .

[21]  R. Jaffe,et al.  Hybrid Governance Arrangements , 2016 .

[22]  J. Webb Beyond the Networked City , 2016 .

[23]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Beyond the Networked City: Infrastructure reconfigurations and urban change in the North and South , 2015 .

[24]  P. Albrecht,et al.  The simultaneity of authority in hybrid orders , 2015 .

[25]  K. Furlong STS beyond the "modern infrastructure ideal": Extending theory by engaging with infrastructure challenges in the South , 2014 .

[26]  S. Spronk,et al.  Popular participation, equity, and co-production of water and sanitation services in Caracas, Venezuela , 2014 .

[27]  F. Cleaver,et al.  Informal space in the urban waterscape: Disaggregation and co-production of water services , 2014 .

[28]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Towards hybrid socio-technical solutions for urban water and energy provision , 2014 .

[29]  T. Goodfellow,et al.  The clash of institutions: traditional authority, conflict and the failure of ‘hybridity’ in Buganda , 2013 .

[30]  Harry Smith,et al.  EMBEDDING TRANS-DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH APPROACHES TO STRATEGIC URBAN EXPANSION PLANNING THROUGH COMBINED METHODS IN A CONTEXT OF WEAK INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY. EXPERIENCE OF HUAMBO, ANGOLA , 2013 .

[31]  Morten Jakobsen,et al.  Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment , 2013 .

[32]  A Allen,et al.  Water provision for and by the peri-urban poor: Public-community partnerships or citizens co-production? , 2012 .

[33]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Co-governing decentralised water systems: an analytical framework. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  K. Meagher The Strength of Weak States? Non‐State Security Forces and Hybrid Governance in Africa , 2012 .

[35]  J. Peterson A Conceptual Unpacking of Hybridity: Accounting for Notions of Power, Politics and Progress in Analyses of Aid-Driven Interfaces , 2012 .

[36]  Gëzim Visoka,et al.  Three Levels of Hybridisation Practices in Post-conflict Kosovo , 2012 .

[37]  P. Bazeley Computer Assisted Integration of Mixed Methods Data Sources and Analyses , 2010 .

[38]  O. Coutard Placing splintering urbanism: Introduction , 2008 .

[39]  Karen Bakker,et al.  Governance Failure: Rethinking the Institutional Dimensions of Urban Water Supply to Poor Households , 2008 .

[40]  Diana Mitlin,et al.  With and beyond the state — co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations , 2008 .

[41]  Trương Huyền Chi Wards of Hanoi , 2008 .

[42]  A. Tesfaye Problems and prospects of housing development in Ethiopia , 2007 .

[43]  M. Kjellén From Public Pipes to Private Hands : Water Access and Distribution in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania , 2006 .

[44]  J. Adamson Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (eds). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003, pp.768, £77.00 ISBN: 0-7619-2073-0. , 2004 .

[45]  Faranak Miraftab,et al.  Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment , 2004 .

[46]  Thierry Ramadier,et al.  Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies , 2004 .

[47]  K. Bakker Archipelagos and networks: urbanization and water privatization in the South , 2003 .

[48]  E. Ostrom Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development , 1996 .

[49]  J. Offner Le développement des réseaux techniques : un modèle générique , 1993 .