Categories of Return on Investment and Their Practical Implications

Publisher Summary When user-centered design (UCD) practitioners conduct usability research, they normally observe and measure both user behavior and user perceptions of a product, system, or website. User behavior is usually convincing evidence, although they gain insight, supporting data, explanations, rationale, and new ideas from users' perceptions and opinions. Usability research findings have the most effect when user behavior and perceptions both point to the same conclusions. The categories of usability return on investment (ROI) have a similar model. Measuring direct ROI, whether internal or external, is like observing user behavior and just as in usability research, confounds can make measurements more challenging. In internal ROI, it can measure the amount of reused code or the time to market saved by an effective UCD infrastructure. In external ROI, confounds can measure the decreases in dropout rate for user registrations, increases in sales, or the reduction in customer support costs. This chapter discusses internal, external, and social ROI, and suggests methods for achieving and measuring these three components of usability ROI. The underlying message is that UCD practitioners and teams can convince stakeholders that their efforts produce ROI.

[1]  Allen E. Milewski,et al.  Delegating to software agents , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Carol M. Barnum,et al.  Usability testing and research , 2001 .

[3]  Robert W. Bailey,et al.  Performance vs. Preference , 1993 .

[4]  Joseph F. Dumas,et al.  A Practical Guide to Usability Testing , 1993 .

[5]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[6]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[7]  Richard H. Smith,et al.  The Effect of a Favor on Public and Private Compliance: How Internalized is the Norm of Reciprocity? , 1999 .

[8]  John L. Bennett,et al.  Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution , 1988 .

[9]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[10]  Michael Good Developing the XUI style , 1989 .

[11]  Steve Howard,et al.  Methods & tools: the rich picture: a tool for reasoning about work context , 1998, INTR.

[12]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[13]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[14]  Randolph G. Bias Free Usability Data , 1997, INTERACT.

[15]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[16]  Pamela Kostur,et al.  Managing Enterprise Content: A Unified Content Strategy , 2002 .

[17]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[18]  Karen Donoghue,et al.  Built for Use: Driving Profitability Through the User Experience , 2002 .

[19]  Chauncey E. Wilson,et al.  The whiteboard: Tracking usability issues: to bug or not to bug? , 2001, INTR.

[20]  James A. Landay,et al.  The Design of Sites: Patterns, Principles, and Processes for Crafting a Customer-Centered Web Experience , 2002 .

[21]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Remote Usability Testing Through the Internet , 1999, HCI.

[22]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Measuring usability: preference vs. performance , 1994, CACM.

[23]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[24]  Alain Degenne,et al.  Introducing Social Networks , 1999 .

[25]  Roger S. Pressman,et al.  Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach , 1982 .

[26]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[27]  Theodor D. Sterling,et al.  Publication decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to p , 1995 .