Functional and structural brain differences associated with mirror-touch synaesthesia

Observing touch is known to activate regions of the somatosensory cortex but the interpretation of this finding is controversial (e.g. does it reflect the simulated action of touching or the simulated reception of touch?). For most people, observing touch is not linked to reported experiences of feeling touch but in some people it is (mirror-touch synaesthetes). We conducted an fMRI study in which participants (mirror-touch synaesthetes, controls) watched movies of stimuli (face, dummy, object) being touched or approached. In addition we examined whether mirror touch synaesthesia is associated with local changes of grey and white matter volume in the brain using VBM (voxel-based morphometry). Both synaesthetes and controls activated the somatosensory system (primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, SI and SII) when viewing touch, and the same regions were activated (by a separate localiser) when feeling touch--i.e. there is a mirror system for touch. However, when comparing the two groups, we found evidence that SII seems to play a particular important role in mirror-touch synaesthesia: in synaesthetes, but not in controls, posterior SII was active for watching touch to a face (in addition to SI and posterior temporal lobe); activity in SII correlated with subjective intensity measures of mirror-touch synaesthesia (taken outside the scanner), and we observed an increase in grey matter volume within the SII of the synaesthetes' brains. In addition, the synaesthetes showed hypo-activity when watching touch to a dummy in posterior SII. We conclude that the secondary somatosensory cortex has a key role in this form of synaesthesia.

[1]  Gerrit W. Maus,et al.  Prevalence, characteristics and a neurocognitive model of mirror-touch synaesthesia , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  David P. Friedman,et al.  Physiological evidence for serial processing in somatosensory cortex. , 1987, Science.

[3]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  K Zilles,et al.  Functional lateralization of face, hand, and trunk representation in anatomically defined human somatosensory areas. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  S-J Blakemore,et al.  Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Aviva I. Goller,et al.  Mirror-touch synaesthesia in the phantom limbs of amputees , 2013, Cortex.

[7]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  High incidence of ‘synaesthesia for pain’ in amputees , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  J. Decety,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in Social Interaction: How Low-Level Computational Processes Contribute to Meta-Cognition , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[9]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Inter-individual differences in empathy are reflected in human brain structure , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  Y. Iwamura Hierarchical somatosensory processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  J. Aharon-Peretz,et al.  Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Neural correlates of anchoring-and-adjustment during mentalizing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Sophie K Scott,et al.  Suppressing Sensorimotor Activity Modulates the Discrimination of Auditory Emotions But Not Speaker Identity , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Thomas D. Wright,et al.  “That’s not a real body”: Identifying stimulus qualities that modulate synaesthetic experiences of touch , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  U. Halsband,et al.  Motor learning in man: A review of functional and clinical studies , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[17]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The somatotopic organization of cytoarchitectonic areas on the human parietal operculum. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  P. Haggard,et al.  Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans , 2001, Current Biology.

[19]  Susan A. Sadek,et al.  Atypical neural self-representation in autism. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Anatomical and Functional Connectivity of Cytoarchitectonic Areas within the Human Parietal Operculum , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Brass,et al.  Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Georg Northoff,et al.  Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  Paul W. Burgess,et al.  When I think about me and simulate you: Medial rostral prefrontal cortex and self-referential processes , 2010, NeuroImage.

[24]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  The Sense of Touch: Embodied Simulation in a Visuotactile Mirroring Mechanism for Observed Animate or Inanimate Touch , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Michael Schaefer,et al.  Effects of different viewing perspectives on somatosensory activations during observation of touch , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[26]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[27]  D. Pitcher,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Disrupts the Perception and Embodiment of Facial Expressions , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Motor systems , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  B. Libet,et al.  Somatosensory System , 1973, Handbook of Sensory Physiology.

[30]  A. Davies,et al.  A sensational illusion: Vision-touch synaesthesia and the rubber hand paradigm , 2013, Cortex.

[31]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Seeing touch is correlated with content-specific activity in primary somatosensory cortex. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Induction of mirror-touch synaesthesia by increasing somatosensory cortical excitability , 2013, Current Biology.

[33]  E. Làdavas,et al.  Viewing a Face (Especially One's Own Face) Being Touched Enhances Tactile Perception on the Face , 2008, Psychological science.

[34]  J. Ward,et al.  Mirror-touch synesthesia is linked with empathy , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Somatosensation in social perception , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  John C. Marshall,et al.  When seeing is feeling: Acquired synaesthesia or phantom touch? , 1996 .

[37]  Jamie Ward,et al.  Superior Facial Expression, But Not Identity Recognition, in Mirror-Touch Synesthesia , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  A. Iggo,et al.  Somatosensory System , 1973 .

[39]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Enhanced sensory perception in synaesthesia , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  irror-sensory synaesthesia : Exploring ‘ shared ’ sensory experiences as ynaesthesia , 2011 .

[41]  Ludovico Minati,et al.  Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping , 2011, Neuroreport.

[42]  R. Adolphs,et al.  A Role for Somatosensory Cortices in the Visual Recognition of Emotion as Revealed by Three-Dimensional Lesion Mapping , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Todd S. Woodward,et al.  Aberrant connectivity during self–other source monitoring in schizophrenia , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[44]  H Burton,et al.  Neuronal activity in the second somatosensory cortex of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during active touch of gratings. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Tactile discrimination of grating orientation: fMRI activation patterns , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[46]  Leah Krubitzer,et al.  Cortical connections of the second somatosensory area and the parietal ventral area in macaque monkeys , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[47]  Tony Ro,et al.  Neural Substrates of Sound–Touch Synesthesia after a Thalamic Lesion , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  R. Kawashima,et al.  Self‐face recognition in social context , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[49]  Harold Burton,et al.  Multiple parietal operculum subdivisions in humans: Tactile activation maps , 2008, Somatosensory & motor research.

[50]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited , 2007, NeuroImage.

[51]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Allodynia: a sensory analogue of motor mirror neurons in a hyperaesthetic patient reporting instantaneous discomfort to another's perceived sudden minor injury? , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[52]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  L. Fogassi,et al.  A Touching Sight SII/PV Activation during the Observation and Experience of Touch , 2004, Neuron.