Evaluating terrestrial water storage variations from regionally constrained GRACE mascon data and hydrological models over Southern Africa – preliminary results

A concentration of surface mass has a distinct, localized signature in Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) K-band range rate (KBRR) data. This fact is exploited in the regional solutions for mass concentration parameters (mascons) made at the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). In this paper we explore an experimental set of regionally constrained mascon blocks over Southern Africa where a system of 1.25° × 1.5° and 1.5° × 1.5° blocks has been designed. The blocks are divided into hydrological regions based on drainage patterns of the largest river basins, and are constrained in different ways. We show that the use of regional constraints, when solving mascon parameters of different hydrological regions independently, yields more detail and variation than comparable spherical harmonic solutions and mascon solutions using isotropic constraints. We validate our results over Lake Malawi with water level from altimetry. Results show that weak constraints across regions in addition to intra-regional constraints are necessary, to reach reasonable mass variations.

[1]  S. Petrovic,et al.  Integration of GRACE mass variations into a global hydrological model , 2009 .

[2]  Andreas Güntner,et al.  Improvement of Global Hydrological Models Using GRACE Data , 2008 .

[3]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  Localized analysis of satellite tracking data for studying time‐variable Earth's gravity fields , 2008 .

[4]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[5]  James L. Davis,et al.  Land water storage within the Congo Basin inferred from GRACE satellite gravity data , 2006 .

[6]  G. Niu,et al.  Assessing a land surface model's improvements with GRACE estimates , 2006 .

[7]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Monthly spherical harmonic gravity field solutions determined from GRACE inter‐satellite range‐rate data alone , 2006 .

[8]  C. Shum,et al.  Improved estimation of terrestrial water storage changes from GRACE , 2005 .

[9]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[10]  F. LeMoine,et al.  Resolving mass flux at high spatial and temporal resolution using GRACE intersatellite measurements , 2005 .

[11]  O. Andersen,et al.  Global inter‐annual gravity changes from GRACE: Early results , 2005 .

[12]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[13]  Victor Zlotnicki,et al.  Time‐variable gravity from GRACE: First results , 2004 .

[14]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[15]  P. Döll,et al.  A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation , 2003 .

[16]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  An analysis of terrestrial water storage variations in Illinois with implications for the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) , 2001 .

[17]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Global Mass Flux Solutions from GRACE: A Comparison of Parameter Estimation Strategies - Mass Concentrations Versus Stokes Coefficients , 2010 .

[18]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data , 2007 .

[19]  E. Zechner,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions on the Measurement of Solute Concentrations in 2-d Flow Tank Experiments , 2022 .