Efficient Convex Relaxation Methods for Robust Target Localization by a Sensor Network Using Time Differences of Arrivals

We consider the problem of target localization by a network of passive sensors. When an unknown target emits an acoustic or a radio signal, its position can be localized with multiple sensors using the time difference of arrival (TDOA) information. In this paper, we consider the maximum likelihood formulation of this target localization problem and provide efficient convex relaxations for this nonconvex optimization problem. We also propose a formulation for robust target localization in the presence of sensor location errors. Two Cramer-Rao bounds are derived corresponding to situations with and without sensor node location errors. Simulation results confirm the efficiency and superior performance of the convex relaxation approach as compared to the existing least squares based approach when large sensor node location errors are present.

[1]  Yiu-Tong Chan,et al.  Exact and approximate maximum likelihood localization algorithms , 2006, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[2]  Paul Tseng,et al.  Second-Order Cone Programming Relaxation of Sensor Network Localization , 2007, SIAM J. Optim..

[3]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Robust adaptive beamforming using worst-case performance optimization: a solution to the signal mismatch problem , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[4]  BiswasPratik,et al.  Semidefinite programming based algorithms for sensor network localization , 2006 .

[5]  K. C. Ho,et al.  An accurate algebraic solution for moving source location using TDOA and FDOA measurements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  K.D. Frampton Acoustic self-localization in a distributed sensor network , 2006, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[7]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing , 2002 .

[8]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory , 2002 .

[9]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[10]  Yinyu Ye,et al.  Semidefinite programming based algorithms for sensor network localization , 2006, TOSN.

[11]  La-or Kovavisaruch,et al.  Source Localization Using TDOA and FDOA Measurements in the Presence of Receiver Location Errors: Analysis and Solution , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Jos F. Sturm,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones , 1999 .

[13]  WADE FOY,et al.  Position-Location Solutions by Taylor-Series Estimation , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  Michael J. Rycroft,et al.  Understanding GPS. Principles and Applications , 1997 .

[15]  Chee-Yee Chong,et al.  Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  Wing-Kin Ma,et al.  Accurate approximation algorithm for TOA-based maximum likelihood mobile location using semidefinite programming , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[17]  S. Bancroft An Algebraic Solution of the GPS Equations , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[18]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[19]  Julius O. Smith,et al.  Closed-form least-squares source location estimation from range-difference measurements , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[20]  Steven A. Tretter,et al.  Optimum processing for delay-vector estimation in passive signal arrays , 1973, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[21]  E. Weinstein Optimal source localization and tracking from passive array measurements , 1982 .

[22]  G. Carter,et al.  The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay , 1976 .

[23]  K. C. Ho,et al.  A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..