Development and mechanical validation of an in vitro system for bone cell vibration loading

Vibration loading, both low magnitude and high magnitude at high frequency, has been demonstrated to have an anabolic effect on bone cells. The study of the mechanotransduction, the process by which mechanical loadings are detected by cells and converted in chemical signal, is made accessible through the use of in vitro loading system. The aim of an in vitro loading system is to recreate the forces acting in the cell microenvironment. The goal of this study was to develop and mechanically validate a vibration loading system able to engender sinusoidal vertical vibration at different combinations of magnitude (0.3 g, 1 g and 3 g) and frequency (30 Hz, 60 Hz and 90 Hz). A system like this can be therefore employed to study cell response to high and low magnitudes at high frequencies, thus providing a comprehensive evaluation of bone cell mechanotransduction. The mechanical validation, that is the characterization of the right loading input to the system to obtain the desired stimulation on cell culture, was performed in two different methods: open-loop and closed-loop mode. The results obtained in the open-loop mode showed a good intra-day repeatability of the measurements with values of index of dispersion always lower than 0.6%. While in the closed-loop mode a systematic search was implemented to reach the optimal amplitude stimulation. The vibration signals acquired on long term test following the systematic search showed a good stability with index of dispersion always lower than 1%. Following the mechanical validation, the system was used to stimulate osteoblast like cells (Saos-2) with vibration loading of nine combinations of magnitude and frequency and the cell proliferation was studied 24h after the treatment by cell counting. Our preliminary results showed that no alterations in the proliferation were induced by 90 Hz vibration loading. On the other hand, small modulations in the proliferation were reported for lower stimulation frequency, being statistically significant when using 0.3 g of amplitude at 30 Hz.

[1]  Jinxiang Han,et al.  Tenascin C affects mineralization of SaOS2 osteoblast-like cells through matrix vesicles. , 2016, Drug discoveries & therapeutics.

[2]  Behzad Javaheri,et al.  Preclinical models for in vitro mechanical loading of bone-derived cells. , 2015, BoneKEy reports.

[3]  Jenneke Klein-Nulend,et al.  A comparison of strain and fluid shear stress in stimulating bone cell responses—a computational and experimental study , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[4]  Stefan Judex,et al.  Low‐Level, High‐Frequency Mechanical Signals Enhance Musculoskeletal Development of Young Women With Low BMD , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  C. Rubin,et al.  Prevention of Postmenopausal Bone Loss by a Low‐Magnitude, High‐Frequency Mechanical Stimuli: A Clinical Trial Assessing Compliance, Efficacy, and Safety , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  Yu-Xian Yan,et al.  Differential effects of mechanical strain on osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast-related gene expression in RAW264.7 cells. , 2012, Molecular medicine reports.

[7]  C. Rubin,et al.  Low Magnitude Mechanical Loading Is Osteogenic in Children With Disabling Conditions , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  A. van der Plas,et al.  Sensitivity of osteocytes to biomechanical stress in vitro , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[9]  S MacNeil,et al.  Matrix production and collagen structure are enhanced in two types of osteogenic progenitor cells by a simple fluid shear stress stimulus. , 2012, European cells & materials.

[10]  M. Francis,et al.  Experimental model for stimulation of cultured human osteoblast-like cells by high frequency vibration , 2002, Cytotechnology.

[11]  H. Oxlund,et al.  Low-intensity, high-frequency vibration appears to prevent the decrease in strength of the femur and tibia associated with ovariectomy of adult rats. , 2003, Bone.

[12]  Hanjoong Jo,et al.  The Role of Mechanical Stimulation in Recovery of Bone Loss—High versus Low Magnitude and Frequency of Force , 2014, Life.

[13]  Toshihiko Shiraishi,et al.  Effects of Amplitude and Frequency of Mechanical Vibration Stimulation on Cultured Osteoblasts , 2008 .

[14]  G. Reilly,et al.  Application of multiple forms of mechanical loading to human osteoblasts reveals increased ATP release in response to fluid flow in 3D cultures and differential regulation of immediate early genes , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  C. Turner,et al.  Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain , 1995, Calcified Tissue International.

[16]  Y. Mikuni‐Takagaki,et al.  Mechanotransduction in stretched osteocytes--temporal expression of immediate early and other genes. , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  Jason D. Allen,et al.  Parallel-plate flow chamber and continuous flow circuit to evaluate endothelial progenitor cells under laminar flow shear stress. , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[18]  R. J. McCoy,et al.  Influence of shear stress in perfusion bioreactor cultures for the development of three-dimensional bone tissue constructs: a review. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[19]  B. Beck,et al.  Vibration Therapy to Prevent Bone Loss and Falls: Mechanisms and Efficacy , 2015, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

[20]  S. Weinbaum,et al.  Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes. , 2013, Bone.

[21]  angesichts der Corona-Pandemie,et al.  UPDATE , 1973, The Lancet.

[22]  Axel Guenther,et al.  Effect of low-magnitude, high-frequency vibration on osteocytes in the regulation of osteoclasts. , 2010, Bone.

[23]  Stefan Judex,et al.  Separating Fluid Shear Stress from Acceleration during Vibrations In Vitro: Identification of Mechanical Signals Modulating the Cellular Response , 2012, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[24]  Lance E. Lanyon,et al.  Lrp5 Is Not Required for the Proliferative Response of Osteoblasts to Strain but Regulates Proliferation and Apoptosis in a Cell Autonomous Manner , 2012, PloS one.

[25]  H. Frost.  Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. , 2003, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[26]  Christopher R. Jacobs,et al.  Osteocytes as mechanosensors in the inhibition of bone resorption due to mechanical loading , 2006 .

[27]  D. Burr,et al.  Mechanotransduction in bone: osteoblasts are more responsive to fluid forces than mechanical strain. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[28]  C. Rubin,et al.  Anabolism: Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones , 2001, Nature.

[29]  W R Taylor,et al.  Osteoclastogenesis is repressed by mechanical strain in an in vitro model , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[30]  C. Rubin,et al.  The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low‐magnitude mechanical stimuli , 2001, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.