Resolving range ambiguities in high-repetition rate airborne light detection and ranging applications

Correctly determining a measurement range in light detection and ranging instruments, based on time-of-flight measurements on laser pulses, requires the association of each received echo pulse with its causative emitted laser pulse. Without further precautions, this definite association is only possible under specific conditions constraining the usability of range finders and laser scanners with very high measurement rates. We give an introduction to known techniques for avoiding and resolving range ambiguities. The specific disadvantages of these methods led to the development of a technique based on pulse-position modulation (PPM) of the laser pulse train using a pseudorandom noise signal and the subsequent analysis of the impact of the PPM on groups of consecutive range measurements. The error probability of our approach has been evaluated by simulations based on real scan data. The use of a discrete uniform distribution of amplitudes as a modulation signal shows high detection robustness even for difficult terrain like forest areas. The encouraging results of the simulations led to the practical implementation of PPM to our laser scanners and the development of the associated software RiMTA, which resolves range ambiguities without the necessity of a priori information on the target situation and without any user interaction required.

[1]  N. Levanon,et al.  Mitigating Range Ambiguity in High PRF Radar using Inter-Pulse Binary Coding , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[2]  Boris Jutzi,et al.  Investigations on ambiguity unwrapping of range images , 2009 .

[3]  Sivaprasad Gogineni,et al.  Performance of a 1319 nm laser radar using RF pulse compression , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[4]  R. A. Cryan,et al.  Optical space communications employing pulse position modulation , 1992 .

[5]  George Vosselman,et al.  Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[6]  Hou Jianguo,et al.  Exploitation of SRTM DEM in InSAR phase unwrapping problem , 2010, IEEE 10th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING PROCEEDINGS.

[7]  Louis N. Ridenour,et al.  Radar system engineering , 1947 .

[8]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[9]  Karl Gerlach Second time around radar return suppression using PRI modulation , 1989 .

[10]  Martin Pfennigbauer,et al.  MULTI-WAVELENGTH AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION , 2013 .

[11]  E. Bork,et al.  Integrating LIDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis , 2007 .

[12]  A. Antoniou,et al.  Application of wideband signals to airborne laser bathymetry , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[13]  G. Buller,et al.  Resolving range ambiguity in a photon counting depth imager operating at kilometer distances. , 2010, Optics express.