Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Assessing Risk of Recurrent Hamstring Injuries in Elite Athletes

Background Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has established its usefulness in diagnosing hamstring muscle strain and identifying features correlating with the duration of rehabilitation in athletes; however, data are currently lacking that may predict which imaging parameters may be predictive of a repeat strain. Purpose This study was conducted to identify whether any MR imaging-identifiable parameters are predictive of athletes at risk of sustaining a recurrent hamstring strain in the same playing season. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Forty-one players of the Australian Football League who sustained a hamstring injury underwent MR examination within 3 days of injury between February and August 2002. The imaging parameters measured were the length of injury, cross-sectional area, the specific muscle involved, and the location of the injury within the muscle-tendon unit. Players who suffered a repeat injury during the same season were reimaged, and baseline and repeat injury measurements were compared. Comparison was also made between this group and those who sustained a single strain. Results Forty-one players sustained hamstring strains that were positive on MR imaging, with 31 injured once and 10 suffering a second injury. The mean length of hamstring muscle injury for the isolated group was 83.4 mm, compared with 98.7 mm for the reinjury group (P = .35). In the reinjury group, the second strain was also of greater length than the original (mean, 107.5 mm; P = .07). Ninety percent of players sustaining a repeat injury demonstrated an injury length greater than 60 mm, compared with only 58% in the single strain group (P = .01). Only 7% of players (1 of 14) with a strain <60 mm suffered a repeat injury. Of the 27 players sustaining a hamstring strain >60 mm, 33% (9 of 27) suffered a repeat injury. Of all the parameters assessed, only a history of anterior cruciate ligament sprain was a statistically significant predictor for suffering a second strain during the same season of competition. Conclusion A history of anterior cruciate ligament injury was the only statistically significant risk factor for a recurrent hamstring strain in our study. Of the imaging parameters, the MR length of a strain had the strongest correlation association with a repeat hamstring strain and therefore may assist in identifying which athletes are more likely to suffer further reinjury.

[1]  W. Garrett Muscle Strain Injuries , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  J. Slavotinek,et al.  The effect of sports specific training on reducing the incidence of hamstring injuries in professional Australian Rules football players , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[3]  John P Slavotinek,et al.  Assessment of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings of hamstring injury as predictors for recurrent injury. , 2006, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[4]  J Ekstrand,et al.  Previous injury as a risk factor for injury in elite football: a prospective study over two consecutive seasons , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  Muscle Strain Injuries , 1996 .

[6]  J. Slavotinek,et al.  Clinical risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury: a prospective study with correlation of injury by magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, British journal of sports medicine.

[7]  David Connell,et al.  Evaluation of the hamstring muscle complex following acute injury , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.

[8]  J P Slavotinek,et al.  Assessment of player performance following return to sport after hamstring muscle strain injury. , 2006, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[9]  J. Hoving,et al.  A Comparison between Clinical Assessment and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Hamstring Injuries , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  K. Bennell,et al.  A pilot randomised controlled trial of eccentric exercise to prevent hamstring injuries in community-level Australian Football. , 2006, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[11]  T. Best,et al.  A comparison of 2 rehabilitation programs in the treatment of acute hamstring strains. , 2004, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[12]  T. Best,et al.  Return to Play Following Muscle Strains , 2005, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[13]  J W Orchard,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Risk Factors for Muscle Strains in Australian Football ∗ , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Eiichi Tsuda,et al.  Direct Evidence of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Hamstring Reflex Arc in Humans * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  John Orchard,et al.  The management of muscle strain injuries: an early return versus the risk of recurrence. , 2002, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[16]  N. Gibbs,et al.  The accuracy of MRI in predicting recovery and recurrence of acute grade one hamstring muscle strains within the same season in Australian Rules football players. , 2004, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[17]  John Orchard,et al.  Preseason Hamstring Muscle Weakness Associated with Hamstring Muscle Injury in Australian Footballers , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  J. Slavotinek,et al.  Hamstring injury in athletes: using MR imaging measurements to compare extent of muscle injury with amount of time lost from competition. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  C F Finch,et al.  Predictors of hamstring injury at the elite level of Australian football , 2006, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[20]  T. Kaminski,et al.  Concentric versus enhanced eccentric hamstring strength training: clinical implications. , 1998, Journal of athletic training.

[21]  Colin W. Fuller,et al.  Incidence, Risk, and Prevention of Hamstring Muscle Injuries in Professional Rugby Union , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[22]  U. Proske,et al.  IDENTIFYING ATHLETES AT RISK OF HAMSTRING STRAINS AND HOW TO PROTECT THEM , 2004, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[23]  M. Järvinen,et al.  Relation between myofibers and connective tissue during muscle injury repair , 2000, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[24]  Rachelle Buchbinder,et al.  Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.