Locomotion Mode Recognition With Robotic Transtibial Prosthesis in Inter-Session and Inter-Day Applications

Locomotion mode recognition across multiple sessions and days is an indispensable step towards the practical use of the robotic transtibial prosthesis. In this study, we proposed an adaptive recognition strategy to against the time-varying features of on-prosthesis mechanical signals in inter-session and inter-day recognition tasks. The strategy was designed with an automatic training algorithm which could update the classifiers with the data of the most recent completed gait cycles to seize the changes of the features brought by external disturbances. After implementation, we measured multiple experimental sessions on six transtibial amputees with intervals from a few hours (inter-session experiment) to several months (108 days at most in inter-day experiment). In each session, they performed five locomotion modes and eight locomotion transitions using the robotic prosthesis. Between each two experimental sessions, the subjects were required to doff the robotic prosthesis (including the socket). The proposed adaptive recognition algorithm significantly improved recognition accuracies in both experiments. In inter-session experiment, the proposed method increased the recognition accuracy from 89.3% to 92.8% than previous non-adaptive recognition method. In inter-day experiments, it increased the recognition accuracy from 60% to 88.8%. If taking three modes (level walking, stair ascending/descending) and four locomotion transitions into calculation, the recognizer produced an accuracy up to 96.6% (swing phase) for static mode and an accuracy of 96.9% for locomotion transitions on inter-day tasks without manual intervenes. Compared with state-of-the-art, our study extends the ability of the robotic transtibial prosthesis in locomotion mode recognition across multiple sessions and days. Future efforts are worth being paid in this direction to get more promising results.

[1]  Long Wang,et al.  A Wearable Plantar Pressure Measurement System: Design Specifications and First Experiments with an Amputee , 2012, IAS.

[2]  Qining Wang,et al.  Combining Push-Off Power and Nonlinear Damping Behaviors for a Lightweight Motor-Driven Transtibial Prosthesis , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[3]  Long Wang,et al.  Walk the Walk: A Lightweight Active Transtibial Prosthesis , 2015, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[4]  Ann M. Simon,et al.  Across-Day Lower Limb Pattern Recognition Performance of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis , 2018, 2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob).

[5]  M. Nash,et al.  The Amputee Mobility Predictor: An instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's abi , 2002 .

[6]  Fan Zhang,et al.  An Adaptive Classification Strategy for Reliable Locomotion Mode Recognition , 2017, Sensors.

[7]  Suzanne B. Finucane,et al.  Online adaptive neural control of a robotic lower limb prosthesis , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A training strategy to reduce classification degradation due to electrode displacements in pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[9]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A walking controller for a powered ankle prosthesis , 2013, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Ann M. Simon,et al.  A Training Method for Locomotion Mode Prediction Using Powered Lower Limb Prostheses , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Meinard Müller,et al.  Dynamic Time Warping , 2008 .

[12]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Continuous Locomotion-Mode Identification for Prosthetic Legs Based on Neuromuscular–Mechanical Fusion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Neuromechanical sensor fusion yields highest accuracies in predicting ambulation mode transitions for trans-tibial amputees , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Depth Sensing for Improved Control of Lower Limb Prostheses , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Long Wang,et al.  A Noncontact Capacitive Sensing System for Recognizing Locomotion Modes of Transtibial Amputees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Enhao Zheng,et al.  Noncontact Capacitive Sensing-Based Locomotion Transition Recognition for Amputees With Robotic Transtibial Prostheses , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Qining Wang,et al.  Real-Time On-Board Recognition of Continuous Locomotion Modes for Amputees With Robotic Transtibial Prostheses , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Toward Design of an Environment-Aware Adaptive Locomotion-Mode-Recognition System , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  Long Wang,et al.  Fuzzy-Logic-Based Terrain Identification with Multisensor Fusion for Transtibial Amputees , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[24]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Design and Validation of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic (AMP-) Foot 2.0 , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.