Evidence-based cesarean technique

Purpose of review Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed on US women, and rates of cesarean delivery continue to increase. Recent findings Recent studies on operative technique in cesarean section have contributed significantly to our knowledge of antibiotic prophylaxis, bladder flap formation, management of the uterine repair and closure of the peritoneum and skin. There is compelling evidence that antibiotics should be given prior to skin incision rather than the traditional administration after cord clamping. Additionally, evidence suggesting benefit to multiagent, extended-coverage regimens is mounting. Recent studies challenge the accepted practice of creating a bladder flap in cesarean section. Uterine repair can be safely accomplished either intra or extraabdominally but the debate over single versus double-layer closure continues. Nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum confers significant benefit, but recent evidence suggests that closure of the parietal layer may be advantageous with respect to future adhesions. Summary It is imperative that all technical aspects in cesarean section continue to be challenged. Widely accepted aspects, including antibiotics administration at cord clamping and creation of a bladder flap, may not be best practice.

[1]  J. Pasquier,et al.  Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  D. Chestnut Parietal peritoneal closure and persistent postcesarean pain , 2010 .

[3]  R. Dehghani Firouzabadi,et al.  Effect of expansion technique of uterine incision on maternal blood loss in cesarean section , 2010, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[4]  Y. Cheong,et al.  To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  P. Sagot,et al.  Cesarean section in morbidly obese women: supra or subumbilical transverse incision? , 2009, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[6]  L. Meyn,et al.  Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery Before Skin Incision , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  J. Korte,et al.  Blunt Needles for the Reduction of Needlestick Injuries During Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  V. Allen,et al.  Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques. , 2009, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[9]  D. Lezotte,et al.  Neonatal Outcomes After Elective Cesarean Delivery , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  D. Vergara,et al.  Effects of visceral peritoneal closure on scar formation at cesarean delivery , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  L. Turcot-Lemay,et al.  A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  D. Vergara,et al.  Closure Versus Non-Closure of the Visceral Peritoneum (VP) in Patients with Gestational Hypertension—An Observational Analysis , 2009, Hypertension in pregnancy.

[13]  D. Chestnut Impact of extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis on incidence of postcesarean surgical wound infection , 2009 .

[14]  A. Shahin,et al.  Does visceral peritoneal closure affect post-cesarean urinary symptoms? A randomized clinical trial , 2009, International Urogynecology Journal.

[15]  N. Mahajan Justifying formation of bladder flap at cesarean section? , 2009, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[16]  E. Orji,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non‐exteriorisation at caesarean section , 2008, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[17]  S. Omar,et al.  Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures for subcuticular skin closure of a transverse suprapubic incision , 2008, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  F. Ghezzi,et al.  Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  G. Saade,et al.  Timing of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  D. Eschenbach,et al.  High-Concentration Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce the Incidence of Postcesarean Surgical Site Infection: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  Yvonne W. Cheng,et al.  Effect of a change in policy regarding the timing of prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of postcesarean delivery surgical-site infections. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  J. Perlow Preventing needlestick injuries in obstetrics and gynecology: how can we improve the use of blunt tip needles in practice? , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  T. Burkhardt,et al.  Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. , 2008, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[24]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  Techniques for caesarean section. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[25]  A. Nabhan Long‐term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean , 2008, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[26]  J. Hauth,et al.  Decreasing Incidence of Postcesarean Endometritis With Extended-Spectrum Antibiotic Prophylaxis , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  V. Catanzarite,et al.  Preventing needlestick injuries in obstetrics and gynecology: how can we improve the use of blunt tip needles in practice? , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  P. Brocklehurst,et al.  The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial , 2007, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[29]  C. Pettker,et al.  Ultrasound Evaluation of the Uterine Scar After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial of One- and Two-Layer Closure , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  D. Todman A history of caesarean section: From ancient world to the modern era , 2007, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[31]  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394, December 2007. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  Y. Blumenfeld,et al.  Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[33]  S. Chauhan,et al.  Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  S. Gates,et al.  Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK. , 2002, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[36]  E. Hamilton,et al.  The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[37]  S. Gates,et al.  Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK , 2002 .

[38]  P. Husslein,et al.  Is the Formation of a Bladder Flap at Cesarean Necessary? A Randomized Trial , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  K. R. Hema,et al.  Techniques for performing caesarean section. , 2001, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[40]  C. Goodman American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Technical Bulletins , 1988 .

[41]  MRCOG Examination,et al.  Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists , 1952, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Empire.