The role of spatial and surface cues in the age-processing of unfamiliar faces

Two experiments investigated the importance of spatial and surface cues in the age-processing of unfamiliar faces aged between one and 80 years. Three manipulations known to affect face recognition were used, individually and in various combinations: inversion, negation, and blurring. Faces were presented either in whole or in part. Age-estimation performance was largely unaffected by most of these manipulations; age-processing appears to be a highly robust process, due to the numerous cues available. Experiment 1 showed that, in contrast to face recognition, age-perception appears to be substantially unimpaired by inversion or negation. Experiment 2 suggests that age-estimates can be made on the basis of either surface information (the 2D disposition of the internal facial features, together with texture information) or shape information (head-shape plus feature configuration, as long as shape-from-shading information is present).

[1]  G. Pike,et al.  Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. , 1997 .

[2]  A. Johnston,et al.  The Role of Movement in Face Recognition , 1997 .

[3]  D. Perrett,et al.  Presentation-Time Measures of the Effects of Manipulations in Colour Space on Discrimination of Famous Faces , 1997, Perception.

[4]  H. Leder.  Line Drawings of Faces Reduce Configural Processing , 1996, Perception.

[5]  R Kemp,et al.  Perception and Recognition of Normal and Negative Faces: The Role of Shape from Shading and Pigmentation Cues , 1996, Perception.

[6]  G. Hole,et al.  Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Age Estimates of Unfamiliar Faces , 1995, Perception.

[7]  E. Chronicle,et al.  You Can Tell by the Nose—Judging Sex from an Isolated Facial Feature , 1995, Perception.

[8]  D. Perrett,et al.  Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  V Bruce,et al.  The Use of Pigmentation and Shading Information in Recognising the Sex and Identities of Faces , 1994, Perception.

[10]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images , 1991 .

[12]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[13]  V. Bruce,et al.  Further experiments on the perception of growth in three dimensions , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  A. Young,et al.  Handbook of Research on Face Processing , 1989 .

[15]  T. Valentine.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[16]  A Hayes,et al.  Identification of Two-Tone Images; Some Implications for High- and Low-Spatial-Frequency Processes in Human Vision , 1988, Perception.

[17]  J. Montepare,et al.  The influence of facial characteristics on children's age perceptions. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  M C Morrone,et al.  Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images , 1986, Perception.

[19]  D. Berry,et al.  Perceiving character in faces: the impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  J. Todd,et al.  Describing perceptual information about human growth in terms of geometric invariants , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of growth in three dimensions , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory , 1980 .

[23]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  Wrinkling and head shape as coordinated sources of age-level information , 1980 .

[24]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  Perceptual information for the age level of faces as a higher order invariant of growth. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Salzmann.  Handbook of facial growth , 1977 .

[26]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  L. D. Harmon.  The recognition of faces. , 1973, Scientific American.

[28]  N. Kretchmer.  Lactose and lactase. , 1972, Scientific American.

[29]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Recognition memory for photographs of faces. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[30]  Melvin L. Moss,et al.  The human face—An account of the postnatal growth and development of the craniofacial skeleton , 1971 .

[31]  R. Galper,et al.  Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .

[32]  J. Sergent.  STRUCTURAL PROCESSING OF FACES , 1989 .

[33]  J. Sergent.  Microgenesis of Face Perception , 1986 .

[34]  A. Young,et al.  Aspects of face processing , 1986 .

[35]  A. Viidik.  Functional properties of collagenous tissues. , 1973, International review of connective tissue research.

[36]  William L. Brudon,et al.  The human face : an account of the postnatal growth and development of the craniofacial skeleton , 1968 .

[37]  D. Jackson,et al.  International review of connective tissue research , 1963 .