Improving The Nexus Between Research And Teaching In Undergraduate IS Education

This study outlines a framework to assess the merits of integrating IS research into undergraduate teaching. Though the general merits of such integration have been explored, with limited empirical evidences in many previous (non-IS related) studies, this integration is particularly much needed in the IS field. This urgency is justified by many factors, such as the rapid pace in the rollout of IS tools, technologies and terminologies and the shallow focus on research in most IS curricula. Our study adds to existing literature in at least two aspects. First, to our best knowledge, this is the first reported study that reflects upon the integration of research into teaching within the IS context. Second, our research is a first initiative that contributes to establishing a formal framework for the planning and the assessment of such integration. Such an assessment framework will be very useful for continuous improvement to ensure that the integration achieves the learning outcomes it was designed for. Based on the proposed assessment framework and research methodology, this research proposes multiple sources of evidence to assess the merits of incorporating IS research into undergraduate teaching. The paper also shares the experience of a three-semester case study that aimed to diffuse research into teaching in an undergraduate computing and information systems course. Our research underlines the need for formal frameworks to assess the learning outcomes of undergraduate research dissemination into the curriculum. Objectives, performance criteria and measurement indicators should be clearly defined. Careful planning, judicious implementation, based on best practices and thorough assessment, are some basic ingredients for successful integration of research into the classroom. These requirements need to be integrated in the overall assessment strategy of the program curriculum. The assessment tools and research methods presented in this study can be very useful in assisting other IS departments establish a permeable boundary between undergraduate teaching and research.

[1]  Yousif Mustafa A Systematic Framework for Conducting Research Projects in Undergraduate Courses , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[2]  E. Boyer Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[3]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Management Information Systems Research: What's There in a Methodology? , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  John Jonides,et al.  Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Studen Retention , 1998 .

[5]  R. Griffiths Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: the case of the built environment disciplines , 2004 .

[6]  E. Seymour,et al.  Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study , 2004 .

[7]  Ray Gordon Research and knowledge at work: Perspectives, case studies and innovative strategies , 2001 .

[8]  Faouzi Kamoun,et al.  Designing Large-Scale ASTN-Based Optical Mesh Networks , 2005, Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning , 2007 .

[10]  Peter DePasquale,et al.  A model for summer undergraduate research experiences in emerging technologies , 2006, SIGCSE '06.

[11]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relationship Between Research and Teaching: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[12]  W. Brad Johnson,et al.  Documenting the Benefits of Undergraduate Mentoring , 2000 .

[13]  A. Astin What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[14]  Carl Wieman,et al.  Integrating Research into Undergraduate Education: The Value Added , 2004 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[16]  D. Tsichritzis The dynamics of innovation , 1997 .

[17]  John Garrick,et al.  Research and Knowledge at Work: Prospectives, Case-Studies and Innovative Strategies , 2000 .

[18]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  J. Tagg The learning paradigm college , 2003 .

[20]  Barry J. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Regulation Differences during Athletic Practice by Experts, Non-Experts, and Novices , 2001 .

[21]  R. Murray Research and teaching: beyond the divide , 2008 .

[22]  Joan Peckham,et al.  Using undergraduate interdisciplinary research to promote computer science , 2007 .

[23]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[24]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students : findings and insights from twenty years of research , 1992 .

[25]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A new social contract for research , 1997, CACM.

[26]  John Ishiyama,et al.  Does Early Participation in Undergraduate Research Benefit Social Science and Humanities Students , 2002 .

[27]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..