Rationalising inefficiency: Staff utilisation in branches of a large Canadian bank

In this paper we consider staffing decisions in branches of a large Canadian bank. The bank has well-developed staffing models and the branches work in a highly competitive environment. One would therefore expect limited ‘inefficiency’ in the sense of wasted resources and over-staffing. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) we nevertheless find considerable ‘inefficiency’ which raises the question whether this is best interpreted as waste or if the apparent inefficiency may serve other purposes. To investigate this, we invoke the theoretical framework of rational inefficiency (Bogetoft and Hougaard [8]).

[1]  Yew-Kwang Ng,et al.  Monopoly, X-Efficiency and the Measurement of Welfare Loss , 1972 .

[2]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance: Modeling Considerations and Approaches , 2004 .

[3]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Financial Institutions Center Inside the Black Box : What Makes a Bank Efficient ? , 1998 .

[4]  K. Matthews,et al.  Rational Inefficiency and non-performing loans in Chinese Banking: A non-parametric Bootstrapping Approach , 2007 .

[5]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Labor-use efficiency in Indian banking: A branch-level analysis , 2009 .

[6]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[7]  Mette Asmild,et al.  Combining DEA Window Analysis with the Malmquist Index Approach in a Study of the Canadian Banking Industry , 2004 .

[8]  L. Weill.  Measuring Cost Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Techniques , 2004 .

[9]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Commercial branch performance evaluation and results communication in a Canadian bank--a DEA application , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[11]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Performance measurement with classification information: an enhanced additive DEA model☆ , 2003 .

[12]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[13]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  D. Luenberger.  Benefit functions and duality , 1992 .

[15]  W. Cook,et al.  Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches , 2000 .

[16]  Rolf Färe,et al.  New directions : efficiency and productivity , 2004 .

[17]  S. Zenios,et al.  Performance of financial institutions : efficiency, innovation, regulation , 2000 .

[18]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research , 1997 .

[19]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions , 2002 .

[20]  G. Stigler.  The Xistence of X-Efficiency , 1976 .

[21]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[22]  W. Cook,et al.  Sales performance measurement in bank branches , 2001 .

[23]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  Efficiency Evaluations Based on Potential (Non-Proportional) Improvements , 1999 .

[24]  J. Paradi,et al.  Best practice analysis of bank branches: An application of DEA in a large Canadian bank , 1997 .

[25]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[27]  Mette Asmild,et al.  Rationalising DEA Estimated Inefficiencies , 2009 .