Vegetation-plot data and databases in Europe: an overview

During the last decade many electronic databases of vegetation plots, mainly phytosociological releves, were established in different European countries. These databases contain information which is extremely valuable for both testing various macroecological hypotheses and for nature conservation surveying or monitoring. The aim of this paper is to provide estimates of the number of vegetation plots there are in Europe, how many are stored in an electronic format and to assess their distribution across European countries and regions.We sent a questionnaire to the managers of national or regional databases of vegetation plots and other prominent vegetation ecologists. Meta-data obtained in this way indicate that there are > 4,300,000 vegetation-plot records in Europe, of which > 1,800,000 are already stored electronically. Of the electronic plots, 60% are stored in TURBOVEG databases. Most plot records probably exist in Germany, the Netherlands, France, Poland, Spain, Czech Republic, Italy, UK, Switzerland and Austria. The largest numbers of plots per unit area are in the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and countries of central Europe. The most computerized plots per country exist in the Netherlands (600,000), followed by France, the Czech Republic and the UK. Due to its strong phytosociological tradition, Europe has many more vegetation plots than any other part of the world. This wealth of unique ecological information is a challenge for future biodiversity studies. With the alarming loss in biodiversity and environmental problems like global warming and ongoing changes in land use, there is an urgent need for wide-scale scientific and applied vegetation research. Developments of information systems such as SynBioSys Europe and facilitation of data flow between the national and regional databases should make it easier to use these vegetation-plot data.

[1]  Caspar A. Mücher,et al.  Modelling the spatial distribution of Natura 2000 habitats across Europe , 2009 .

[2]  J. Šibík,et al.  Current knowledge and phytosociological data on the high-altitude vegetation in the Western Carpathians — a review , 2009, Biologia.

[3]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats , 2009 .

[4]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Dispersal failure contributes to plant losses in NW Europe. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[5]  P. Marquet,et al.  A Significant Upward Shift in Plant Species Optimum Elevation During the 20th Century , 2008, Science.

[6]  Xavier Font,et al.  Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe , 2008 .

[7]  L. Mucina.  Conspectus of classes of European vegetation , 1997, Folia Geobotanica.

[8]  M. Chytrý.  17th International Workshop European Vegetation Survey. Usingphytosociological data to address ecological questions. 1-5 May2008, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Abstracts andExcursion Guides , 2008 .

[9]  J. Schaminée,et al.  Use of the ecological information system SynBioSys for the analysis of large datasets , 2007 .

[10]  M. Janišová,et al.  PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL DATABASE OF SLOVAK GRASSLAND VEGETATION , 2007 .

[11]  F. Horváth,et al.  HUNGARIAN PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL DATABASE (COENODATRE F): SAMPLING METHODOLOGY, NOMENCLATURE AND ITS ACTUAL STAGE , 2007 .

[12]  M. Pärtel,et al.  WORKING GROUP ON DRY GRASSLANDS IN THE NORDIC AND BALTIC REGION - OUTLINE OF THE PROJECT AND FIRST RESULTS FOR THE CLASS FESTUCO-BROMETEA , 2006 .

[13]  J. Gégout,et al.  EcoPlant: A forest site database linking floristic data with soil and climate variables , 2005 .

[14]  Renée M. Bekker,et al.  Predictability of plant species composition from environmental conditions is constrained by dispersal limitation , 2005 .

[15]  J. Schaminée,et al.  Dispersal potential in plant communities depends on environmental conditions , 2004 .

[16]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  Twenty years of numerical syntaxonomy , 1989, Vegetatio.

[17]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation , 2003 .

[18]  J Sheail,et al.  Assessing stock and change in land cover and biodiversity in GB: an introduction to Countryside Survey 2000. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  R. Clarke,et al.  National-scale vegetation change across Britain; an analysis of sample-based surveillance data from the Countryside Surveys of 1990 and 1998. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data Česká národní fytocenologická databáze: základní statistika dostupných snímkových dat , 2003 .

[21]  M. Chytrý,et al.  The database of the Western Carpathian forest vegetation , 2003 .

[22]  Lubomír Tichý,et al.  JUICE, software for vegetation classification , 2002 .

[23]  D. Moss,et al.  The Diversity of European Vegetation: an overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats , 2002 .

[24]  J. Schaminée,et al.  TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data , 2001 .

[25]  F. Jansen,et al.  Die Pflanzengesellschaften Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns und ihre Gefährdung , 2001 .

[26]  A national vegetation database for South Africa. , 2012 .

[27]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  Common data standards for recording relevés in field survey for vegetation classification. , 2000 .

[28]  J. S. Rodwell,et al.  British Plant Communities: British Plant Communities , 2000 .

[29]  Thomas Raus,et al.  Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas / Map of the Natural Vegetation of Europe - Maßstab / Scale 1:2,500,000 , 2000 .

[30]  D. A. Ratcliffe,et al.  British Plant Communities, Volume 1: Woodlands and Scrub , 1998 .

[31]  J. Vigo,et al.  El mostratge fitocenològic a Catalunya. , 1998 .

[32]  J. Schaminée,et al.  Update of the installation of Turboveg in Europe , 1996 .

[33]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  European Vegetation Survey: update on progress , 1995 .

[34]  H. Brisse.  THE PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL DATABASE "SOPHY" , 1995 .

[35]  A. Zuidhoff.  THE CYNOSURION CRISTATI TX.1947 OF CENTRAL, SOUTHERN AND WESTERN EUROPE: A TENTATIVE OVERVIEW, BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL RELEVES , 1995 .

[36]  X. Font.  A REGIONAL PROJECT FOR DRAWING UP INVENTORIES OF FLORA AND VEGETATION IN CATALONIA (SPAIN) , 1995 .

[37]  J. Rodwell.  THE EUROPEAN VEGETATION SURVEY QUESTIONNARE: AN OVERVIEW OF PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL DATA, VEGETATION SURVEY PROGRAMMES AND DATABASES IN EUROPE , 1995 .

[38]  V. Westhoff,et al.  De Vegetatie van Nederland; deel 1: Inleiding tot de plantensociologie - grondslagen, methoden en toepassingen , 1995 .

[39]  V. Westhoff,et al.  De Vegetatie van Nederland. Deel 2: Plantengemeenschappen van wateren, moerassen en natte heiden , 1995 .

[40]  D. A. Ratcliffe,et al.  British plant communities. Volume 3. Grasslands and montane communities. , 1994 .

[41]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  European vegetation survey: current state of some national programmes. , 1993 .

[42]  M. Thomas.  British plant communities. Volume 2. Mires and heaths: Edited by J. S. Rodwell. Pp. 628. Cambridge University Press. 1991. £95.00. US $195.00 ISBN 0 521 39165 2 , 1992 .

[43]  T. Wohlgemuth.  Die vegetationskundliche Datenbank , 1992 .

[44]  S. Pignatti.  Towards a Prodrome of plant communities , 1990 .

[45]  E. Maarel,et al.  The Braun-Blanquet Approach , 1978 .

[46]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[47]  J. Braun-Blanquet,et al.  Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde. , 1967 .