Switching Dynamics in an Interpersonal Competition Brings about “Deadlock” Synchronization of Players

In competitive sport game behavior, certain interpersonal patterns of movement coordination evolve even though each individual player only intends to exert their own strategy to win. To investigate this interpersonal pattern formation process, we asked pairs of naïve participants to engage in a play-tag game in which they had to remove a tag fastened to their partner's hip. Relative phase analysis of the players' step towards-away velocities indicated that anti-phase synchronization evolved across 10 repetitions of the game. We clarified evolution of this synchronization process using a dynamical model with an attractor (at relative phase) and a repeller (at relative phase) and discuss the self-organized nature of model and its ability to embody general solution for martial art interpersonal coordination.

[1]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990 .

[2]  J. Wooders,et al.  Minimax Play at Wimbledon , 2001 .

[3]  J. Pantaleone,et al.  Synchronization of metronomes , 2002 .

[4]  Sara J Gilliland,et al.  Interpersonal synchronization during side by side treadmill walking is influenced by leg length differential and altered sensory feedback. , 2009, Human movement science.

[5]  Craig W. Reynolds.  Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  C. Buss,et al.  Children's Brain Development Benefits from Longer Gestation , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[7]  Paula Fitzpatrick,et al.  Understanding social motor coordination. , 2011, Human movement science.

[8]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[9]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Joint action in a cooperative precision task: nested processes of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. II. A/lgorithms and applications , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  J. Kelso,et al.  Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[12]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  A dynamical analysis of tennis: Concepts and data , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[13]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players Are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer , 2002 .

[15]  Masashige Taguchi,et al.  Rainbow trout consume less oxygen in turbulence: the energetics of swimming behaviors at different speeds , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  R. Huerta,et al.  Winnerless competition principle and prediction of the transient dynamics in a Lotka-Volterra model. , 2008, Chaos.

[17]  David P. Swain,et al.  Exercise Prescription: A Case Study Approach to the ACSM Guidelines , 2001 .

[18]  G. Lauder,et al.  Fish Exploiting Vortices Decrease Muscle Activity , 2003, Science.

[19]  Shih-Hsun Hsu,et al.  Minimax Play at Wimbledon: Comment , 2007 .

[20]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Some Causes of the Variable Shape of Flocks of Birds , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  Y. Kerlirzin,et al.  Interpersonal distance modeling during fighting activities. , 2010, Motor control.

[22]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2007, Human movement science.

[24]  Yuji Yamamoto,et al.  Three People Can Synchronize as Coupled Oscillators during Sports Activities , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  A. Opstal.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[26]  S Stöcker,et al.  Models for tuna school formation. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[27]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Motor coordination: when two have to act as one , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Nash Equilibria in Multi-Agent Motor Interactions , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  M. Droz,et al.  Extinction dynamics of Lotka-Volterra ecosystems on evolving networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Interpersonal Synergies , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[32]  O. Volij,et al.  Experientia Docet: Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments ∗ , 2008 .

[33]  P. Keller,et al.  The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  G. Ermentrout.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997 .

[35]  Heidi M. Rockwood,et al.  Huygens's clocks , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. I. Fundamentals , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[37]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[38]  M. Karvonen,et al.  The effects of training on heart rate; a longitudinal study. , 1957, Annales medicinae experimentalis et biologiae Fenniae.