Recombination, RNA evolution, and bifunctional RNA molecules isolated through chimeric SELEX.

Exchange of RNA structural domains through recombination can be used to engineer RNAs with novel functions and may have played an important role in the early evolution of life. The degree of function an RNA element retains upon recombination into a new sequence context is a measure of how deleterious or beneficial recombination will be. When we fused pairs of aptamers previously selected to bind coenzyme A, chloramphenicol, or adenosine, the chimerae retained some ability to bind both targets, but with reduced binding activity both in solution and on affinity resins, probably due to misfolding. Complex populations of recombined RNAs gave similar results. Applying dual selection pressure to recombined populations yielded the combinations that were best suited to binding both targets. Most reselected RNAs folded into the active conformation more readily than chimerae built from arbitrarily chosen aptamers, as indicated both by solution Kd measurements and affinity resin binding activity. Deletion/selection experiments confirmed that the sequences required for binding are fully contained within the respective domains and not derived from interaction between the domains, consistent with the modular architecture of their original design. The combinatorial nature of the recombination methods presented here takes advantage of the full sequence diversity of the starting populations and yields large numbers of bifunctional molecules (10(6) to more than 1012). The method can be easily generalized and should be applicable to engineering dual-function RNAs for a wide variety of applications, including catalysis, novel therapeutics, and studies of long-range RNA structure.

[1]  C. Wilson,et al.  Stimulation and suppression of PCR-mediated recombination. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  D. H. Burke,et al.  A novel acidophilic RNA motif that recognizes coenzyme A. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[3]  W. Stemmer,et al.  DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution , 1998, Nature.

[4]  L. Gold,et al.  RNA aptamers to the peptidyl transferase inhibitor chloramphenicol. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.

[5]  D. Bartel,et al.  Accessing rare activities from random RNA sequences: the importance of the length of molecules in the starting pool. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.

[6]  S. Strobel,et al.  RNA seeing double: close-packing of helices in RNA tertiary structure. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  R R Breaker,et al.  Rational design of allosteric ribozymes. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.

[8]  N. Pace,et al.  Analysis of the tertiary structure of the ribonuclease P ribozyme-substrate complex by site-specific photoaffinity crosslinking. , 1997, RNA.

[9]  L. Gold,et al.  RNA aptamers to the adenosine moiety of S-adenosyl methionine: structural inferences from variations on a theme and the reproducibility of SELEX. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  G. F. Joyce,et al.  Continuous in vitro evolution of catalytic function. , 1997, Science.

[11]  D. Engelke,et al.  Nuclear pre-tRNA terminal structure and RNase P recognition. , 1997, RNA.

[12]  S J de Souza,et al.  Intron positions correlate with module boundaries in ancient proteins. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  C. Kundrot,et al.  RNA Tertiary Structure Mediation by Adenosine Platforms , 1996, Science.

[14]  R. Kontermann,et al.  A strategy of exon shuffling for making large peptide repertoires displayed on filamentous bacteriophage. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Famulok,et al.  A novel RNA motif for neomycin recognition. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[16]  Jack W. Szostak,et al.  In vitro evolution of a self-alkylatlng ribozyme , 1995, Nature.

[17]  J. Doudna,et al.  Self-assembly of a group I intron active site from its component tertiary structural domains. , 1995, RNA.

[18]  G. F. Joyce,et al.  Cleavage of an amide bond by a ribozyme , 1995, Science.

[19]  S. Altman,et al.  Substrate recognition by human RNase P: identification of small, model substrates for the enzyme. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[20]  J. Rossi,et al.  A chimeric tRNA(Lys3)-ribozyme inhibits HIV replication following virion assembly. , 1995, Nucleic acids symposium series.

[21]  R. Doolittle The multiplicity of domains in proteins. , 1995, Annual review of biochemistry.

[22]  W. Stemmer DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Jon R. Lorsch,et al.  In vitro evolution of new ribozymes with polynucleotide kinase activity , 1994, Nature.

[24]  W. Stemmer Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling , 1994, Nature.

[25]  P. Burgstaller,et al.  Isolation of RNA Aptamers for Biological Cofactors by In Vitro Selection , 1994 .

[26]  G. F. Joyce,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of the catalytic properties of a DNA-cleaving ribozyme. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[27]  A. Pardi,et al.  High-resolution molecular discrimination by RNA. , 1994, Science.

[28]  W. Gilbert,et al.  On the ancient nature of introns. , 1993, Gene.

[29]  N. Lehman,et al.  Evolution in vitro of an RNA enzyme with altered metal dependence , 1993, Nature.

[30]  A D Ellington,et al.  Experimental testing of theories of an early RNA world. , 1993, Methods in enzymology.

[31]  L. Gold,et al.  RNA pseudoknots that inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  G. F. Joyce,et al.  Directed evolution of an RNA enzyme. , 1992, Science.