Improving dynamic proximity sensing and processing for smart work-zone safety

Abstract Equipment/vehicles striking workers is one of the most frequent accidents that occur in roadway workzones. As a means of prevention, a number of active technologies have been developed to provide proximity sensing and alerts for workers and equipment operators. However, most of these systems are based on the distance/proximity level between workers and equipment and neglect the variations caused by different settings and environmental conditions, such as equipment types and approaching speeds, which can result in inconsistency and delay of the systems. As of yet, previous research has insufficiently investigated these issues. This research addresses the issues by utilizing the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)-based proximity sensing and alert system developed by the authors. This paper discusses the development and assessment of parameter adjustment and adaptive signal processing (ASP) methods. The research conducted field trials in various dynamic conditions and settings to assess the performance of the system. The test results showed that the parameter adjustment function reduced the inconsistency of the alert distances resulting from different types of equipment, and that the ASP method reduced the time delay resulting from high approaching speeds. The developed proximity safety alerts system provides stakeholders with better understanding of dynamic spatial relationships among equipment, operator, workers, and a surrounding work environment; thus, improving construction work zone safety.

[1]  Yong K. Cho,et al.  Direction Aware Bluetooth Low Energy Based Proximity Detection System for Construction Work Zone Safety , 2016 .

[2]  Eric Marks,et al.  Method for testing proximity detection and alert technology for safe construction equipment operation , 2013 .

[3]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  An iBeacon primer for indoor localization: demo abstract , 2014, BuildSys@SenSys.

[4]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Attribute-Based Safety Risk Assessment. I: Analysis at the Fundamental Level , 2015 .

[5]  Tomohiro Yoshida,et al.  Application of RFID technology to prevention of collision accident with heavy equipment , 2010 .

[6]  Yong K. Cho,et al.  A BIM and UWB integrated Mobile Robot Navigation System for Indoor Position Tracking Applications , 2016 .

[7]  Eric Marks,et al.  Mobile Proximity Sensing Technologies for Personnel and Equipment Safety in Work Zones , 2015 .

[8]  Yong K. Cho,et al.  Error modeling for an untethered ultra-wideband system for construction indoor asset tracking , 2010 .

[9]  Jun Wang,et al.  Low False Alarm Rate Model for Unsafe-Proximity Detection in Construction , 2016 .

[10]  Vitor Sousa,et al.  Risk-based management of occupational safety and health in the construction industry – Part 1: Background knowledge , 2014 .

[11]  S. W. Roberts Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages , 2000 .

[12]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Autonomous pro-active real-time construction worker and equipment operator proximity safety alert system , 2010 .

[13]  Xiaochun Luo,et al.  A field experiment of workers' responses to proximity warnings of static safety hazards on construction sites , 2016 .

[14]  Amin Hammad,et al.  Dynamic equipment workspace generation for improving earthwork safety using real-time location system , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[15]  Eric Marks,et al.  Performance Test of Wireless Technologies for Personnel and Equipment Proximity Sensing in Work Zones , 2015 .

[16]  Yong K. Cho,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Probabilistic Local Search Algorithm for Complex Dynamic Indoor Construction Sites , 2017, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[17]  Eric Marks,et al.  Hazardous Proximity Zone Design for Heavy Construction Excavation Equipment , 2016 .

[18]  Yong K. Cho,et al.  Framework of Automated Construction-Safety Monitoring Using Cloud-Enabled BIM and BLE Mobile Tracking Sensors , 2017 .

[19]  Heng Li,et al.  Stochastic state sequence model to predict construction site safety states through Real-Time Location Systems , 2016 .

[20]  Venkata N. Padmanabhan,et al.  Indoor localization without the pain , 2010, MobiCom.

[21]  Berardo Naticchia,et al.  A proactive system for real-time safety management in construction sites , 2009 .

[22]  Hyunsoo Kim,et al.  Automated hazardous area identification using laborers' actual and optimal routes , 2016 .

[23]  Yong K. Cho,et al.  A Wireless Tracking System Integrated with BIM for Indoor Construction Applications , 2016 .

[24]  Jun Wang,et al.  Two 4D Models Effective in Reducing False Alarms for Struck-by-Equipment Hazard Prevention , 2016, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[25]  Arash Shahi,et al.  Deterioration of UWB positioning during construction , 2012 .

[26]  Hazar Dib,et al.  Structural Equation Model of Building Information Modeling Maturity , 2016 .

[27]  Stefano Chessa,et al.  A stigmergic approach to indoor localization using Bluetooth Low Energy beacons , 2015, 2015 12th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS).