Compression in Working Memory and Its Relationship With Fluid Intelligence.

Working memory has been shown to be strongly related to fluid intelligence; however, our goal is to shed further light on the process of information compression in working memory as a determining factor of fluid intelligence. Our main hypothesis was that compression in working memory is an excellent indicator for studying the relationship between working-memory capacity and fluid intelligence because both depend on the optimization of storage capacity. Compressibility of memoranda was estimated using an algorithmic complexity metric. The results showed that compressibility can be used to predict working-memory performance and that fluid intelligence is well predicted by the ability to compress information. We conclude that the ability to compress information in working memory is the reason why both manipulation and retention of information are linked to intelligence. This result offers a new concept of intelligence based on the idea that compression and intelligence are equivalent problems.

[1]  Nicolas Gauvrit,et al.  Structure emerges faster during cultural transmission in children than in adults , 2015, Cognition.

[2]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: the gap is not that deep. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Hector Zenil,et al.  Algorithmic complexity for psychology: a user-friendly implementation of the coding theorem method , 2016, Behavior research methods.

[4]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[5]  T. Salthouse.  Relations between Running Memory and Fluid Intelligence. , 2014, Intelligence.

[6]  S. Dieguez,et al.  Nothing Happens by Accident, or Does It? A Low Prior for Randomness Does Not Explain Belief in Conspiracy Theories , 2015, Psychological science.

[7]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[8]  Nicolas Gauvrit,et al.  A preference for some types of complexity comment on "perceived beauty of random texture patterns: A preference for complexity". , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[9]  F. Mathy,et al.  Chunk formation in immediate memory and how it relates to data compression , 2016, Cognition.

[10]  R. Engle,et al.  On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  J. Rissanen,et al.  Modeling By Shortest Data Description* , 1978, Autom..

[12]  F. Mathy,et al.  What’s magic about magic numbers? Chunking and data compression in short-term memory , 2012, Cognition.

[13]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  Jean-Paul Delahaye,et al.  Correspondence and Independence of Numerical Evaluations of Algorithmic Information Measures , 2012, Comput..

[15]  David J. Therriault,et al.  A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .

[16]  Hector Zenil,et al.  Natural scene statistics mediate the perception of image complexity , 2014, ArXiv.

[17]  Dr. Marcus Hutter,et al.  Universal artificial intelligence , 2004 .

[18]  Jean-Paul Delahaye,et al.  Calculating Kolmogorov Complexity from the Output Frequency Distributions of Small Turing Machines , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  P Brugger,et al.  Repetitive behavior and repetition avoidance: the role of the right hemisphere. , 1996, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[20]  M. Miller,et al.  Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models , 2013, Educational and psychological measurement.

[21]  Ming Li,et al.  An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications , 2019, Texts in Computer Science.

[22]  Bill Macken,et al.  Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning , 2015, Cognition.

[23]  David Lusseau,et al.  Compression as a Universal Principle of Animal Behavior , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Xuezhu Ren,et al.  The modeling of temporary storage and its effect on fluid intelligence: Evidence from both Brown–Peterson and complex span tasks , 2015 .

[25]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Working Memory and Intelligence : The Same or Different Constructs ? , 2005 .

[26]  F. Mathy,et al.  Retention-error patterns in complex alphanumeric serial-recall tasks , 2013, Memory.

[27]  D. Ader,et al.  Formal Thought Disorder, the Type-Token Ratio, and Disturbed Voluntary Motor Movement in Schizophrenia , 1981, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[28]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: the more difficult the item, the more more is better , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[29]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[30]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage , 2009, Memory.

[31]  S. Kirby,et al.  Linguistic structure is an evolutionary trade-off between simplicity and expressivity , 2013, CogSci.

[32]  Eric B. Baum,et al.  What is thought? , 2003 .

[33]  Benoît Lemaire,et al.  MDLChunker: A MDL-Based Cognitive Model of Inductive Learning , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Nick Chater,et al.  The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language , 2015, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Gilles E. Gignac.  The magical numbers 7 and 4 are resistant to the Flynn effect: No evidence for increases in forward or backward recall across 85 years of data , 2015 .

[37]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Linguistic structure is an evolutionary trade-off between simplicity and expressivity , 2013 .

[38]  J. Raven.  Advanced progressive matrices : sets I and II , 1962 .

[39]  Jean-Paul Delahaye,et al.  Numerical evaluation of algorithmic complexity for short strings: A glance into the innermost structure of randomness , 2011, Appl. Math. Comput..

[40]  O. Kvalheim.  Latent Variable , 1992, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  A. Miyake,et al.  Not All Executive Functions Are Related to Intelligence , 2006, Psychological science.

[42]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Using immediate memory span , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Giselle Weiss,et al.  Simplexity: Simplifying Principles for a Complex World , 2012 .

[45]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[47]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  A working memory test battery for MATLAB , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[48]  C. W. Crannell,et al.  A Comparison of Immediate Memory Span for Digits, Letters, and Words , 1957 .

[49]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  An Entropy Model for Artificial Grammar Learning , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[50]  N. Chater,et al.  Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and reasoning ability , 2007 .

[52]  Gilles E. Gignac,et al.  There may be nothing special about the association between working memory capacity and fluid intelligence , 2015 .

[53]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Categorization Under Complexity: A Unified MDL Account of Human Learning of Regular and Irregular Categories , 2002, NIPS.