Mystery of the Unknown: Revisiting Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Literature

Purpose – This study aims to discuss how organizational researchers use the concept of tacit knowledge. The concept has become a “buzzword” in the last decade and has given rise to an extensive literature. The current study views tacit knowledge as a crucial concept that may help link individual understanding and skills and organizational routines and capabilities, a rare topic of discussion in extant literature.Design/methodology/approach – The paper also addresses some of the misunderstandings in the theoretical and empirical organizational literature on tacit knowledge. Organizational researchers usually refer to Michael Polanyi's conception of the term as tacit knowledge, though they mean Gilbert Ryle's concept of “knowing‐how” instead.Findings – Accordingly, the primordial nature of tacit knowing is lost in the transition and what is left is a linear dichotomy of tacit and explicit knowledge.Originality/value – This misunderstanding creates an obstacle in the way toward establishing the link between ...

[1]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[2]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer. , 1996 .

[3]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[4]  Jerry H. Gill,et al.  The Tacit Mode: Michael Polanyi's Postmodern Philosophy , 2000 .

[5]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[6]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia,et al.  Strategy as Practical Coping: A Heideggerian Perspective , 2006 .

[7]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[8]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach: an assessment and a re‐evaluation , 2003 .

[11]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The Economics Of Knowledge: The Debate About Codification And Tacit Knowledge , 2000 .

[12]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[13]  Xavier Martin,et al.  Tacitness, Learning, and International Expansion: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment in a Knowledge-Intensive Industry , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  What is Meant by Tacit Knowledge? Towards a Better Understanding of the Shape of Actions , 2000, ECIS.

[15]  T. Schatzki.  Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[16]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[17]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  If Nelson and Winter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half? A Searlean critique of 'codification' , 2003 .

[18]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Do we really understand tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[19]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[20]  A. Pozzali.  Tacit knowledge, implicit learning and scientific reasoning , 2008 .

[21]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[22]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Knowing and being : essays , 1969 .

[23]  Matthew Hall,et al.  Knowledge management and the limits of knowledge codification , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[24]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Exploring the dichotomies within the tacit knowledge literature: towards a process of tacit knowing in organizations , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  Friedrich A. von Hayek,et al.  The Sensory Order , 1954 .

[26]  Michael Polanyi's post-critical epistemology , 1988 .

[27]  Norman Mooradian,et al.  Tacit knowledge: philosophic roots and role in KM , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[29]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[30]  N. A. D. Connell,et al.  It's tacit knowledge but not as we know it: redirecting the search for knowledge , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[31]  Teppo Felin,et al.  Individuals and Organizations: Thoughts on a Micro-Foundations Project for Strategic Management and Organizational Analysis , 2006 .

[32]  Daniel Geiger.  Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing , 2009 .

[33]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[34]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  A Theory of the Firm's Knowledge-Creation Dynamics , 1998 .

[35]  Fuat Oguz.  Hayek on tacit knowledge , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[36]  S. Dreyfus,et al.  Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[37]  Pierre-André Mangolte,et al.  Articulation and codification of collective know-how in the steel industry: evidence from blast furnace control in France , 2003 .

[38]  H. George.  Progress and poverty , 1879 .

[39]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[40]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[41]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[42]  J. Spender.  COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FROM TACIT KNOWLEDGE? UNPACKING THE CONCEPT AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS. , 1993 .