Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges

Fragility curves for retrofitted bridges indicate the influence of various retrofit measures on the probability of achieving specified levels of damage. This paper presents an analytical methodology for developing fragility curves for classes of retrofitted bridge systems. The approach captures the impact of retrofit on the vulnerability of multiple components, which to date has not been adequately addressed, and results in a comparison of the system fragility before and after the application of different retrofit measures. Details presented include analytical modeling, uncertainty treatment, impact of retrofit on demand models, capacity estimates, and component and system fragility curves. The findings indicate the importance of evaluating the impact of retrofit not only on the targeted response quantity and component vulnerability but also on the overall bridge fragility. As illustrated by the case study of a retrofitted multi-span continuous (MSC) concrete girder bridge class, a given retrofit measure may have a positive impact on some components, yet no impact or a negative impact on other critical components. Consideration of the fragility based only on individual retrofitted components, without regard for the system, may lead to over-estimation or under-estimation of the impact on the bridge fragility. The proposed methodology provides an opportunity to effectively compare the fragility of the MSC concrete bridge retrofit with a range of different retrofit measures. The most effective retrofit in reducing probable damage for a given intensity is a function of the damage state of interest. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Susendar Muthukumar,et al.  A Contact Element Approach with Hysteresis Damping for the Analysis and Design of Pounding in Bridges , 2003 .

[2]  Eunsoo Choi,et al.  Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges , 2002 .

[3]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Three-dimensional nonlinear seismic performance evaluation of retrofit measures for typical steel girder bridges , 2008 .

[4]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Uniform Hazard Ground Motions for Mid-America Cities , 2001 .

[5]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones , 2004 .

[6]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[7]  Frieder Seible,et al.  Steel Jacket Retrofitting of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns for Enhanced Shear Strength--Part 2: Test Results and Comparison With Theory , 1994 .

[8]  Kevin MACKIE,et al.  FRAGILITY CURVES FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE HIGHWAY OVERPASS BRIDGES , 2002 .

[9]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Development of fragility curves of bridges retrofitted by column jacketing , 2004 .

[10]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Modelling considerations in probabilistic performance‐based seismic evaluation: case study of the I‐880 viaduct , 2006 .

[11]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[12]  J. Mander,et al.  Seismic Fragility Curve Theory for Highway Bridges , 1999 .

[13]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios , 2008 .

[14]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[15]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Effect of isolation on fragility curves of highway bridges based on simplified approach , 2007 .

[16]  James E. Moore,et al.  Loss Estimation Due to Seismic Risks to Highway Systems , 1997 .

[17]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Real-Time Loss Estimation as an Emergency Response Decision Support System: The Early Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment Tool (EPEDAT) , 1997 .

[18]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  R-Factor Parameterized Bridge Damage Fragility Curves , 2007 .

[19]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach , 2006 .

[20]  Athol J. Carr,et al.  Behaviour of laminated elastomeric bearings , 1997 .

[21]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model for California Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[22]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Evaluation of Seismic Damage to Memphis Bridges and Highway Systems , 2000 .

[23]  B. Borzi,et al.  Deformation-based vulnerability functions for RC bridges , 2004 .

[24]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF BRIDGE FRAGILITY CURVES , 1998 .

[25]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Nonlinear Static Procedure for Fragility Curve Development , 2000 .

[26]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Bridge Functionality Relationships for Improved Seismic Risk Assessment of Transportation Networks , 2007 .

[27]  B. G. Nielson.  Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones , 2005 .

[28]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Development of Empirical Fragility Curves for Bridges , 1999 .

[29]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Analytical Seismic Fragility Curves for Typical Bridges in the Central and Southeastern United States , 2007 .

[30]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  A simplified method of constructing fragility curves for highway bridges , 2003 .

[31]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Seismic fragility assessment of concrete gravity dams , 2003 .

[32]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Earthquake Damage Assessment of Expressway Bridges in Japan , 1999 .

[33]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  New developments in seismic risk analysis for highway systems , 1998 .

[34]  Athol J. Carr,et al.  The Behavior of Bearings Used for Seismic Isolation under Shear and Axial Load , 1999 .

[35]  F. Seible,et al.  SEISMIC RETROFIT OF CIRCULAR BRIDGE COLUMNS FOR ENHANCED FLEXURAL PERFORMANCE , 1991 .

[36]  Jamie E. Padgett,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Retrofitted Bridges Using Probabilistic Methods , 2007 .

[37]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Seismic Response of Multiple Span Steel Bridges in Central and Southeastern United States. II: Retrofitted , 2004 .