Reinforcement learning of self-regulated β-oscillations for motor restoration in chronic stroke

Neurofeedback training of Motor imagery (MI)-related brain-states with brain-computer/brain-machine interfaces (BCI/BMI) is currently being explored as an experimental intervention prior to standard physiotherapy to improve the motor outcome of stroke rehabilitation. The use of BCI/BMI technology increases the adherence to MI training more efficiently than interventions with sham or no feedback. Moreover, pilot studies suggest that such a priming intervention before physiotherapy might—like some brain stimulation techniques—increase the responsiveness of the brain to the subsequent physiotherapy, thereby improving the general clinical outcome. However, there is little evidence up to now that these BCI/BMI-based interventions have achieved operate conditioning of specific brain states that facilitate task-specific functional gains beyond the practice of primed physiotherapy. In this context, we argue that BCI/BMI technology provides a valuable neurofeedback tool for rehabilitation but needs to aim at physiological features relevant for the targeted behavioral gain. Moreover, this therapeutic intervention has to be informed by concepts of reinforcement learning to develop its full potential. Such a refined neurofeedback approach would need to address the following issues: (1) Defining a physiological feedback target specific to the intended behavioral gain, e.g., β-band oscillations for cortico-muscular communication. This targeted brain state could well be different from the brain state optimal for the neurofeedback task, e.g., α-band oscillations for differentiating MI from rest; (2) Selecting a BCI/BMI classification and thresholding approach on the basis of learning principles, i.e., balancing challenge and reward of the neurofeedback task instead of maximizing the classification accuracy of the difficulty level device; and (3) Adjusting the difficulty level in the course of the training period to account for the cognitive load and the learning experience of the participant. Here, we propose a comprehensive neurofeedback strategy for motor restoration after stroke that addresses these aspects, and provide evidence for the feasibility of the suggested approach by demonstrating that dynamic threshold adaptation based on reinforcement learning may lead to frequency-specific operant conditioning of β-band oscillations paralleled by task-specific motor improvement; a proposal that requires investigation in a larger cohort of stroke patients.

[1]  香川 美仁,et al.  Effects of Robot Assisted Therapy , 2012 .

[2]  I. Toni,et al.  Distinct roles for alpha- and beta-band oscillations during mental simulation of goal-directed actions. , 2014, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Dandan Huang,et al.  Effect of real-time cortical feedback in motor imagery-based mental practice training. , 2014, NeuroRehabilitation.

[4]  J. Ushiba,et al.  Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary case series study. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Learned self-regulation of the lesioned brain with epidural electrocorticography , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[6]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Clinical study of neurorehabilitation in stroke using EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[7]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  W. Byblow,et al.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A Large Clinical Study on the Ability of Stroke Patients to Use an EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[10]  Stuart N Baker,et al.  Contributions of descending and ascending pathways to corticomuscular coherence in humans , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Jose Luis Patino,et al.  Beta-range cortical motor spectral power and corticomuscular coherence as a mechanism for effective corticospinal interaction during steady-state motor output , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Coupling BCI and cortical stimulation for brain-state-dependent stimulation: methods for spectral estimation in the presence of stimulation after-effects , 2012, Front. Neural Circuits.

[14]  V. Caggiano,et al.  Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Julien Doyon,et al.  Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills , 2005 .

[16]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[18]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[19]  Benedikt Zoefel,et al.  Neurofeedback training of the upper alpha frequency band in EEG improves cognitive performance , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke , 2015, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[21]  Helen M. Morgan,et al.  The Role of Beta-Frequency Neural Oscillations in Motor Control , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  A. E. Schulman,et al.  Electroencephalographic measurement of motor cortex control of muscle activity in humans , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  M. Molinari,et al.  Brain–computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[24]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[25]  W. Schnotz,et al.  A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory , 2007 .

[26]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Oscillatory entrainment of the motor cortical network during motor imagery is modulated by the feedback modality , 2015, NeuroImage.

[27]  Y. Prut,et al.  Do sensorimotor β-oscillations maintain muscle synergy representations in primary motor cortex? , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  O. Jensen,et al.  Rhythmic Pulsing: Linking Ongoing Brain Activity with Evoked Responses , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Stuart N Baker,et al.  Manipulation of peripheral neural feedback loops alters human corticomuscular coherence , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Bridging the gap between motor imagery and motor execution with a brain–robot interface , 2015, NeuroImage.

[31]  J. Carmena Advances in Neuroprosthetic Learning and Control , 2013, PLoS biology.

[32]  Matthew Petoe,et al.  The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Reinforcement learning for adaptive threshold control of restorative brain-computer interfaces: a Bayesian simulation , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[34]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Towards a Cure for BCI Illiteracy , 2009, Brain Topography.

[35]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[36]  André J. Szameitat,et al.  Cortical activation during executed, imagined, observed, and passive wrist movements in healthy volunteers and stroke patients , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  David E Thompson,et al.  Performance assessment in brain-computer interface-based augmentative and alternative communication , 2013, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[38]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interface (BCI): model order selection for autoregressive spectral analysis , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[39]  Meigen Liu,et al.  Is event-related desynchronization a biomarker representing corticospinal excitability? , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[40]  Linda Allal,et al.  Assessment "of"- or "in"- the Zone of Proximal Development. , 2000 .

[41]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Lateralized alpha-band cortical networks regulate volitional modulation of beta-band sensorimotor oscillations , 2014, NeuroImage.

[42]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Neural synchrony within the motor system: what have we learned so far? , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  Timothy Bardouille,et al.  Laterality of brain activity during motor imagery is modulated by the provision of source level neurofeedback , 2014, NeuroImage.

[44]  Maureen Clerc,et al.  An analysis of performance evaluation for motor-imagery based BCI , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[45]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  J. Peters,et al.  Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[47]  José del R. Millán,et al.  BCI2000: A General-Purpose Software Platform for BCI , 2007 .

[48]  G. Prasad,et al.  Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[49]  J. Ushiba,et al.  Event-related desynchronization reflects downregulation of intracortical inhibition in human primary motor cortex. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  U. Halsband,et al.  Motor learning in man: A review of functional and clinical studies , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[51]  E. Plow,et al.  Invasive Neurostimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, Neurotherapeutics.

[52]  E. E. Fetz,et al.  Interfacing With the Computational Brain , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[53]  A. Eagger Rehabilitation , 1960 .

[54]  John-Stuart Brittain,et al.  The highs and lows of beta activity in cortico-basal ganglia loops , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[55]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[56]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Coupling brain-machine interfaces with cortical stimulation for brain-state dependent stimulation: enhancing motor cortex excitability for neurorehabilitation , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  Andrea A. Kühn,et al.  Beta-band amplitude oscillations in the human internal globus pallidus support the encoding of sequence boundaries during initial sensorimotor sequence learning , 2014, NeuroImage.

[58]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  A Closed-Loop Brain–Computer Interface Triggering an Active Ankle–Foot Orthosis for Inducing Cortical Neural Plasticity , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[59]  Qing Gao,et al.  Evaluation of effective connectivity of motor areas during motor imagery and execution using conditional Granger causality , 2011, NeuroImage.

[60]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Peripheral Electrical Stimulation Triggered by Self-Paced Detection of Motor Intention Enhances Motor Evoked Potentials , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[61]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[62]  M. Hallett,et al.  A high performance sensorimotor beta rhythm-based brain–computer interface associated with human natural motor behavior , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[63]  J. Doyon,et al.  Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[64]  V. Krause,et al.  Changes of motor-cortical oscillations associated with motor learning , 2014, Neuroscience.

[65]  M J Safrit,et al.  Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[66]  Nick S. Ward,et al.  Do movement-related beta oscillations change after stroke? , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Is More Better? Using Metadata to Explore Dose–Response Relationships in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2014, Stroke.

[68]  D. Farina,et al.  Precise temporal association between cortical potentials evoked by motor imagination and afference induces cortical plasticity , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[69]  Domenico Formica,et al.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation , 2014, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[70]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Estimating cognitive load during self-regulation of brain activity and neurofeedback with therapeutic brain-computer interfaces , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[71]  A. Gharabaghi,et al.  From assistance towards restoration with an implanted brain-computer interface based on epidural electrocorticography : A single case study , 2014 .