Hourglass Arrays and Other Novel 2-D Sparse Arrays With Reduced Mutual Coupling

Linear [one-dimensional (1-D)] sparse arrays such as nested arrays and minimum redundancy arrays have hole-free difference coarrays with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(N^2)$</tex-math></inline-formula> virtual sensor elements, where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$</tex-math></inline-formula> is the number of physical sensors. The hole-free property makes it easier to perform beamforming and DOA estimation in the coarray domain which behaves like an uniform linear array. The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(N^2)$</tex-math> </inline-formula> property implies that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(N^2)$</tex-math></inline-formula> uncorrelated sources can be identified. For the 2-D case, planar sparse arrays with hole-free coarrays having <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(N^2)$</tex-math></inline-formula> elements have also been known for a long time. These include billboard arrays, open box arrays (OBA), and 2-D nested arrays. Their merits are similar to those of the 1-D sparse arrays mentioned above, although identifiability claims regarding <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(N^2)$</tex-math></inline-formula> sources have to be handled with more care in 2-D. This paper introduces new planar sparse arrays with hole-free coarrays having <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX"> $O(N^2)$</tex-math></inline-formula> elements just like the OBA, with the additional property that the number of sensor pairs with small spacings such as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda /2$</tex-math></inline-formula> decreases, reducing the effect of mutual coupling. The new arrays include half-open box arrays, half-open box arrays with two layers, and hourglass arrays. Among these, simulations show that hourglass arrays have the best estimation performance in presence of mutual coupling.

[1]  John R. Buck,et al.  Extending coprime sensor arrays to achieve the peak side lobe height of a full uniform linear array , 2014, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[2]  R. T. Hoctor,et al.  The unifying role of the coarray in aperture synthesis for coherent and incoherent imaging , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[3]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory , 2002 .

[4]  Wei Cui,et al.  Extension of Co-Prime Arrays Based on the Fourth-Order Difference Co-Array Concept , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Coprime sampling and the music algorithm , 2011, 2011 Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting (DSP/SPE).

[6]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Direct-MUSIC on sparse arrays , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM).

[7]  Moeness G. Amin,et al.  Mutual coupling effect and compensation in non-uniform arrays for direction-of-arrival estimation , 2017, Digit. Signal Process..

[8]  Yimin Zhang,et al.  Generalized Coprime Array Configurations for Direction-of-Arrival Estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Nested Arrays in Two Dimensions, Part II: Application in Two Dimensional Array Processing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  A. Moffet Minimum-redundancy linear arrays , 1968 .

[11]  Thomas Svantesson,et al.  Modeling and estimation of mutual coupling in a uniform linear array of dipoles , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[12]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Sparse Sensing With Co-Prime Samplers and Arrays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Two-dimensional sparse arrays with hole-free coarray and reduced mutual coupling , 2016, 2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[14]  Chong-Yung Chi,et al.  DOA Estimation of Quasi-Stationary Signals With Less Sensors Than Sources and Unknown Spatial Noise Covariance: A Khatri–Rao Subspace Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Charles R. Greene,et al.  Sparse array performance , 1977 .

[16]  M. Skolnik,et al.  Introduction to Radar Systems , 2021, Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.

[17]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Direction of Arrival Estimation Using Co-Prime Arrays: A Super Resolution Viewpoint , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Michael D. Zoltowski,et al.  Closed-form 2-D angle estimation with rectangular arrays in element space or beamspace via unitary ESPRIT , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Almost-sure identifiability of multidimensional harmonic retrieval , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[20]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Nested Arrays in Two Dimensions, Part I: Geometrical Considerations , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  Direction finding in the presence of mutual coupling , 1991 .

[22]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Nested Arrays: A Novel Approach to Array Processing With Enhanced Degrees of Freedom , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Super Nested Arrays: Linear Sparse Arrays With Reduced Mutual Coupling—Part II: High-Order Extensions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[24]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Remarks on the Spatial Smoothing Step in Coarray MUSIC , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[25]  T. Svantesson,et al.  Mutual coupling compensation using subspace fitting , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop. SAM 2000 (Cat. No.00EX410).

[26]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Super Nested Arrays: Linear Sparse Arrays With Reduced Mutual Coupling—Part I: Fundamentals , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[27]  Athanassios Manikas,et al.  Differential Geometry In Array Processing , 2004 .