Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly.

Stochastic niche theory resolves many of the differences between neutral theory and classical tradeoff-based niche theories of resource competition and community structure. In stochastic niche theory, invading species become established only if propagules can survive stochastic mortality while growing to maturity on the resources left unconsumed by established species. The theory makes three predictions about community structure. First, stochastic niche assembly creates communities in which species dominate approximately equally wide "slices" of the habitat's spatial heterogeneity. These niche widths generate realistic distributions of species relative abundances for which, contrary to neutral theory but consistent with numerous observations, there are strong correlations among species traits, species abundances, and environmental conditions. Second, slight decreases in resource levels are predicted to cause large decreases in the probability that a propagule would survive to be an adult. These decreases cause local diversity to be limited by the inhibitory effects of resource use by established species on the establishment (recruitment) of potential invaders. If resource pulses or disturbance allowed invaders to overcome this recruitment limitation, many more species could indefinitely coexist. Third, the low invasibility of high diversity communities is predicted to result not from diversity per se, but from the uniformly low levels of resources that occur in high-diversity communities created by stochastic competitive assembly. This prediction provides a potential solution to the invasion paradox, which is the tendency for highly diverse regions to be more heavily invaded.

[1]  John Harte,et al.  Ecology: Tail of death and resurrection , 2003, Nature.

[2]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology , 2003, Nature.

[3]  Cynthia S. Brown,et al.  Community assembly and invasion: An experimental test of neutral versus niche processes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  James S. Clark,et al.  Stability of forest biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[5]  B. McGill A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[6]  A. Magurran,et al.  Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions , 2003, Nature.

[7]  Ian J. Renne,et al.  The rich get richer – responses , 2003 .

[8]  James H Brown,et al.  Species Invasions Exceed Extinctions on Islands Worldwide: A Comparative Study of Plants and Birds , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[9]  David Tilman,et al.  Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion , 2002, Nature.

[10]  J. Whitfield Ecology: Neutrality versus the niche , 2002, Nature.

[11]  Michael D. Collins,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2002 .

[12]  S. Levin,et al.  Comparing Classical Community Models: Theoretical Consequences for Patterns of Diversity , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[13]  S Pacala,et al.  Long-Term Studies of Vegetation Dynamics , 2001, Science.

[14]  David Tilman,et al.  Biodiversity, Stability, and Productivity in Competitive Communities , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[15]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[16]  David Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors , 2000 .

[17]  N. Brokaw,et al.  Niche versus chance and tree diversity in forest gaps. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  Graham Bell,et al.  The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral Communities , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. , 2000 .

[20]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Jonathan M. Levine,et al.  Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility , 1999 .

[22]  P. Reich,et al.  Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. , 1999, Ecology letters.

[23]  D. Tilman THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[24]  R. Duncan The Role of Competition and Introduction Effort in the Success of Passeriform Birds Introduced to New Zealand , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[25]  David Tilman,et al.  COMMUNITY INVASIBILITY, RECRUITMENT LIMITATION, AND GRASSLAND BIODIVERSITY , 1997 .

[26]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[27]  J. P. Grime,et al.  An Experimental Study of Plant Community Invasibility , 1996 .

[28]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants , 1995 .

[29]  D. Tilman Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[30]  Richard T. Roush,et al.  Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions , 1993 .

[31]  T. Case,et al.  Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  EFFECTS OF SOIL RESOURCES ON PLANT INVASION AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN CALIFORNIAN SERPENTINE GRASSLAND , 1990 .

[33]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[34]  M. Austin Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[35]  H. Mooney,et al.  Physiological Ecology of North American Plant Communities , 1987, Springer Netherlands.

[36]  W. Post,et al.  Community assembly and food web stability , 1983 .

[37]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[38]  A. Hastings Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space , 1980 .

[39]  Richard Levins,et al.  Coexistence in a Variable Environment , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[40]  DAVID TITMAN,et al.  Ecological Competition Between Algae: Experimental Confirmation of Resource-Based Competition Theory , 1976, Science.

[41]  R. Macarthur Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[42]  R M May,et al.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  R. Macarthur Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[44]  J. Beard Some Vegetation Types of Tropical Australia in Relation to Those of Africa and America , 1967 .

[45]  N. Beadle Soil Phosphate and Its Role in Molding Segments of the Australian Flora and Vegetation, with Special Reference to Xeromorphy and Sclerophylly , 1966 .

[46]  S. Goldhor Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[47]  J. S. Beard,et al.  The Classification of Tropical American Vegetation‐Types , 1955 .