A Field Experiment on Legislators’ Home Styles: Service versus Policy

We conducted a field experiment involving roughly 1,000 letters sent by actual individuals to nearly 500 different legislative offices in order to test whether legislative offices prioritize service over policy in their home style. We find strong evidence that both state and federal legislative offices are more responsive to service requests than they are to policy requests. This pattern is consistent with the desire of legislators to gain leeway with their constituents in order to pursue their own policy goals. We also find that at the federal level Democrats prioritize service over policy more than Republicans and at the state level legislators who won by larger margins are more likely to prioritize service over policy. Finally, our results suggest that the decision to prioritize service occurs in how the office is structured. Among other things this suggests that legislators may be microtargeting less than is often supposed.

[1]  Richard L. Hall,et al.  Participation in Congress , 1996 .

[2]  Kenneth A. Shepsle,et al.  Congressional Staff Turnover and the Ties-That-Bind , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Richard F. Fenno.  Congress at the Grassroots: Representational Change in the South, 1970-1998 , 2000 .

[4]  T. Sulkin.  Issue Politics in Congress , 2005 .

[5]  G. H. Haynes.  Representation in State Legislatures , 1900 .

[6]  L. Richardson,et al.  Explaining Variation in Casework among State Legislators , 1996 .

[7]  W. Bianco.  Trust: Representatives and Constituents , 1994 .

[8]  Bruce E. Cain,et al.  The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence , 1990 .

[9]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[10]  Richard F. Fenno.  Congressmen in committees , 1973 .

[11]  Anthony Moretti.  The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns , 2010 .

[12]  George Serra,et al.  The Electoral Consequences of Perquisite Use: The Casework Case , 1992 .

[13]  Albert D. Cover.  Contacting Congressional Constituents: Some Patterns of Perquisite Use , 1980 .

[14]  Richard F. Fenno.  Home Style : House Members in Their Districts , 1978 .

[15]  K. Shepsle,et al.  U. S. Congressman as Enterprise , 1981 .

[16]  William H. Flanigan,et al.  The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. , 1988 .

[17]  Albert D. Cover,et al.  Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent Opinion , 1982 .

[18]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment , 1977 .

[19]  David R. Mayhew.  Congress: The Electoral Connection , 1975 .

[20]  R. Arnold.  The logic of congressional action , 1990 .

[21]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[22]  E. Adler,et al.  The Home Style Homepage: Legislator Use of the World Wide Web for Constituency Contact , 1998 .

[23]  Mike Yawn,et al.  The Emergence of the Personal Vote , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[24]  H. Eulau,et al.  The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness , 1977 .