Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei

Few neuro-imaging studies of the auditory system have examined the dependence of brain activation on sound bandwidth, a fundamental stimulus parameter, and none have examined bandwidth dependencies in the brainstem. The present study examined the effect of bandwidth on human brainstem activation using fMRI, an indicator of population neural activity. The studied stimuli (broadband, two-, one-, and third-octave continuous noise) activated three brainstem centers: cochlear nucleus, superior olivary complex, and inferior colliculus. Activation could be confidently attributed to these nuclei because it was appropriately punctate (given the small size of the imaged nuclei) and appropriately located (as determined from histological atlases). Activation in all three imaged centers increased monotonically with increasing bandwidth when either stimulus spectrum level or energy was held constant. Supplementary experiments indicated that the measured bandwidth dependencies were not contaminated by the extraneous sounds produced by the scanner. Increases in fMRI activation with increasing bandwidth would be expected from populations of neurons having a single best frequency and only excitatory responses to sound, but not necessarily from lower auditory system neurons with their often more complex responses. Our results provide basic information for designing auditory neuro-imaging studies that need to control for, or manipulate sound bandwidth.

[1]  L. Jäncke,et al.  A parametric analysis of the ‘rate effect’ in the sensorimotor cortex: A fMRI analysis , 1998, NeuroImage.

[2]  M. Harms,et al.  Sound repetition rate in the human auditory pathway: representations in the waveshape and amplitude of fMRI activation. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  A R Palmer,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. Melcher,et al.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Levine,et al.  Artificial stimulation of the auditory system , 1984 .

[7]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  The sound-level-dependent growth in the extent of fMRI activation in Heschl’s gyrus is different for low- and high-frequency tones , 2003, Hearing Research.

[8]  N Fujita,et al.  Effects of stimulus rate on the auditory cortex using fMRI with ‘sparse’ temporal sampling , 2000, Neuroreport.

[9]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Imaging subcortical auditory activity in humans , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[11]  R. Briggs,et al.  Influence of speech stimuli intensity on the activation of auditory cortex investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Regional response differences within the human auditory cortex when listening to words , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Response to noise of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  André Brechmann,et al.  Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: a low-noise fMRI study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  E. Young,et al.  Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of the Human Auditory Cortex Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Sound level representations in the human auditory pathway investigated using fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[19]  A R Palmer,et al.  Time‐course of the auditory BOLD response to scanner noise , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R A Levine,et al.  Lateralized tinnitus studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging: abnormal inferior colliculus activation. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  O. Arthurs,et al.  How well do we understand the neural origins of the fMRI BOLD signal? , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  J. C. Gardner,et al.  Binaural auditory processing in multiple sclerosis subjects , 1993, Hearing Research.

[23]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[24]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Intensity-dependent Activation of the Primary Auditory Cortex in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  Günter Ehret,et al.  Complex sound analysis (frequency resolution, filtering and spectral integration) by single units of the inferior colliculus of the cat , 1988, Brain Research Reviews.

[27]  P A Bandettini,et al.  Effects of stimulus rate on signal response during functional magnetic resonance imaging of auditory cortex. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[29]  D. Hall,et al.  Heschl’s gyrus is more sensitive to tone level than non-primary auditory cortex , 2002, Hearing Research.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[31]  R. Burkard,et al.  The functional anatomy of the normal human auditory system: responses to 0.5 and 4.0 kHz tones at varied intensities. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  N. Kiang,et al.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions , 1999, Human brain mapping.