Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced‐concrete buildings

This paper addresses the issue of horizontal overstrength in modern code-designed reinforced-concrete (RC) buildings. The relationship between the lateral capacity, the design force reduction factor, the ductility level and the overstrength factor are investigated. The lateral capacity and the overstrength factor are estimated by means of inelastic static pushover as well as time-history collapse analysis for 12 buildings of various characteristics representing a wide range of contemporary RC buildings. The importance of employing the elongated periods of structures to obtain the design forces is emphasized. Predicting this period from free vibration analysis by employing ‘effective’ flexural stiffnesses is investigated. A direct relationship between the force reduction factor used in design and the lateral capacity of structures is confirmed in this study. Moreover, conservative overstrength of medium and low period RC buildings designed according to Eurocode 8 is proposed. Finally, the implication of the force reduction factor on the commonly utilized overstrength definition is highlighted. Advantages of using an additional measure of response alongside the overstrength factor are emphasized. This is the ratio between the overstrength factor and the force reduction factor and is termed the inherent overstrength (Ωi). The suggested measure provides more meaningful results of reserve strength and structural response than overstrength and force reduction factors. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Roger Li,et al.  Sensitivity of building response to nonlinear analysis models , 1999 .

[2]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Performance of composite steel/concrete members under earthquake loading. Part I: Analytical model , 1993 .

[3]  A. S. Elnashai,et al.  Confined concrete model under cyclic load , 1997 .

[4]  T. Paulay,et al.  Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings , 1992 .

[5]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Modelling of material non‐linearities in steel structures subjected to transient dynamic loading , 1993 .

[6]  George W. Housner,et al.  Spectrum Intensities of Strong-Motion Earthquakes , 1952 .

[7]  Amr S. Elnashai.  Seismic response of composite framesI. Response criteria input motion , 1996 .

[8]  Aman Mwafy.  Seismic performance of code designed RC buildings , 2001 .

[9]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic resistance of composite beam-columns in multi-storey structures. Part 2: Analytical model and discussion of results , 1994 .

[10]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Observations on the effect of numerical dissipation on the nonlinear dynamic response of structural systems , 1994 .

[11]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  EFFECT OF COLUMN CAPACITY DESIGN ON EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS , 1998 .

[12]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTORS , 1999 .

[13]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Vertical Response of Twelve Structures Recorded during the Northridge Earthquake , 1998 .

[14]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings , 2001 .

[15]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd Factors for Building Seismic Provisions , 1991 .

[16]  Sudhir K. Jain,et al.  Seismic Overstrength in Reinforced Concrete Frames , 1995 .

[17]  A. Elnashai,et al.  ANALYTICAL AND FIELD EVIDENCE OF THE DAMAGING EFFECT OF VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1996 .

[18]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Seismic Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 1994 .

[19]  Patrick Paultre,et al.  Ductility and overstrength in seismic design of reinforced concrete structures , 1994 .