Acquiescent Response Bias as an Aspect of Cultural Communication Style

Estimates of acquiescent response bias derived from previously published, large-scale cross-cultural surveys that used Likert-type response scales are compared. Substantial evidence for convergent validity is found, particularly in relation to the surveys that measured value preferences. High bias in responses to personally relevant items is found in nations that are high on family collectivism and on a preference for increased uncertainty avoidance. High bias in responses to descriptions of others is found in nations low in uncertainty avoidance. These findings suggest that national indicators of acquiescence have substantive cultural meaning and should not be eliminated from nation-level analyses but rather built into analyses of cultural dynamics.

[1]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[2]  R. Wiseman,et al.  Intercultural communication theory , 1995 .

[3]  David Watkins,et al.  Culture, Gender, and Response Bias , 1995 .

[4]  G. Marín,et al.  Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence among Hispanics , 1992 .

[5]  P. Howlin.  The Assessment of Social Behavior , 1978 .

[6]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling , 2000 .

[7]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style , 1989 .

[8]  J. Berry,et al.  Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research , 1986 .

[9]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[10]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality trait structure as a human universal. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[11]  E. Diener,et al.  Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  楊國樞,et al.  Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-Free Dimensions of Culture , 1987 .

[13]  William D. Gudykunst.  Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. , 1995 .

[14]  Zeynep Aycan,et al.  Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A 10-Country Comparison Влияние культуры на практику HR-менеджмента: сравнение 10 стран , 2000 .

[15]  Fons Trompenaars,et al.  National Culture and the Values of Organizational Employees , 1996 .

[16]  Carlos Muñoz,et al.  The Search for Universal Dimensions of General Beliefs About How the World Functions , 2002 .

[17]  S. Schwartz.  Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. , 1994 .

[18]  J. Osland,et al.  Advances in Global Leadership , 2006, Advances in Global Leadership.

[19]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Conflict Management Style: Accounting for Cross-National Differences , 1998 .

[20]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. , 1996 .

[21]  Celeste P.M. Wilderom,et al.  Cultural influences on leadership and organizations : Project GLOBE , 1999 .

[22]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values , 2002 .

[23]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Structural and functional equivalence of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire within and between countries , 2002 .

[24]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  On the Empirical Identification of Dimensions for Cross-Cultural Comparisons , 1989 .

[25]  H. Markus,et al.  Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  R. Bhagat.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[27]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Cultural Values, Sources of Guidance, and their Relevance to Managerial Behavior , 2002 .