Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding

Interpretation of symbols, as well as understanding the particulate nature of matter and spatial structures, are essential skills students need for solving problems in chemistry. However, model perception and understanding the spatial structure of organic molecules has been a source of difficulty for many chemistry students. The research objective was to investigate the effect of using virtual and physical models while teaching organic chemistry on student understanding of new concepts, the spatial structure of new molecules, and preference of a particular model type. The research involved a new teaching method that combines two types of three -dimensional molecular models: physical (plastic) and virtual (computerized). The research population included 276 students from nine high schools in Haifa and the northern part of Israel. Experimental students gained a better understanding of the model concept and were more capable of defining and implementing new concepts, such as isomerism and functional group. They were better capable of mentally traversing across four understanding levels in chemistry: symbol, macroscopic, microscopic and process. Experimental group students were more capable of applying transformation from two-dimensional representations of molecules, provided by either a symbolic or a structural formula, to three-dimensional representations – a drawing of a model, and vice versa. Based on the research findings, we recommend incorporating both virtual and physical models in chemistry teaching/learning as a means to foster model perception and spatial understanding of molecular structure.

[1]  Robert Kozma.  Students collaborating with computer models and physical experiments , 1999, CSCL.

[2]  S. Gilbert.  Model building and a definition of science , 1991 .

[3]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics , 1996 .

[4]  A. P. Ryles.  Teaching A-Level Organic Chemistry Mechanisms: Some Suggestions. , 1990 .

[5]  Elizabeth Wilson.  THINKING INSTEAD OF 'COOKBOOKING': When computers take over the dirty work in college chemistry labs, students can focus on the bigger picture , 1997 .

[6]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[7]  Pat Forster,et al.  Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice , 2002 .

[8]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  High-School Chemistry Students' Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment , 1999 .

[9]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Research Strategy for the Dynamic Study of Students' Concepts and Problem Solving Strategies Using Science Software. , 1988 .

[10]  A. Johnstone.  Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[11]  John Eliot,et al.  Different Dimensions of Spatial Ability , 1981 .

[12]  Hans-Jürgen Schmidt.  Conceptual Difficulties with Isomerism. , 1992 .

[13]  Quentin R. Petersen,et al.  Some Reflections on the Use and Abuse of Molecular Models. , 1970 .

[14]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  The Effect of Student Manipulation of Molecular Models on Chemistry achievement According to Piagetian Level. , 1980 .

[15]  Anthony J. Hardwicke.  Using Molecular Models to Teach Chemistry. Part I: Modelling Molecules. , 1995 .

[16]  Arnon Shani,et al.  A Self-Study, One-Paced Basic Organic Chemistry Course. , 1982 .

[17]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Learning Science Through Models and Modelling , 1998 .

[18]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Computerized molecular modeling as a collaborative learning environment , 1999, CSCL.

[19]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  COMPUTERIZED MOLECULAR MODELING - THE NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCING MODEL PERCEPTION AMONG CHEMISTRY EDUCATORS AND LEARNERS , 2000 .

[20]  D. Gabel,et al.  The Complexity of Chemistry and Implications for Teaching , 1998 .

[21]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[22]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Model–based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum , 1995 .

[23]  Yehudit Judy Dori.  Cooperative studyware development of organic chemistry module by experts, teachers, and students , 1995 .

[24]  S. R. Baker,et al.  Visualization skills as a component of aptitude for chemistry-A construct validatiqn study , 1974 .

[25]  David F. Salisbury,et al.  Development and Validation of Models in Instructional Design. , 1994 .

[26]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  The ‘Mole Environment’ studyware: applying multidimensional analysis to quantitative chemistry problems , 1998 .

[27]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  In-Service Chemistry Teachers Training : The Impact of Introducing Computer Technology on Teachers ' Attitudes . 0 , 2012 .