Convolution Neural Network Algorithm for Shockable Arrhythmia Classification Within a Digitally Connected Automated External Defibrillator

Background Diagnosis of shockable rhythms leading to defibrillation remains integral to improving out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. New machine learning techniques have emerged to diagnose arrhythmias on ECGs. In out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, an algorithm within an automated external defibrillator is the major determinant to deliver defibrillation. This study developed and validated the performance of a convolution neural network (CNN) to diagnose shockable arrhythmias within a novel, miniaturized automated external defibrillator. Methods and Results There were 26 464 single‐lead ECGs that comprised the study data set. ECGs of 7‐s duration were retrospectively adjudicated by 3 physician readers (N=18 total readers). After exclusions (N=1582), ECGs were divided into training (N=23 156), validation (N=721), and test data sets (N=1005). CNN performance to diagnose shockable and nonshockable rhythms was reported with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, F1, and sensitivity and specificity calculations. The duration for the CNN to output was reported with the algorithm running within the automated external defibrillator. Internal and external validation analyses included CNN performance among arrhythmias, often mistaken for shockable rhythms, and performance among ECGs modified with noise to mimic artifacts. The CNN algorithm achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.995 (95% CI, 0.990–1.0), sensitivity of 98%, and specificity of 100% to diagnose shockable rhythms. The F1 scores were 0.990 and 0.995 for shockable and nonshockable rhythms, respectively. After input of a 7‐s ECG, the CNN generated an output in 383±29 ms (total time of 7.383 s). The CNN outperformed adjudicators in classifying atrial arrhythmias as nonshockable (specificity of 99.3%–98.1%) and was robust against noise artifacts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range, 0.871–0.999). Conclusions We demonstrate high diagnostic performance of a CNN algorithm for shockable and nonshockable rhythm arrhythmia classifications within a digitally connected automated external defibrillator. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03662802; Unique identifier: NCT03662802

[1]  M. Yazdchi,et al.  LDIAED: A lightweight deep learning algorithm implementable on automated external defibrillators , 2022, PloS one.

[2]  A. Philippakis,et al.  ECG-Based Deep Learning and Clinical Risk Factors to Predict Atrial Fibrillation , 2021, Circulation.

[3]  Joseph E. Gonzalez,et al.  Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network and Explainability Technique for 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Interpretation. , 2021, JAMA cardiology.

[4]  Irena Jekova,et al.  Optimization of End-to-End Convolutional Neural Networks for Analysis of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Rhythms during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , 2021, Sensors.

[5]  A. Philippakis,et al.  Deep Learning to Predict Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Derived Left Ventricular Mass and Hypertrophy From 12-Lead ECGs , 2021, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  P. Noseworthy,et al.  Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography in cardiovascular disease management , 2021, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[7]  R. Merchant,et al.  Part 1: Executive Summary: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2020, Circulation.

[8]  M. Peberdy,et al.  Part 7: Systems of Care: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2020, Circulation.

[9]  Yola Jones,et al.  Improving ECG Classification Interpretability using Saliency Maps , 2020, 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE).

[10]  C. Torp‐Pedersen,et al.  Smartphone Activation of Citizen Responders to Facilitate Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  P. Doevendans,et al.  Automatic Triage of 12‐Lead ECGs Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks , 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[12]  Irena Jekova,et al.  Fully Convolutional Deep Neural Networks with Optimized Hyperparameters for Detection of Shockable and Non-Shockable Rhythms , 2020, Sensors.

[13]  S. Bhavnani,et al.  INNOVATIONS IN RESUSCITATION SCIENCE: ASSESSMENT OF DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY OF A NEXT-GENERATION MINIATURIZED AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR , 2020 .

[14]  Michael J Ackerman,et al.  Detection of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using a Convolutional Neural Network-Enabled Electrocardiogram. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Cyrus E. Kuschner,et al.  Recent advances in personalizing cardiac arrest resuscitation , 2019, F1000Research.

[16]  Felipe Alonso-Atienza,et al.  Mixed convolutional and long short-term memory network for the detection of lethal ventricular arrhythmia , 2019, PloS one.

[17]  P. Noseworthy,et al.  Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[18]  A. Ng,et al.  Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Kiseon Kim,et al.  Deep Feature Learning for Sudden Cardiac Arrest Detection in Automated External Defibrillators , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  2017 Roadmap for Innovation-ACC Health Policy Statement on Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Health, Big Data, and Precision Health: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Health Policy Statements and Systems of Care. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Monique L. Anderson,et al.  Association of Public Health Initiatives With Outcomes for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Home and in Public Locations , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[22]  R. Koster,et al.  Automated external defibrillator and operator performance in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2017, Resuscitation.

[23]  S. Perman,et al.  Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Current Review of the Literature that Informed the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update , 2016, Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports.

[24]  Felipe Alonso-Atienza,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques for the Detection of Shockable Rhythms in Automated External Defibrillators , 2016, PloS one.

[25]  Keiichi Fukuda,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Commercially Available Automated External Defibrillators , 2015, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[26]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Deep Neural Networks with Random Gaussian Weights: A Universal Classification Strategy? , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[27]  B. McNally,et al.  A composite model of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). , 2013, Resuscitation.

[28]  B. McNally,et al.  Association of Neighborhood Characteristics With Bystander-Initiated CPR , 2013 .

[29]  R. Berg,et al.  Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[30]  Arthur L. Kellermann,et al.  Predictors of Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[31]  Arthur L Kellermann,et al.  CARES: Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[32]  J P Ornato,et al.  Public-access Defibrillation and Survival after Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Recommended Citation Public-access Defibrillation and Survival after Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2022 .

[33]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[34]  Richard E. Kerber,et al.  Automatic External Defibrillators for Public Access Defibrillation: Recommendations for Specifying and Reporting Arrhythmia Analysis Algorithm Performance, Incorporating New Waveforms, and Enhancing Safety , 1997, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[35]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[36]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[37]  Andrew L. Maas Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models , 2013 .