Modifications and innovations to research solutions in the lab : a study on the post-adoptive usage behaviors of life scientists

Abstract Research solutions in life science are bundles of documented knowledge (i.e., a manual) and materials provided by commercial firms to help scientists with their experiments. This study builds on existing research on post-adoptive usage to understand why some scientists are more likely to make modifications—personalization, customization, invention changes (including making add-ins and using existing functions for novel purposes)—to a research solution after their adoptions. By examining the different modification behaviors of 1908 scientists over a sixteen-year period, the authors find that the likelihood of users in making modifications are positively impacted by their diverse range of usage experience, early usage status, and collaborative support from the scientific community. While expertise can have a positive impact on the personalization and customization modifications, it has an inverted U-shaped relationship with invention changes. Interestingly, the effects from the characteristics of a research solution are mixed. For example, ease of use can negatively impact on a user′s likelihood to make personalization and customization modifications or create add-ins, but it is positively linked to the likelihood in applying existing functions for novel purposes.

[1]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[2]  Amalya L. Oliver.  Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations , 2004 .

[3]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[5]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  The Service-dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions , 2006 .

[6]  E. Hippel,et al.  Customers As Innovators: A New Way to Create Value , 2002 .

[7]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  The Psychology of Problem Solving: Motivating Self-Regulated Problem Solvers , 2003 .

[8]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  The Diffusion and Assimilation of Information Technology Innovations , 2001 .

[9]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[10]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .

[11]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[12]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. , 1999 .

[13]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Mining External R&D , 2011 .

[14]  E. Hippel,et al.  THE DOMINANT ROLE OF "LOCAL" INFORMATION IN USER INNOVATION: THE CASE OF MOUNTAIN BIKING , 2003 .

[15]  R. S. Schmidt.  NASA pressure-relieving foam technology is keeping the leading innerspring mattress firms awake at night , 2009 .

[16]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[17]  Wim G. Biemans,et al.  User and third-party involvement in developing medical equipment innovations☆ , 1991 .

[18]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  The Psychology of Expertise: Cognitive Research and Empirical AI , 2011 .

[20]  D. Ortinau,et al.  Exploring consumers' postadoption attitudes and use behaviors in monitoring the diffusion of a technology-based discontinuous innovation , 1988 .

[21]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[22]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Flow Signals: How Patterns over Time Affect the Acceptance of Start-Up Firms , 2008 .

[23]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation , 2003 .

[24]  Roberto Mazzoleni,et al.  Learning and path-dependence in the diffusion of innovations: comparative evidence on numerically controlled machine tools , 1997 .

[25]  Shantanu Dutta,et al.  Customizing Complex Products: When Should the Vendor Take Control? , 2006 .

[26]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Beyond Adoption: Development and Application of a Use-Diffusion Model , 2004 .

[27]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[28]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[29]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Industrial Research and Technological Innovation: An Econometric Analysis , 1968 .

[30]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience , 1989 .

[31]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  On being an expert: a cost-benefit analysis , 1992 .

[32]  P. N. Golder.  Historical Method in Marketing Research with New Evidence on Long-Term Market Share Stability , 2000 .

[33]  Philip Hans Franses,et al.  The impact of adoption timing on new service usage and early disadoption , 2009 .

[34]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[35]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[36]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[37]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[38]  Janet E. Davidson,et al.  The psychology of problem solving , 2003 .

[39]  Pieter Verdegem,et al.  Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: Towards an integrated and comprehensive overview , 2011 .

[40]  G. Pisano.  Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[41]  R. Rothwell,et al.  Invention, innovation, re-innovation and the role of the user: A case study of British hovercraft development , 1985 .

[42]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[43]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[44]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[45]  R. Sternberg.  Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[46]  G. Tellis,et al.  Does Quality Win? Network Effects versus Quality in High-Tech Markets , 2009 .

[47]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers , 2004 .

[48]  K. Holyoak.  Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. , 1991 .

[49]  R. Sternberg.  Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[50]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[52]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[54]  Sudha Ram,et al.  “Forced” adoption of innovations in organizations: Consequences and implications , 1991 .

[55]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  First to Market, First to Fail? Real Causes of Enduring Market Leadership , 2006 .

[56]  H. H. Kassarjian.  Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[57]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation , 2005 .

[58]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Going beyond the product: Defining, designing, and delivering customer solutions , 2006 .

[59]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Expertise: acquisition, limitations, and control , 2009 .

[60]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[61]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[62]  S. Dumais,et al.  Handbook of applied cognition , 2007 .

[63]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field , 2004 .

[64]  Carol Saunders,et al.  EDITOR’S COMMENTS Volume 29 Iss. 4 , 2005 .

[65]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[66]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Special Issue on Information Technology and Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[67]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[68]  R. Kolbe,et al.  Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity , 1991 .

[69]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Modifications and innovations to technology artifacts , 2007 .

[70]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Extending Lead User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Lead Userness , 2007 .

[71]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  Martin T. Wells,et al.  USING RANDOM RATHER THAN FIXED EFFECTS MODELS IN META‐ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY AND VALIDITY GENERALIZATION , 1996 .

[73]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[74]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[75]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  The role of users in the development of applications software , 1985 .

[76]  G. Tellis,et al.  Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend? , 1993 .

[77]  E. Hippel.  The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process , 1993 .

[78]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of Innovating Users in a Consumer Goods Field: An Empirical Study of Sport-Related Product Consumers , 2002 .

[79]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  From Density to Destiny: Using Spatial Dimension of Sales Data for Early Prediction of New Product Success , 2004 .

[80]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[81]  B. Shaw.  The Role of the Interaction between the User and the Manufacturer in Medical Equipment Innovation , 1985 .

[82]  K. Desouza,et al.  Factors governing the consumption of explicit knowledge , 2006 .

[83]  Brigitte Borja de Mozota,et al.  The Impact of User‐Oriented Design on New Product Development: An Examination of Fundamental Relationships* , 2005 .

[84]  Johann Füller,et al.  Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation , 2009 .

[85]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[86]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[87]  Robert Meeds,et al.  Cognitive and attitudinal effects of technical advertising copy: the roles of gender, self-assessed and objective consumer knowledge , 2004 .

[88]  Guido Reger,et al.  Networking beyond the software code? an explorative examination of the development of an open source car project , 2010 .

[89]  James D. Hess,et al.  That's What I Thought I Wanted? Miswanting and Regret for a Standard Good in a Mass-Customized World , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[90]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[91]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[92]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[93]  B. Adelson.  When Novices Surpass Experts: The Difficulty of a Task May Increase With Expertise , 1984 .

[94]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[95]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[96]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  special issue: The economic contribution of information technology: Towards comparative and user studies , 2001 .

[97]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Knowledge and Expertise , 2008 .

[98]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution , 1999 .

[99]  B. Stein.  Memory and Creativity , 1989 .

[100]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges , 2001, MIS Q..

[101]  G. Tellis,et al.  Beyond Diffusion: An Affordability Model of the Growth of New Consumer Durables , 1998 .