Task set induces dynamic reallocation of resources in visual short-term memory

Successful interaction with the environment requires the ability to flexibly allocate resources to different locations in the visual field. Recent evidence suggests that visual short-term memory (VSTM) resources are distributed asymmetrically across the visual field based upon task demands. Here, we propose that context, rather than the stimulus itself, determines asymmetrical distribution of VSTM resources. To test whether context modulates the reallocation of resources to the right visual field, task set, defined by memory-load, was manipulated to influence visual short-term memory performance. Performance was measured for single-feature objects embedded within predominantly single- or two-feature memory blocks. Therefore, context was varied to determine whether task set directly predicts changes in visual field biases. In accord with the dynamic reallocation of resources hypothesis, task set, rather than aspects of the physical stimulus, drove improvements in performance in the right- visual field. Our results show, for the first time, that preparation for upcoming memory demands directly determines how resources are allocated across the visual field.

[1]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[2]  K. Heilman,et al.  Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Kinsbourne Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[5]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Visual Search Performance in the Neglect Syndrome , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  S. E. Black,et al.  Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[9]  M. Mesulam Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[14]  E. Vogel,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004 .

[15]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[16]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Right parietal cortex plays a critical role in change blindness. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[18]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[19]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[20]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture , 2008 .

[21]  Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using Psychopy , 2022 .

[22]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[23]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[24]  N. Cowan,et al.  The Magical Mystery Four , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.

[25]  S. Kastner,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Control in Frontal and Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  What are the units of storage in visual working memory? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[27]  D. Somers,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry in Visuotopic Posterior Parietal Cortex Emerges with Visual Short-Term Memory Load , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Flicker, motion artifacts, and depth distortions in stereo 3D displays , 2012 .

[30]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  The Relationship between Working Memory Storage and Elevated Activity as Measured with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Morgan D Barense,et al.  To bind or not to bind: addressing the question of object representation in visual short-term memory. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[32]  D. Somers,et al.  An Emergent Hemifield Asymmetry for Visual Short-Term Memory Capacity , 2012 .

[33]  Marius V Peelen,et al.  Eye gaze adaptation under interocular suppression. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[34]  W. Poynter,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in visual search , 2012, Laterality.

[35]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  Distributed Patterns of Activity in Sensory Cortex Reflect the Precision of Multiple Items Maintained in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  S. Shomstein,et al.  Hemifield asymmetries differentiate VSTM for single- and multiple-feature objects , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Parietal and Frontal Cortex Encode Stimulus-Specific Mnemonic Representations during Visual Working Memory , 2015, Neuron.

[38]  Michael A. Silver,et al.  Hemisphere-Dependent Attentional Modulation of Human Parietal Visual Field Representations , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Decoding the content of visual short-term memory under distraction in occipital and parietal areas , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.