Personal carbon trading: A critical survey

In recent years, there has been considerable discussion within UK climate policy circles regarding the appropriateness of personal carbon trading as an instrument for greenhouse gas emission reduction. This paper is the first in a two-part survey of personal carbon trading (PCT), the term used here to describe proposed (sub-)national greenhouse gas emission trading schemes under which at least some emissions rights are allocated to and surrendered by individuals. After introducing the various proposed PCT schemes, the paper compares, in terms of equity, the two most-discussed PCT schemes with two alternative emission trading schemes and a carbon tax. The papers' two key findings are as follows. First, there are strong arguments that the equal per capita allocation proposed under some instruments is not completely fair. Second, the five instruments compared can be equivalent in terms of their equity. Along with equity, efficiency and effectiveness make up three key criteria for comparing environmental policy instruments. As PCT has no advantage in terms of equity, the paper concludes that any case for PCT will depend on it having advantages in terms of efficiency and/or effectiveness. Whether PCT has such advantages is explored in Part 2.

[1]  Richard Starkey,et al.  Assessing common(s) arguments for an equal per capita allocation , 2011 .

[2]  Charles Raux,et al.  The potential for CO2 emissions trading in transport: the case of personal vehicles and freight , 2010 .

[3]  Peter Grabosky,et al.  Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy , 1999 .

[4]  David Fleming,et al.  Tradable quotas: using information technology to cap national carbon emissions , 1997 .

[5]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  KEY ELEMENTS OF A GLOBAL DEAL ON CLIMATE CHANGE , 2008 .

[6]  M. M’Gonigle,et al.  Does ecological economics have a future , 2012 .

[7]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Rethinking Downstream Regulation: California's Opportunity to Engage Households in Reducing Greenhouse Gases , 2008 .

[8]  An Essay on Rights. , 1996 .

[9]  M. Otsuka Libertarianism Without Inequality , 2003 .

[10]  Peter J. Barnes Climate Solutions: A Citizen's Guide , 2008 .

[11]  UK Households' Carbon Footprint: A Comparison of the Association between Household Characteristics and Emissions from Home Energy, Transport and Other Goods and Services , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  R. Dworkin Ronald Dworkin Replies , 2007 .

[13]  L. Cárdenas,et al.  UK greenhouse gas inventory 1990 to 2006: annual report for submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2006 .

[14]  Zia Wadud,et al.  Personal Tradable Carbon Permits for Road Transport: Why, Why Not, and Who Wins? , 2011 .

[15]  Mayer Hillman,et al.  How We Can Save the Planet , 2004 .

[16]  G. Cohen,et al.  On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice , 1989, Ethics.

[17]  Milena Büchs,et al.  Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households' home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions , 2013 .

[18]  I. Roberts Stopping the traffic , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  R. Nozick Anarchy, State, and Utopia , 1975, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[20]  Peter J. Barnes,et al.  Who Owns the Sky?: Our Common Assets And The Future Of Capitalism , 2001 .

[21]  R. Ayres Environmental market failures: Are there any local market-based corrective mechanisms for global problems? , 1997 .

[22]  D. Schmidtz The Institution of Property , 1994, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[23]  Cameron Hepburn,et al.  REGULATION BY PRICES, QUANTITIES, OR BOTH: A REVIEW OF INSTRUMENT , 2006 .

[24]  G. Dye Dworkin and His Critics. With Replies by Dworkin, edited by Justine Burley, Oxford, Blackwell, 2004 , 2006 .

[25]  R. Dworkin Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality , 2000 .

[26]  Tina Fawcett,et al.  Personal carbon trading: A policy ahead of its time? , 2010 .

[27]  Robert Ayres,et al.  Turning point : an end to the growth paradigm , 1998 .

[28]  M. Weitzman Prices vs. Quantities , 1974 .