A Method to Manipulate Subjective Time by using Tactile Stimuli of Wearable Device

There are situations where it would be desirable to manipulate the subjective time, and many studies have proposed methods to manipulate the subjective time for purposes such as reducing waiting time. However, it isn’t easy to use previous methods in various situations because most of them use visual and auditory information. This study proposes a method to manipulate the subjective time by tactile stimuli of wrist-worn devices. Since wrist-worn devices such as smartwatches are widely used and can present tactile stimuli at any time, our method can be used without blocking visual or auditory perception channels. We designed tactile stimuli presentation methods that change the number of stimuli. The evaluation result clarified the elements of tactile stimuli that intentionally changed the subjective time and confirmed that our method could change the subjective time by about 21% (from -3% to 18%). Since few studies focused on the phenomenon that the subjective time changes depending on tactile stimuli of information devices, our study can contribute to designing information devices and user experiences.

[1]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  Waiting times in quality of experience for web based services , 2012, 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[2]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are Web users willing to wait? , 2004, AMCIS.

[3]  Brad A. Myers,et al.  The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces , 1985, CHI '85.

[4]  Bruce D. Weinberg,et al.  Don't keep your Internet customers waiting too long at the (virtual) front door , 2000 .

[5]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory human-computer interfaces , 1993, INTERCHI.

[6]  Kaori Yoshida,et al.  How does Shape of Progress Bar Effect on Time Evaluation , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[7]  John H Wearden,et al.  Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Ramesh K. Sitaraman,et al.  Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior: Inferring Causality Using Quasi-Experimental Designs , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[9]  Stéphane Conversy,et al.  Auditory illusions for audio feedback , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[10]  Matt Miller,et al.  Quality is in the eye of the beholder. , 2004, Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology.

[11]  Robert Bell,et al.  Rethinking the progress bar , 2007, UIST.

[12]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Need for non-visual feedback with long response times in mobile HCI , 2005, WWW '05.

[13]  B. Kahn,et al.  How Tolerable is Delay? Consumers’ Evaluations of Internet Web Sites after Waiting , 1998 .

[14]  E. Bigand,et al.  Music, emotion, and time perception: the influence of subjective emotional valence and arousal? , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[15]  Monica Gori,et al.  Perceived duration of Visual and Tactile Stimuli Depends on Perceived Speed , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[16]  Murray Crease,et al.  Making progress with sounds - the design & evaluation of an audio progress bar , 1998 .

[17]  Pratibha A. Dabholkar,et al.  Perceived Download Waiting in Using Web Sites: A Conceptual Framework with Mediating and Moderating Effects , 2008 .

[18]  Tsutomu Terada,et al.  In-clock manipulator: information-presentation method for manipulating subjective time using wearable devices , 2017, MUM.

[19]  Mario Köppen,et al.  Color Effect on Subjective Perception of Progress Bar Speed , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[20]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Mapping information to audio and tactile icons , 2009, ICMI-MLMI '09.

[21]  Sylvie Droit-Volet,et al.  A further investigation of the filled-duration illusion with a comparison between children and adults. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  Nina Koiso-Kanttila,et al.  Time, attention, authenticity and consumer benefits of the Web , 2005 .

[23]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  BRIEF REPORT Perception of the duration of emotional events , 2004 .

[24]  Allan Kuchinsky,et al.  Quality is in the eye of the beholder: meeting users' requirements for Internet quality of service , 2000, CHI.

[25]  Jess Hohenstein,et al.  Shorter Wait Times: The Effects of Various Loading Screens on Perceived Performance , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Tanzeem Choudhury,et al.  BoostMeUp: Improving Cognitive Performance in the Moment by Unobtrusively Regulating Emotions with a Smartwatch , 2019, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[27]  Seiji Yamada,et al.  Exploring Auditory Information to Change Users' Perception of Time Passing as Shorter , 2020, CHI.

[28]  Zhiquan Yeo,et al.  Faster progress bars: manipulating perceived duration with visual augmentations , 2010, CHI.

[29]  Louis Buffardi,et al.  Factors affecting the filled-duration illusion in the auditory, tactual, and visual modalities , 1971 .

[30]  The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces , 1985, CHI.

[31]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[32]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Time perception and the filled-duration illusion , 1974 .

[33]  Tadayuki Tayama,et al.  Estimated Duration for Rotating-spot-pattern , 1987 .