Nuclear translocation kinetics of NF-κB in macrophages challenged with pathogens in a microfluidic platform

We have developed a microfluidic platform for real-time imaging of host–pathogen interactions and cellular signaling events. Host cells are immobilized in a controlled environment for optical interrogation of the kinetics and stochasticity of immune response to pathogenic challenges. Here, we have quantitatively measured activation of the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) pathway in RAW264.7 murine macrophage-like cells. This was achieved by measuring the cytoplasm-to-nucleus translocation kinetics of a green fluorescent protein fusion construct to the NF-κB transcription factor subunit RelA (GFP-RelA). Translocation kinetics in response to live bacteria and purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenges were measured, and this work presents the first demonstration of live imaging of host cell infection on a microfluidic platform with quantitative analysis of an early (<0.5 h from infection) immune signaling event. Our data show that a 1,000× increase in the LPS dose led to a ~10× increase in a host cell activation metric we developed in order to describe NF-κB translocation kinetics. Using this metric, live bacteria challenges were assigned an equivalent LPS dose as a first step towards comparing NF-κB translocation kinetics between TLR4-only pathway signaling (activated by LPS) and multiple pathway signaling (activated by whole bacteria). The device also contains a unique architecture for capturing and fluidically isolating single host cells for the purpose of differentiating between primary and secondary immune signaling.

[1]  B. Butcher,et al.  Mechanism of Entry Determines the Ability of Toxoplasma gondii To Inhibit Macrophage Proinflammatory Cytokine Production , 2002, Infection and Immunity.

[2]  A. B. Frazier,et al.  Ion channel characterization using single cell impedance spectroscopy. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Pascale Jeannin,et al.  Measurement of nuclear factor-kappa B translocation on lipopolysaccharide-activated human dendritic cells by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. , 2002, Cytometry.

[4]  S. Akira,et al.  Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[5]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[6]  Aaron R Wheeler,et al.  Microfluidic device for single-cell analysis. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  R. Dziarski.  Deadly plague versus mild-mannered TLR4 , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[8]  Robert T Kennedy,et al.  Perfusion and chemical monitoring of living cells on a microfluidic chip. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Deirdre R. Meldrum,et al.  Life-on-a-chip , 2003, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[10]  Pradipsinh K Rathod,et al.  Microfluidic Modeling of Cell−Cell Interactions in Malaria Pathogenesis , 2007, PLoS pathogens.

[11]  P. Carroad,et al.  Estimation of diffusion coefficients of proteins , 1980 .

[12]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Single-cell enzyme concentrations, kinetics, and inhibition analysis using high-density hydrodynamic cell isolation arrays. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Christian Amatore,et al.  Electrochemical detection in a microfluidic device of oxidative stress generated by macrophage cells. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[14]  S. S. Mani,et al.  Impedimetric and optical interrogation of single cells in a microfluidic device for real-time viability and chemical response assessment. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[15]  Cheng-Wey Wei,et al.  Elucidating in vitro cell-cell interaction using a microfluidic coculture system , 2006, Biomedical microdevices.

[16]  Albert Folch,et al.  Differentiation-on-a-chip: a microfluidic platform for long-term cell culture studies. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[17]  K. O. Mercurius,et al.  Stimulation of transcription factors NF kappa B and AP1 in endothelial cells subjected to shear stress. , 1994, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[18]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Stochastic regulation in early immune response. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Timothy B. Stockwell,et al.  Nanoliter Reactors Improve Multiple Displacement Amplification of Genomes from Single Cells , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[20]  B. Paterson,et al.  The beta actin promoter. High levels of transcription depend upon a CCAAT binding factor. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Jayaraman,et al.  Dynamic gene expression profiling using a microfabricated living cell array. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  O. Uğur,et al.  Allosteric equilibrium model explains steady-state coupling of beta-adrenergic receptors to adenylate cyclase in turkey erythrocyte membranes. , 1997, The Biochemical journal.

[24]  Arul Jayaraman,et al.  Optimization of Reporter Cells for Expression Profiling in a Microfluidic Device , 2005, Biomedical microdevices.

[25]  Bo Huang,et al.  Counting Low-Copy Number Proteins in a Single Cell , 2007, Science.

[26]  J. Hasty,et al.  Dynamics of single-cell gene expression , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[27]  N. Vij,et al.  A Novel Role of the Lumican Core Protein in Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide-induced Innate Immune Response* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  K. Moore,et al.  Divergent Response to LPS and Bacteria in CD14-Deficient Murine Macrophages1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[29]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Dynamic single-cell analysis for quantitative biology. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.