Objective compliance of adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis in a dynamic SpineCor brace

PurposeDynamic SpineCor was designed to overcome the disadvantages of rigid orthoses—bulkiness, physical constraint and warming—and to improve the acceptance and compliance as limiting factors of brace treatment. Those theoretical benefits have not been proved by compliance studies yet.MethodsSpineCor braces of 12 adolescent scoliotic girls were equipped with flexible temperature loggers, which were sandwiched between gel foam and the brace’s pelvic base. Patients and parents were blinded for the observation period of 14 days and gave post-hoc consent. The logger yielded 672 time-stamped values at 30-min intervals. Pilot testing revealed values beyond the 30°C threshold as indicative for brace wear.ResultsThe average overall compliance (% wearing hours/prescribed 23 h) was 54% ± 22.3 (range, 11.8–95.8%). The youngest patients (aged 10–12 years) were significantly more compliant than the others (P < 0.05). Most patients had a scattered wearing pattern: one was a day-wearer, one a night-wearer and only the two high adherers showed a consistent daily pattern. There was no significant difference between weekdays, weekdays and weekends, nor between day and night wear.ConclusionThe current study showed that the compliance of patients in a dynamic SpineCor is as limited as in a conventional brace. This is in line with earlier data on patients’ SpineCor and rigid brace acceptance evaluated by a questionnaire and on temperature logging in rigid braces.

[1]  M W Ferguson-Pell,et al.  Quantitative measurement of spinal brace use and compliance in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[2]  Weiss Hr SpineCor vs. natural history - explanation of the results obtained using a simple biomechanical model. , 2008 .

[3]  B. S. Richards,et al.  Standardization of Criteria for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Brace Studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management , 2005, Spine.

[4]  B. Ng,et al.  The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the gait pattern of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[5]  Jack C Y Cheng,et al.  The Effect of Rigid Versus Flexible Spinal Orthosis on the Clinical Efficacy and Acceptance of the Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2008, Spine.

[6]  S. Nozoe,et al.  Psychologic Management of Brace Therapy for Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2005, Spine.

[7]  R. Betz,et al.  The Validity of Compliance Monitors to Assess Wearing Time of Thoracic-Lumbar-Sacral Orthoses in Children With Spinal Cord Injury , 2008, Spine.

[8]  Michael Lankes,et al.  The Objective Determination of Compliance in Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With Spinal Orthoses , 2006, Spine.

[9]  M W Ferguson-Pell,et al.  The Objective Measurement of Spinal Orthosis Use for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2003, Spine.

[10]  D. Polly,et al.  A Review of Quality of Life and Psychosocial Issues in Scoliosis , 2006, Spine.

[11]  K. Zabjek,et al.  SpineCor – a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: post-treatment results , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[12]  Marie Beauséjour,et al.  Effectiveness of the Spinecor brace based on the new standardized criteria proposed by the Scoliosis Research Society for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2007, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[13]  J. M. Carlson,et al.  The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  T. Rahman,et al.  Compliance Monitoring of Brace Treatment for Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2004, Spine.

[15]  N. Green,et al.  Brace-wear compliance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1988, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[16]  John G. Birch,et al.  Accuracy in the Prediction and Estimation of Adherence to Bracewear Before and During Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2008, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[17]  K. Zabjek,et al.  Relationship between gibbosity and Cobb angle during treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the SpineCor brace , 2000, European spine journal.

[18]  E. Lou,et al.  Brace monitoring system for the treatment of scoliosis. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[19]  P. Korovessis,et al.  Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[20]  T. Rahman,et al.  The Association Between Brace Compliance and Outcome for Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[21]  M Lindeman,et al.  Cognitive strategies and self-esteem as predictors of brace-wear noncompliance in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and kyphosis. , 1999, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[22]  N. Green,et al.  Stress and Coping with Scoliosis: Psychological Effects on Adolescents and Their Families , 1989, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[23]  C. Rivard,et al.  Treatment of early adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the SpineCor System. , 2008, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[24]  D L Hill,et al.  Correlation between quantity and quality of orthosis wear and treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.