Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design

How can firms profitably give away free products? This paper provides a novel answer and articulates trade-offs in a space of information product design. We introduce a formal model of two-sided network externalities based in textbook economics-a mix of Katz and Shapiro network effects, price discrimination, and product differentiation. Externality-based complements, however, exploit a different mechanism than either tying or lock-in even as they help to explain many recent strategies such as those of firms selling operating systems, Internet browsers, games, music, and video. The model presented here argues for three simple but useful results. First, even in the absence of competition, a firm can rationally invest in a product it intends to give away into perpetuity. Second, we identify distinct markets for content providers and end consumers and show that either can be a candidate for a free good. Third, product coupling across markets can increase consumer welfare even as it increases firm profits. The model also generates testable hypotheses on the size and direction of network effects while offering insights to regulators seeking to apply antitrust law to network markets.

[1]  M. Whinston Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion , 1989 .

[2]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[3]  Vivek Chaudhri,et al.  Pricing and efficiency of a circulation industry: The case of newspapers , 1998 .

[4]  John Gallaugher,et al.  Understanding Network Effects in Software Markets: Evidence from Web Server Pricing , 2002, MIS Q..

[5]  H. Varian,et al.  The Art of Standards Wars , 1999 .

[6]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Network externality : an uncommon tragedy , 1994 .

[7]  B. Nalebuff,et al.  Bundling , 1999 .

[8]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[9]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Sorority Rush as a Two-Sided Matching Mechanism , 1991 .

[10]  Patrick DeGraba Why Lever into a Zero‐Profit Industry: Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion , 1996 .

[11]  H. Varian Sequential contributions to public goods , 1994 .

[12]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[13]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[14]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competing Matchmakers , 2001 .

[15]  M. Salinger A Graphical Analysis of Bundling , 1995 .

[16]  H. Varian Sequential Provision Of Public Goods , 1990 .

[17]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Information Complements, Substitutes, and Strategic Product Design , 2000, ICIS.

[18]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.

[19]  Augustin M. Cournot Cournot, Antoine Augustin: Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses , 2019, Die 100 wichtigsten Werke der Ökonomie.

[20]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly , 1976 .

[21]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  Two-Sided Markets: An Overview ∗ , 2004 .

[22]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[23]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency , 1998 .

[24]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[25]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[26]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .