Geotechnical and geological studies of NWCT tunnel in Iran focusing on the stabilization analysis an

In this paper, a detailed geomechanical investigation of rock masses of North Water Convey Tunnel (NWCT) and its stability analysis has been carried out. The NWCT is located in the north of Iran and is to be constructed in-order to convey water for agriculture purposes. The main instability in the tunnel is joints and faults. The rocks mass encountered in the tunnel route are made of argillaceous, sandstone and shale. The tunnel has been divided into two parts, lot1 and lot2 having a length of 14 km and 26 km respectively. It is proposed to be constructed by telescopic shield method using a tunnel boring machine (TBM). In this study, the most suitable methods are utilized for the stability analysis and design of support of the tunnel. For the empirical investigation, the rock mass were classified based on RMR, Q, RSR, GSI and Rmi systems. The geomechanical properties of the rock mass were determined from the laboratory and field investigations. The results obtained from the analysis show that the tunnel is highly unstable due to the presence of a fault and hence strong supports are need in these regions. The support system used is concrete lining, as the tunnel in used for water conveyance. The tunnel alignment in lot1 is divided into 12 lithology types as; LI-SH1, LI-SH2, LI-SH3, LI-SH4, LI1, LI2, LI3, LI4, LI5, SI, CZ and FZ regions. Similarly, the tunnel alignment in lot2 is divided into 21 lithology types as; SH-ML1, SH-ML2, SH-ML3, MLI-SH1, ML-SH2, ML-SH3, ML-SH4, ML-SH5, SH-LS1, SH-LS2, SH-LS3, SHLS4, LI2, LI3, LI4, LI5, LI6, LI-MA, LI-SH, CZ, FZ regions. A stability analysis is a necessity as during the tunneling instabilities, such as the presence of a shear zones, may cause an obstruction and delaying of TBM progressing rate.

[1]  K. K. Panthi,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of tunnel squeezing for two tunnel cases from Nepal Himalaya , 2007 .

[2]  Giovanni Battista Barla,et al.  Viscoplastic models for the analysis of tunnel reinforcement in squeezing rock conditions , 2010 .

[3]  S. H. Kim,et al.  Predicted and measured tunnel face behaviour during shield tunneling in soft ground , 2006 .

[4]  Kamal C. Das,et al.  Extended Finite Element Method for the Analysis of Discontinuities in Rock Masses , 2010 .

[5]  Hakan Basarir,et al.  Analysis of rock–support interaction using numerical and multiple regression modeling , 2008 .

[6]  Nick Barton,et al.  TBM Tunnelling in Jointed and Faulted Rock , 2000 .

[7]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Determination of residual strength parameters of jointed rock masses using the GSI system , 2007 .

[8]  G. Exadaktylos,et al.  A Combined Three-Dimensional Geological-Geostatistical-Numerical Model of Underground Excavations in Rock , 2007 .

[9]  Rajinder Bhasin,et al.  The use of stress-strength relationships in the assessment of tunnel stability , 1996 .

[10]  Z. Bieniawski.  Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories , 1978 .

[11]  C. Fairhurst,et al.  APPLICATION OF THE CONVERGENCE-CONFINEMENT METHOD OF TUNNEL DESIGN TO ROCK MASSES THAT SATISFY THE HOEK-BROWN FAILURE CRITERION , 2000 .

[12]  R. Goel,et al.  Tunnelling through the young Himalayas — A case history of the Maneri-Uttarkashi power tunnel , 1995 .

[13]  N. D. Perrin,et al.  Applicability of the Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion to New Zealand Greywacke Rocks , 1999 .

[14]  Alessandro Tibaldi,et al.  Physical and mechanical properties of rock masses at Stromboli: a dataset for volcano instability evaluation , 2005 .

[15]  Arild Palmström,et al.  Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD) , 2005 .

[16]  Bhawani Singh,et al.  Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass quality , 1992 .

[17]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Practical estimates of rock mass strength , 1997 .

[18]  Nick Barton,et al.  Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support , 1974 .

[19]  Ashish Juneja,et al.  Centrifuge modelling of tunnel face reinforcement using forepoling , 2010 .

[20]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Progressive spalling in massive brittle rock , 2000 .

[21]  A. I. Sofianos,et al.  A correlation of four rock mass classification systems through their fabric indices , 2007 .

[22]  Ebrahim Farrokh,et al.  Evaluation of ground convergence and squeezing potential in the TBM driven Ghomroud tunnel project , 2006 .

[23]  G. Exadaktylos,et al.  A specific upscaling theory of rock mass parameters exhibiting spatial variability: Analytical relations and computational scheme , 2008 .

[24]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Support of underground excavations in hard rock , 1995 .

[25]  Z. Bieniawski.  Engineering rock mass classifications , 1989 .

[26]  Nick Barton,et al.  Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design , 2002 .

[27]  D. Sterpi,et al.  Viscoplastic models for the analysis of tunnel reinforcement insqueezing rock conditions , 2010 .