Postembryonic nongonadal cell lineages of the nematode Panagrellus redivivus: description and comparison with those of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Abstract The postembryonic nongonadal cell lineages of the nematode Panagrellus redivivus are described and compared with those of Caenorhabditis elegans . The newly hatched larvae of P. redivivus females and males and C. elegans hermaphrodites and males are very similar. An almost identical set of blast cells divides postembryonically in P. redivivus and C. elegans to produce similar changes in the neuronal, muscular, hypodermal, and digestive systems. Most of these cell lineages are invariant; however, there is substantial variability in the number of cell divisions in the relatively extensive lineages of the lateral hypodermis of P. redivivus . Typically, in P. redivivus females, 55 blast cells generate 635 surviving progeny and 29 cell deaths; in P. redivivus males, 59 blast cells generate 758 surviving progeny and 35 cell deaths. The lineages generating the cells of the male tails of P. redivivus and C. elegans are almost identical; thus, the grossly different characteristics of these structures must reflect differences in the morphogenesis of cells equivalent in lineage history. Laser ablation experiments demonstrate that the gonad induces vulva development and that cell-cell interactions are important in specifying the fates of hypodermal precursor cells. The lateral hypodermal lineages provide striking examples of the apparent construction of complex lineages from modular sublineages; one simple pattern of cell divisions and cell fates occurs 70 times in the P. redivivus female. The differences in cell lineage between P. redivivus and C. elegans are relatively minor, and many appear to have involved two types of evolutionary change: the replacement of sublineages, and the modification of sublineages by the four classes of lineage transformations previously proposed based on a comparison of P. redivivus and C. elegans gonadal cell lineages (Sternberg and Horvitz, 1981). These types of differences suggest that the genetic programming of cell lineage includes instructions specifying where and when a particular sublineage is utilized, and other instructions specifying the nature of that sublineage.