Pathological and oncological features of Korean prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: analysis from the K-CaP registry

Background A web-based multicenter Korean Prostate Cancer Database (K-CaP) was established to provide urologists with information on Korean prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). We utilized the K-CaP registry to identify pathological features and oncological outcomes of Korean PCa patients eligible for active surveillance (AS). Methods The K-CaP registry consisted of 6415 patients who underwent RP from May 2001 to April 2013 at five institutions. Preoperative clinicopathological data were collected to identify patients who were eligible for at least one contemporary AS protocol. Patients who had received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy or a 5α-reductase inhibitor, who had <10 total biopsy cores, or who had incomplete data were excluded. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≥0.2 ng/ml following RP. Results A total of 560 patients were identified, and the median follow-up period was 52.0 (interquartile range, 39.0-67.3) months. Pathologically insignificant PCa, defined as organ-confined disease with Gleason score ≤6 was observed in 314 (56.1%) patients. Pathological upgrading (Gleason score ≥7) and upstaging (≥pT3) were observed in 237 (42.3%) and 75 (13.4%) patients, respectively. Unfavorable disease (extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or Gleason score ≥8) was observed in 85 (15.2%) patients. PSA density ≤0.2 ng/ml/cc and maximal single core involvement ≤20% were revealed as independent preoperative predictors of pathologically insignificant PCa. Conclusion Contemporary Western AS protocols unreliably predict pathologically insignificant PCa in Korean men. Korean men may harbor more aggressive PCa features than Western men, and thus, a more stringent AS protocol is needed.

[1]  Hannah Stower Cancer risk , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[2]  Hwanjo Yu,et al.  Is lymphovascular invasion a powerful predictor for biochemical recurrence in pT3 N0 prostate cancer? Results from the K-CaP database , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Sangeeta Khare,et al.  Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays formonitoring autophagy (3rd edition) , 2016 .

[4]  K. Rha,et al.  Prognostic Impacts of Metastatic Site and Pain on Progression to Castrate Resistance and Mortality in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2015, Yonsei medical journal.

[5]  J. Brooks,et al.  Higher rates of upgrading and upstaging in older patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and qualifying for active surveillance , 2014, BJU international.

[6]  K. Rha,et al.  Low body mass index is associated with adverse oncological outcomes following radical prostatectomy in Korean prostate cancer patients , 2014, International Urology and Nephrology.

[7]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Prevalence of prostate cancer on autopsy: cross-sectional study on unscreened Caucasian and Asian men. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  Y. Kakeji,et al.  Estrogen receptor‐β gene polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: Effect modified by body mass index and isoflavone intake , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[9]  J. Stanford,et al.  Association of variants in estrogen‐related pathway genes with prostate cancer risk , 2013, The Prostate.

[10]  A. Morgentaler LOW TESTOSTERONE LEVELS ARE RELATED TO POOR PROGNOSIS FACTORS IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER PRIOR TO TREATMENT , 2012, BJU international.

[11]  Y. Choi,et al.  Comparison of pathological outcomes of active surveillance candidates who underwent radical prostatectomy using contemporary protocols at a high-volume Korean center. , 2012, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[12]  S. Taboga,et al.  High-fat diet obesity associated with insulin resistance increases cell proliferation, estrogen receptor, and PI3K proteins in rat ventral prostate. , 2012, Journal of andrology.

[13]  M. Jordá,et al.  Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols. , 2012, European urology.

[14]  Robert Clarke,et al.  Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy , 2012 .

[15]  K. Park,et al.  Are Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancers Really Insignificant among Korean Men? , 2012, Yonsei medical journal.

[16]  M. O'rourke The prostate-specific antigen screening conundrum: examining the evidence. , 2011, Seminars in oncology nursing.

[17]  D. Korzick,et al.  Increased estrogen receptor β in adipose tissue is associated with increased intracellular and reduced circulating adiponectin protein levels in aged female rats. , 2011, Gender medicine.

[18]  S. Byun,et al.  Application of the Epstein criteria for prediction of clinically insignificant prostate cancer in Korean men , 2010, BJU international.

[19]  C. Stephan,et al.  Prostate specific antigen density to predict prostate cancer upgrading in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series: a single center experience. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[20]  Alexandre Mamedov,et al.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  R A Knight,et al.  Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring cell death in higher eukaryotes , 2009, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[22]  Nicolas Barry Delongchamps,et al.  Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  W. Catalona,et al.  Pathological features after radical prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[24]  Y. Collan,et al.  Prognostic factors in prostate cancer , 2006, Diagnostic pathology.

[25]  M. Terris,et al.  Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  M. Terris,et al.  Impact of obesity on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a report by the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database study group. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  C. Nishida,et al.  Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies , 2004, The Lancet.

[28]  J. Moul,et al.  Relationship between obesity and race in predicting adverse pathologic variables in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. , 2001, Urology.

[29]  van Houten Me,et al.  Differences in reproductive endocrinology between Asian men and Caucasian men--a literature review. , 2000 .

[30]  W. DeWolf,et al.  Is low serum free testosterone a marker for high grade prostate cancer? , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[31]  G. Hallmans,et al.  Inhibitory effects of soy and rye diets on the development of Dunning R3327 prostate adenocarcinoma in rats , 1998, The Prostate.