The Evolution of the Three Point Seat Belt from Yesterday to Tomorrow

The three point seat belt (the safety belt) has been in use in cars for almost fifty years. In 1959 Volvo, as the first car producer in the world, started to install three point safety belts (of the static type) for front seat occupants as standard equipment. A few years later it was obvious from car accident studies that safety belts were of considerable benefit. No other safety product has saved so many lives of car occupants as the seat belt. Other products such as frontal and side airbags have been successfully implemented to further enhance car occupant protection. However, these new restraint systems complement the three point seat belt rather than replacing it. Several improvements to the seat belt have taken place over the years. The first was the inertia reel (the belt retractor) during the 1960s, followed by the retractor pretensioner and the buckle pretensioner during 1980s. The largest improvement made so far was probably the shoulder belt force limiter introduced in 1995. The first, and an important, step into active and integrated safety was taken by Mercedes-Benz in 2002 with the belt pre-pretensioner (PRE-SAFE). Possible future improvements such as various ways to prevent car occupants' upper torso from sliding out of the shoulder belt in rollovers and in far-side impacts are discussed, as well as steps to take elderly even more into account by a further reduction of the risk of sustaining serious chest injuries in frontal crashes. More also needs to be done to prevent violent head-to-upper torso motions to reduce the risk of sustaining disabling neck injuries with long term consequences. The three point seat belt will probably remain the primary car occupant restraint system for many more years. Its protection capabilities combined with other restraint systems can be developed further, as well as improvements to its ease of use. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

[1]  Roger N. Hardy,et al.  BOSCOS: development and benefits of a bone scanning system , 2005 .

[2]  David Lessley,et al.  Thoracic response to dynamic, non-impact loading from a hub, distributed belt, diagonal belt, and double diagonal belts. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[3]  L Evans,et al.  Motorized two-point safety belt effectiveness in preventing fatalities. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Richard W. Kent,et al.  Development of an age-dependent thoracic injury criterion for frontal , 2003 .

[5]  Katarina Bohman,et al.  Reduction of Head Rotational Motions in Side Impacts Due to the Inflatable Curtain-A Way to Bring Down the Risk of Diffuse Brain Injury , 1998 .

[6]  F Bendjellal,et al.  Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes for Occupant Restrained without Belt Load Limiters and Those Restrained with 6 kN and 4 kN Belt Load Limiters. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[7]  J Forman,et al.  Biomechanical considerations for the optimization of an advanced restraint system: assessing the benefit of a second shoulder belt , 2005 .

[8]  C. Got,et al.  Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes with Occupant Restrained with Belt Load Limiter , 1998 .

[9]  C. G. Backstrom Traffic injuries in south Sweden; with special reference to medico-legal autopsies of car occupants and value of safety belts. , 1963, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[10]  R Justen,et al.  Pre-safe - the next step in the enhancement of vehicle safety , 2003 .

[11]  G Nilson,et al.  Seat belt pretensioners to avoid the risk of submarining - a study of lap-belt slippage factors , 1993 .

[12]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  The whips seat - a car seat for improved protection against neck injuries in rear end impacts , 1998 .

[13]  Thomas Breitling,et al.  Enhancement of Active & Passive Safety by Future PRE-SAFE® Systems , 2005 .

[14]  Ralf Bogenrieder,et al.  PRE-SAFE: a new preventive system for occupant safety , 2002 .

[15]  Yngve Haland,et al.  A MECHANICAL BUCKLE PRETENSIONER TO IMPROVE A THREE POINT SEAT BELT. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1989 .

[16]  Maria Krafft NON-FATAL INJURIES TO CAR OCCUPANTS: INJURY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF IMPACTS CAUSING SHORT AND LONG TERM CONSEQUENCES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO NECK INJURIES , 1998 .

[17]  D Adomeit,et al.  Seat Design-A Significant Factor for Safety Belt Effectiveness , 1979 .

[18]  Heinz Eyrainer,et al.  THREE-POINT BELT IMPROVEMENTS FOR INCREASED OCCUPANT PROTECTION. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1984 .

[19]  Hans Norin,et al.  Seat Belt Usage in Sweden and Its Injury Reducing Effect , 1984 .

[20]  K Svedlund POSSIBLE OUT-OF-POSITIONS FOR UNRESTRAINED FRONT SEAT PASSENGERS , 1994 .

[21]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  NEW AIS1 LONG-TERM NECK INJURY CRITERIA CANDIDATES BASED ON REAL FRONTAL CRASH ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[22]  Ola Boström,et al.  Seat Integrated 3 Point Belt with Reversed Geometry and an Inboard Torso Side-Support Airbag for Improved Protection in Rollover , 2005 .

[23]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  INJURY RISK CURVES FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS IN FRONTAL AND REAR COLLISIONS , 1997 .

[24]  Ola Boström,et al.  Benefits of a 3+2 point belt system and an inboard torso side support in frontal, far-side and rollover crashes , 2003 .

[25]  N. I. Bohlin,et al.  A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF 28,000 ACCIDENT CASES WITH EMPHASIS ON OCCUPANT RESTRAINT VALUE. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1967 .

[26]  B ALDMAN,et al.  Biodynamic studies on impact protection. , 1962, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[27]  A Kullgren,et al.  A Study of AIS1 Neck Injury Parameters in 168 Frontal Collisions Using a Restrained Hybrid III Dummy. , 2000, Stapp car crash journal.