The orientation of homing pigeons (Columba livia f.d.) with and without navigational experience in a two-dimensional environment

Homing pigeons are known for their excellent homing ability, and their brains seem to be functionally adapted to homing. It is known that pigeons with navigational experience show a larger hippocampus and also a more lateralised brain than pigeons without navigational experience. So we hypothesized that experience may have an influence also on orientation ability. We examined two groups of pigeons (11 with navigational experience and 17 without) in a standard operant chamber with a touch screen monitor showing a 2-D schematic of a rectangular environment (as “geometric” information) and one uniquely shaped and colored feature in each corner (as “landmark” information). Pigeons were trained first for pecking on one of these features and then we examined their ability to encode geometric and landmark information in four tests by modifying the rectangular environment. All tests were done under binocular and monocular viewing to test hemispheric dominance. The number of pecks was counted for analysis. Results show that generally both groups orientate on the basis of landmarks and the geometry of environment, but landmark information was preferred. Pigeons with navigational experience did not perform better on the tests but showed a better conjunction of the different kinds of information. Significant differences between monocular and binocular viewing were detected particularly in pigeons without navigational experience on two tests with reduced information. Our data suggest that the conjunction of geometric and landmark information might be integrated after processing separately in each hemisphere and that this process is influenced by experience.

[1]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Brains, Innovations and Evolution in Birds and Primates , 2004, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[2]  S. Healy Spatial representation in animals. , 1998 .

[3]  Julia Mehlhorn,et al.  Neurobiology of the homing pigeon—a review , 2009, Naturwissenschaften.

[4]  Tomokazu Ushitani,et al.  Flexible learning and use of multiple-landmark information by pigeons (Columba livia) in a touch screen-based goal searching task. , 2011, Journal of comparative psychology.

[5]  F. Ströckens,et al.  Functional and structural comparison of visual lateralization in birds – similar but still different , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[6]  L. Rogers,et al.  Behavioral, Structural and Neurochemical Asymmetries in the Avian Brain: A Model System for Studying Visual Development and Processing , 1996, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[9]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Effects of monocular viewing on orientation in an arena at the release site and homing performance in pigeons , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Geometry and landmark representation by pigeons: evidence for species‐differences in the hemispheric organization of spatial information processing? , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Brain asymmetry (animal). , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[12]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Left-hemispheric superiority for visuospatial orientation in homing pigeons , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Navigation by environmental geometry: the use of zebrafish as a model , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  Frances McGlannan BRAIN — Asymmetry , 1976 .

[15]  J. Hounsgaard,et al.  Organization of Projection-Specific Interneurons in the Spinal Cord of the Red-Eared Turtle , 2008, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[16]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Doing Socrates experiment right: controlled rearing studies of geometrical knowledge in animals , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  J. Wild,et al.  Having the nerve to home: trigeminal magnetoreceptor versus olfactory mediation of homing in pigeons , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[19]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the Avian Brain. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[21]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Animals as Natural Geometers , 2009 .

[22]  J. McKENDRICK,et al.  The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates , 1909, Nature.

[23]  O. Güntürkün Morphological asymmetries of the tectum opticum in the pigeon , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Julia Mehlhorn,et al.  Asymmetry of different brain structures in homing pigeons with and without navigational experience , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Separate Geometric and Non-Geometric Modules for Spatial Reorientation: Evidence from a Lopsided Animal Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  H. Frahm,et al.  Allometric comparison of brain weight and brain structure volumes in different breeds of the domestic pigeon, Columba livia f.d. (fantails, homing pigeons, strassers). , 1988, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[27]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Lateral asymmetries due to preferences in eye use during visual discrimination learning in chicks , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  Marcia L Spetch,et al.  Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: II. Do pigeons (Columba livia) encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[29]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[30]  M L Spetch,et al.  Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[31]  E. Spelke,et al.  Inexperienced newborn chicks use geometry to spontaneously reorient to an artificial social partner. , 2015, Developmental science.

[32]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[33]  J. J. Siegel,et al.  Hippocampus and homing in pigeons: left and right hemispheric differences in navigational map learning , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[35]  G. Dell’Omo,et al.  Finding home: the final step of the pigeons' homing process studied with a GPS data logger , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[36]  P. MacNeilage Divided Brains: the Biology and Behaviour of Brain Asymmetries Leslie J. Rogers Giorgio Vallortigara , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  H. Frahm,et al.  Mosaic Evolution and Adaptive Brain Component Alteration under Domestication Seen on the Background of Evolutionary Theory , 2007, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[38]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  Origins of the left and right brain , 2009 .

[39]  Stephen Roberts,et al.  Pigeons combine compass and landmark guidance in familiar route navigation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Lateralized reward‐related visual discrimination in the avian entopallium , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[41]  O. Güntürkün The functional organization of the avian visual system , 1991 .

[42]  C. Walcott Multi-modal Orientation Cues in Homing Pigeons1 , 2005, Integrative and comparative biology.

[43]  Verner P Bingman,et al.  Lateralization of spatial learning in the avian hippocampal formation. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[44]  Sharon R. Doerkson,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans : II . Generality Across Search Tasks , 2001 .

[45]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  From natural geometry to spatial cognition , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[46]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Origins of the left & right brain. , 2009, Scientific American.

[47]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[48]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Visual lateralization and homing in pigeons , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[49]  R. Andrew,et al.  Right hemisphere advantage for topographical orientation in the domestic chick , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Hippocampal formation is required for geometric navigation in pigeons , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[51]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Independent effects of geometry and landmark in a spontaneous reorientation task: a study of two species of fish , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[52]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Growing in circles: rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish. , 2007, Psychological science.

[53]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Stable Panoramic Views Facilitate Snap-Shot Like Memories for Spatial Reorientation in Homing Pigeons , 2011, PloS one.

[54]  D. Biro,et al.  Homing pigeons develop local route stereotypy , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Navigating Through an Asymmetrical Brain: Lateralisation and Homing in Pigeon , 2013 .

[56]  L. Rogers,et al.  Light experience and lateralization of the two visual pathways in the chick , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[57]  Charles A. Edwards,et al.  Pigeons', Columba livia, use of global and local cues for spatial memory , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Hippocampus and medial striatum dissociation during goal navigation by geometry or features in the domestic chick: An immediate early gene study , 2016, Hippocampus.

[59]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Chicks, like children, spontaneously reorient by three-dimensional environmental geometry, not by image matching , 2012, Biology Letters.

[60]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[61]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[62]  Ingo Schiffner,et al.  Homing flights of pigeons over familiar terrain , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  Martin Möhle,et al.  Navigational Experience Affects Hippocampus Size in Homing Pigeons , 2008, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[64]  J. Krebs,et al.  Hippocampal growth and attrition in birds affected by experience. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  M L Spetch,et al.  Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[66]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Asymmetric visual input and route recapitulation in homing pigeons , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  O. Güntürkün The avian ‘prefrontal cortex’ and cognition , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[68]  J. J. Siegel,et al.  The Homing Pigeon Hippocampus and Space: In Search of Adaptive Specialization , 2003, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.