The Energetic Metabolism of Societies: Part II: Empirical Examples

Part I of this set of articles proposed methods to account for the energetic metabolism of societies. In this second part, the methods explicated in Part I are used to analyze the energy flows of societies with different “modes of subsistence”: hunter‐gatherers, a contemporary agricultural society in southeastern Asia, and a contemporary industrial society (Austria). The empirical examples are used to demonstrate differences in the “characteristic metabolism” of different modes of sub‐sistence. The energy system of hunter‐gatherers can be described as an “uncontrolled solar energy system,” based mainly upon harvesting biomass without attending to its reproduction. Hunter‐gatherers use only about 0.001% to 0.01% of the net primary production (NPP) of the territory they inhabit. Agricultural societies harness NPP to a much higher extent: Although agriculture often reduces NPP, the amount of biomass that agricultural societies use is much higher (about 20% of potential NPP). Because ecological energy flows are the main source of energy for agricultural societies, NPP strictly limits the energetic metabolism of agricultural societies. Industrial society uses area‐independent energy sources (fossil and nuclear energy), which, however, result in new sustainability problems, such as greenhouse gas emissions. By providing methods to account for changes in energy flows, the metabolism approach proves itself to be a useful concept for analyzing society‐environment interactions. The article demonstrates the difference between the metabolism approach and conventional energy statistics and discusses the significance of the proposed approach for sustainable development.

[1]  V. Smil.  General Energetics: Energy in the Biosphere and Civilization , 1991 .

[2]  Juan Martinez-Alier,et al.  Ecological Economics: Energy, Environment and Society , 1987 .

[3]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Changes in ecosystem processes induced by land use: Human appropriation of aboveground NPP and its influence on standing crop in Austria , 2001 .

[4]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Cascade utilization of biomass: strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource , 2000 .

[5]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production , 2002, Science.

[6]  C. Davidson.  Economic Growth and the Environment:Alternatives to the Limits Paradigm , 2000 .

[7]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Energy efficiency: Assessing the interaction between humans and their environment , 1991 .

[8]  Rolf Peter Sieferle.  Rückblick auf die Natur. Eine Geschichte des Menschen und seiner Umwelt , 1997 .

[9]  R. Netting.  Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community , 1983 .

[10]  Richard A. Houghton,et al.  Land‐use change and the carbon cycle , 1995 .

[11]  William H. Schlesinger,et al.  Limited carbon storage in soil and litter of experimental forest plots under increased atmospheric CO2 , 2001, Nature.

[12]  P. Bohannan.  Cultural Anthropology , 2020, Nature.

[13]  D. E. Vasey.  An Ecological History of Agriculture, 10,000 B.C.-A.D.10,000 , 1999 .

[14]  Fridolin Krausmann,et al.  Land use and industrial modernization: an empirical analysis of human influence on the functioning of ecosystems in Austria 1830–1995 , 2001 .

[15]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  The Energetic Metabolism of Societies Part I: Accounting Concepts , 2001 .

[16]  Susan E. Trumbore,et al.  Carbon sink for a century , 2001, Nature.

[17]  W. Ostwald.  Energetische Grundlagen Der Kulturwissenschaft , 1909 .

[18]  D. Wright,et al.  Human impacts on energy flow through natural ecosystems, and implications for species endangerment. , 1990 .

[19]  Environment in the European Union at the turn of the century: Summary , 1999 .

[20]  Richard C. Fluck,et al.  Energy of Human Labor , 1992 .

[21]  James C. Williams,et al.  Energy in World History , 1994 .

[22]  A. J. Lotka.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[23]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Land use, land-use change and forestry. Summary for policymakers. , 2000 .

[24]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Bioenergy: Direct applications in cooking , 1993 .

[25]  Karl W. Butzer,et al.  Archaeology as human ecology , 1982 .

[26]  Robert Costanza,et al.  An Introduction to Ecological Economics , 1997 .

[27]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Tons, joules, and money: Modes of production and their sustainability problems , 1997 .

[28]  R. Netting.  Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture , 1994 .

[29]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Food Production and the Energy Crisis , 1973, Science.

[30]  C. Hall,et al.  Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective , 1984, Science.

[31]  M. Sahlins.  Stone Age Economics , 2020 .

[32]  Marina Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung von Natur : ein Versuch in Sozialer Ökologie , 1997 .

[33]  P. Baker,et al.  Caloric requirements of human populations: A model , 1984 .

[34]  M. Obersteiner.  Avoiding a Lemons Market by Including Uncertainty in the Kyoto Protocol: Same Mechanism - Improved Rules , 2000 .

[35]  Marvin Harris,et al.  Comment on Vayda's review of good to eat: Riddles of food and culture , 1987 .

[36]  C. Hall,et al.  Energy and Resource Quality: The Ecology of the Economic Process , 1992 .

[37]  A. Vayda.  Explaining what people eat: A review article , 1987 .

[38]  Mark Sagoff,et al.  Carrying capacity and ecological economics , 1995 .

[39]  S. Boyden,et al.  Biohistory: The Interplay Between Human Society and the Biosphere, Past and Present , 1992 .

[40]  W. B. Kemp.  The flow of energy in a hunting society. , 1971, Scientific American.

[41]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  HUMAN APPROPRIATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[42]  Bob Frankston,et al.  Beyond limits , 1997 .

[43]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Beyond the limits: global collapse or a sustainable future? , 1992 .

[44]  J. Sarmiento.  That sinking feeling , 2000, Nature.