A critical assessment of the impact of mixing on dilution refolding

Refolding often presents a bottleneck in the generation of recombinant protein expressed as inclusion bodies. Few studies have looked at the effect of physical factors on the yield from refolding steps. Refold reactors typically operate in fed‐batch mode with a slow injection rate. This paper characterizes mixing in a novel reactor, and seeks to relate the conditions of mixing to native lysozyme yields after refolding. A novel twin‐impeller system incorporating a mini‐paddle impeller located in the vicinity of the injection point was used to increase the local levels of energy dissipation experienced by the injected material, and to improve refolding yields. Mixing only affected yields during and immediately after denatured protein addition. Analysis of lysozyme refolding yield, under a variety of conditions, revealed that dispersive mixing affected the yield. The beneficial effect of the mini‐paddle impeller in providing a source of localized energy dissipation was limited to conditions where the bulk impeller intensity was low. The effects appeared to become more significant when injection times were longer, because of increased exposure of the injected material to the energy dissipation of the mini‐impeller. The results suggest that for fed‐batch protein refolding systems, where mixing has been shown to be a critical factor, the local energy dissipation experienced in the vicinity of the injection point is critical to the refolding yields. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Fabrice Guillard,et al.  Mixing in industrial Rushton turbine-agitated reactors under aerated conditions , 2003 .

[2]  David A. Agard,et al.  Unfolded conformations of α-lytic protease are more stable than its native state , 1998, Nature.

[3]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Micromixing efficiency in static mixer , 2001 .

[4]  D. Hevehan,et al.  Oxidative Renaturation of Hen Egg‐White Lysozyme. Folding vs Aggregation , 1998, Biotechnology progress.

[5]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  Study Of Micromixing in a Stirred Tank Using a Rushton Turbine: Comparison of Feed Positions and Other Mixing Devices , 2002 .

[6]  A. Vertès,et al.  Effect of operating variables on the yield of recombinant trypsinogen for a pulse-fed dilution-refolding reactor. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  Pauline M. Doran,et al.  Bioprocess Engineering Principles , 1995 .

[8]  A. M. Buswell,et al.  Critical Analysis of Lysozyme Refolding Kinetics , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[9]  Robert T. Sauer,et al.  Acceleration of the refolding of Arc repressor by nucleic acids and other polyanions , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[10]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Three-state model for lysozyme folding: triangular folding mechanism with an energetically trapped intermediate. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Kinetic traps in lysozyme folding. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Micromixing Effects in Aerated Stirred Tank , 1997 .

[13]  R. Jaenicke,et al.  A kinetic study of the competition between renaturation and aggregation during the refolding of denatured-reduced egg white lysozyme. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[14]  Chung C. Hsu,et al.  Protein denaturation by combined effect of shear and air-liquid interface. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  M. Delepierre,et al.  Kinetics of Secondary Structure Recovery during the Refolding of Reduced Hen Egg White Lysozyme* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Clark,et al.  Refolding of recombinant proteins , 1998, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[17]  C. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Model studies on mixers in the viscous flow region , 1967 .

[18]  M. Yasuda,et al.  Effect of Additives on Refolding of a Denatured Protein , 1998, Biotechnology progress.

[19]  John R. Bourne,et al.  Chapter 10 – Mixing in single-phase chemical reactors , 1992 .

[20]  C. Tanford,et al.  Viscosity and density of aqueous solutions of urea and guanidine hydrochloride. , 1966, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  L. Falk,et al.  Characterisation of micromixing efficiency by the iodide–iodate reaction system. Part I: experimental procedure , 2000 .

[22]  Takashi Yamaguchi,et al.  REFOLDING OF ENZYMES IN A FED-BATCH OPERATION , 1999 .

[23]  D. Hevehan,et al.  Oxidative renaturation of lysozyme at high concentrations. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  James Y. Oldshue,et al.  Fluid Mixing Technology , 1983 .

[25]  Anton P. J. Middelberg,et al.  The influence of mixing on lysozyme renaturation during refolding in an oscillatory flow and a stirred-tank reactor , 2002 .

[26]  C. Dobson,et al.  The folding of hen lysozyme involves partially structured intermediates and multiple pathways , 1992, Nature.

[27]  Laurent Falk,et al.  A new parallel competing reaction system for assessing micromixing efficiency—Determination of micromixing time by a simple mixing model , 1996 .

[28]  C. Wong,et al.  Studies on homogenization efficiency of various agitators in liquid blending , 1984 .

[29]  A. M. Buswell,et al.  A new kinetic scheme for lysozyme refolding and aggregation , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  Shigeo Katoh,et al.  Continuous refolding of lysozyme with fed-batch addition of denatured protein solution , 2000 .